(1/4) JFK and the Reagan Revolution: A Secret History of American Prosperity Hardcover, by Lawrence Kudlow & Brian Domitrovic
Larry Kudlow and Brian Domitrovic's 'JFK and the Reagan Revolution'
reviewed by John Tamny or Forbes
It’s hard to imagine any of this nowadays, but if you were for income tax cuts in the 1970s you were an oddball. Neither Democrats nor Republicans were in favor of reductions in the tax burden. Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush both said tax cuts would unleash inflationary pressures. No less than Alan Greenspan observed about tax cutting economist Arthur Laffer back then that “I don’t know anyone who seriously believes his argument.” In light of the above, it’s no surprise that the 1970s were a relatively unhappy time for the U.S. electorate. With economic policy explicitly anti-production, growth wilted and Americans properly sulked. History is in many ways repeating itself in the 21st century. As Larry Kudlow and Brian Domitrovic write in their essential new book, JFK and the Reagan Revolution: A Secret History of American Prosperity, “Fifteen-plus years into the twenty-first century, Americans are in a sour mood. They are cranky. Unhappy.” It’s no mystery why. As Kudlow and Domitrovic note, since 2000 economic growth in the U.S. has been subpar to say the least. Democrats and Republicans have seemingly forgotten the basics to prosperity. In writing their book, the authors set out to remind readers that life – and by extension economic growth – isn’t that complicated. It’s as basic as a low tax/sound money policy mix. Years ago Kudlow’s teaching of the correct policy mix was broadened to include free trade and light regulation, and that hasn’t changed. He still believes that, as does Domitrovic. But in their first co-authored endeavor the authors have correctly decided to hammer away on taxes and money. Their explicit point is that our sour mood needn’t be permanent. They’re very right. With an eye on bringing life to the policy mix of economic growth that they view as “human,” “impressive,” “fulfilling,” and “good,” the authors first bring the reader back to the 1960s and John F. Kennedy’s (JFK) presidency. Though JFK was a Democrat, and was historically associated with American-style “liberal” policies, he’s experienced a modern revival in the eyes of many on the right owing to his stances in favor of tax cuts in concert with maintenance of a strong dollar. The authors should be cheered for what they’ve done. While it’s increasingly known that JFK swung more to the right than has been broadly reported by the mainstream, up until JFK and the Reagan Revolution there hadn’t really been any book expressly written to focus on the supply-side (all demand begins with production first, so “supply side” is all about reducing the tax, regulatory, trade and monetary barriers to production) history of JFK’s presidency. The latter is important on its own, but with the future in mind, it’s crucial: somewhere along the way the focus on growth became a partisan issue as Democrats and Republicans fought over what is obvious. Kudlow and Domitrovic have done the essential whereby they’ve shown that growth isn’t a partisan concept; that a Democrat and a Republican (Ronald Reagan) adopted similar policies to great, economy enhancing effect. The authors assert that "Both Kennedy and Reagan identified substantially cutting income tax rates and getting the dollar strong and stable as the specific policy mix that would let the private sector, which is to say the real economy, thrive.” Life is once again, very simple. So is economic growth. Let’s not forget that an economy is but a collection of individuals. Broken down to the individual we can easily see that no individual is made more prosperous if more and more of his income is confiscated through taxation. And as individuals take money in return for their production, their prosperity is surely not enhanced by devaluation of the very dollars, Pounds, euros, yen, and yuan they earn. Economi...