@oren_cass: UBI (universal basic income) means: free money for everyone; the government should send a check to everyone in the country for about $1,000 a month.
Photo: On 4 October 2013, Swiss activists from "Generation Grundeinkommen" organised a performance in Bern were eight millions of valid Swiss 5-cent coins (one per inhabitant) were dumped on a the Bundesplatz, as a celebration of the successful collection of more than 125,000 signatures for their federal popular initiative, which forced the government to hold a referendum on whether or not to incorporate the concept of basic income in the Swiss Federal Constitution. In 2016, the referendum resulted in 76.9% of votes against the introduction of a basic income. By Stefan Bohrer
Permissions: This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of his or her rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law. You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
THE AMERICAN BUSINESS REPORT, BROUGHT TO YOU BY SCALA.COM
Conservatives and the Politics of Work: Oren Cass, Mitt Romney’s former domestic-policy director, says wage subsidies are an alternative to the current welfare state and the left’s universal basic income. https://www.wsj.com/articles/conservatives-and-the-politics-of-work-1543014553
.. .. ..
Oren Cass, Manhattan Institute senior Fellow, and author, The Once and Future Worker, in re: Universal basic income – UBI. This means: free money for everyone; the govt should send a check to everyone in the country for about $1,000 a month, so you can live on it if needed. Probably to anyone with a Social Security number, plus perhaps undocumented immigrants. Maybe everyone over age eighteen. Did McGovern speak of this in 1972? The thought is that it answers poverty – needn’t worry about the safety net, declining wages.
We currently have ways of conveying assets to people who are unemployed, disabled — many versions: in come subsidy, SNAP (food stamps), daycare, subsidized housing, does the thousand dollars take the place of all that? It varies a lot from proposal to proposal. Some say replace, others say on top of the programs. A thousand dollars a month sounds like a lot till you look at health insurance, Medicaid, elders with Medicare. This kind of idea has a lot of the Devil in the details. Tax increases would be needed--might double the size of the entire federal government, Once you plunge in, there’ll be no way out, ever.
It’s more important to focus on the conceptual aspect: do we like the idea? Is this what people really need? Is saying, “That’s OK; richer people will send you a check” —is that addressing their problems in am effective way? Do we really want to live in a society where everyone is in effect a trust fund baby? Taking care of yourself is no longer your responsibility. If people are underemployed, does giving them money for breathing solve their problem? The consumer approach we've taken – consumer welfare is what matters; we measure success by your material living standard, the economic pie.
That’s not consistent with what people really care about, what’s important in their lives, to their own happiness, to their families, their communities. For those, you have to worry about work, their role in the community, in the economy. Are they productive contributors, do they feel that they’re fulfilling their obligations? Do they have a purpose? Are they taking care of themselves and their families? If those are the foundation of a healthy society, then the UBI model is no answer at all.
JB: My time unemployed in life when I was a novelist, composing books or seeking publishers, I felt extremely empowered. Between those, I was discouraged. My memory is that it's very hard even as young, healthy person to walk...