2/7 Keynes Hayek: The Clash that Defined Modern Economics, by Nicholas Wapshott
Photo: The Road to Serfdom cartoon book. Published in 1957?
See also: The Tuttle Twins and the Road to Surfdom, by Connor Boyack (November 14, 2016); for children
Permissions: Under Creative Commons (Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0): you are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially; terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made [no change made]. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. No additional restriction. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license term.
Participants: John Taylor, Hoover; Michael Boskin, Hoover; Russell Roberts, Hoover; Mary Kissel, Wall Street Journal; Nicholas Henry Wapshott (@NWapshott), author.
Keynes Hayek: The Clash that Defined Modern Economics Oct 11, 2011; by Nicholas Wapshott
“I defy anybody―Keynesian, Hayekian, or uncommitted―to read [Wapshott’s] work and not learn something new.”―John Cassidy, The New Yorker As the stock market crash of 1929 plunged the world into turmoil, two men emerged with competing claims on how to restore balance to economies gone awry. John Maynard Keynes, the mercurial Cambridge economist, believed that government had a duty to spend when others would not. He met his opposite in a little-known Austrian economics professor, Freidrich Hayek, who considered attempts to intervene both pointless and potentially dangerous. The battle lines thus drawn, Keynesian economics would dominate for decades and coincide with an era of unprecedented prosperity, but conservative economists and political leaders would eventually embrace and execute Hayek's contrary vision.
From their first face-to-face encounter to the heated arguments between their ardent disciples, Nicholas Wapshott here unearths the contemporary relevance of Keynes and Hayek, as present-day arguments over the virtues of the free market and government intervention rage with the same ferocity as they did in the 1930s. .. .. ..