1
00:00:01,260 --> 00:00:05,880
Eveline Oehrlich: Hello,
welcome. This is my first humans

2
00:00:05,910 --> 00:00:09,660
of DevOps podcast and I am
excited to have the boss lady

3
00:00:09,660 --> 00:00:12,930
with me today, Jane Groll.
Hello, Jane, how are you?

4
00:00:12,000 --> 00:00:16,350
Jayne Groll: Hello, Evelyn, how
are you? And thank you so much

5
00:00:16,350 --> 00:00:21,120
for taking on this new role as
host and facilitator for the

6
00:00:21,120 --> 00:00:24,450
humans of DevOps Podcast. I'm
really excited to be here with

7
00:00:24,450 --> 00:00:25,170
you today.

8
00:00:25,650 --> 00:00:27,750
Eveline Oehrlich: And I'm
excited to take it on because I,

9
00:00:27,810 --> 00:00:30,960
as I already shared with you,
there's tons of things we can

10
00:00:30,960 --> 00:00:34,290
talk about. But today, we're
actually here to talk about a

11
00:00:34,290 --> 00:00:38,610
most exciting topic, which is
Site Reliability Engineering. We

12
00:00:38,610 --> 00:00:42,660
did a recent report where, you
know, we had a tons of

13
00:00:42,840 --> 00:00:47,700
responses. So first question
Site Reliability, why is that

14
00:00:47,700 --> 00:00:49,590
such a big topic today?

15
00:00:50,370 --> 00:00:53,460
Jayne Groll: So, you know, you
and I both come from IT ops. And

16
00:00:53,460 --> 00:00:57,660
so I think, and, of course,
share your your perspective on

17
00:00:57,660 --> 00:01:01,410
that. But it's very gratifying
to see Site Reliability

18
00:01:01,410 --> 00:01:06,210
Engineering, really giving it
ops, kind of a new lens, or a

19
00:01:06,210 --> 00:01:10,470
new perspective, or even a new
role, right, an official role

20
00:01:10,470 --> 00:01:14,070
that organizations are hiring
and a set of practices that

21
00:01:14,070 --> 00:01:18,360
organizations can embrace. I
think it puts it ops look a lot

22
00:01:18,360 --> 00:01:24,690
about shift left in DevOps, it
really shifts IT ops. So far

23
00:01:24,690 --> 00:01:28,320
left, that, you know, according
to Google's definition, SRE is

24
00:01:28,320 --> 00:01:32,070
what happens when you take a
software engineer to help design

25
00:01:32,100 --> 00:01:36,990
and and, you know, be part of it
operations. Right. So it's a

26
00:01:36,990 --> 00:01:40,530
really exciting set of
practices. Is there a lot of new

27
00:01:40,560 --> 00:01:44,730
in SRE? Maybe, maybe not. I
mean, I always think of it is,

28
00:01:44,730 --> 00:01:48,240
you know, kind of a new, modern
approach to it, service

29
00:01:48,240 --> 00:01:52,260
management. But I think there's
just an underlying human

30
00:01:52,260 --> 00:01:55,440
excitement. And I said, you and
I've been watching it, you know,

31
00:01:55,440 --> 00:01:59,010
trending for a while with the
upskilling report. And I think

32
00:01:59,010 --> 00:02:04,140
it's extra exciting today, that
SRE has crossed the chasm,

33
00:02:04,170 --> 00:02:06,570
right? I mean, we saw that in
the report that it cross the

34
00:02:06,570 --> 00:02:10,980
chasm. And now enterprises are
starting to embrace it. What

35
00:02:10,980 --> 00:02:13,500
about your excitement? I said,
we both you know, we've we've

36
00:02:13,500 --> 00:02:15,900
known each other a long time,
we've kind of watched this rise

37
00:02:15,900 --> 00:02:16,560
together.

38
00:02:16,950 --> 00:02:19,350
Eveline Oehrlich: Yeah. So as
you said, I've been in IT ops

39
00:02:19,350 --> 00:02:24,150
also started out my career there
in 94. And my first day on the

40
00:02:24,150 --> 00:02:27,600
job was called a programmer by
somebody in the business line.

41
00:02:27,930 --> 00:02:30,900
Of course, I thought I was at
that time programmer wasn't a

42
00:02:30,900 --> 00:02:35,850
great at that time, it was not a
great term. But I have to say it

43
00:02:35,850 --> 00:02:39,660
was, at that time already a fun
job I had to do and could do a

44
00:02:39,660 --> 00:02:43,560
lot of things. So maybe both of
us already were SOEs, without

45
00:02:43,560 --> 00:02:48,120
even knowing it, then. But
again, exciting for what reasons

46
00:02:48,120 --> 00:02:51,210
what, what are some of the
things we found, if you want to

47
00:02:51,240 --> 00:02:55,380
go dive into why is it exciting?
What's changing? Why is

48
00:02:55,380 --> 00:02:58,710
everybody talking about it? And
why did we do the research?

49
00:02:59,530 --> 00:03:03,100
Jayne Groll: Well, I think the
big change is looking at

50
00:03:03,100 --> 00:03:07,570
operations as an engineering
discipline. And so when we look

51
00:03:07,570 --> 00:03:10,990
at software engineering, we look
at DevOps engineering, right, we

52
00:03:10,990 --> 00:03:14,650
look at a lot of the things that
that kind of have this

53
00:03:14,680 --> 00:03:19,750
engineering mentality, IT
operations was always on the

54
00:03:19,750 --> 00:03:23,320
sidelines, right? You know, you
and I stood with the help desk

55
00:03:23,320 --> 00:03:26,530
and everyone else, you know,
with our hands up against the

56
00:03:26,530 --> 00:03:29,860
fence waiting for something to
be thrown over. But we really

57
00:03:29,860 --> 00:03:34,810
weren't part of the solution. We
were there to fix the problems.

58
00:03:34,990 --> 00:03:39,790
And so I think that SRE kind of
respond that right, respond that

59
00:03:39,820 --> 00:03:43,810
in a way, starting with Google,
but then new practices grafting

60
00:03:43,990 --> 00:03:49,120
on top of it. So that led us to
think about this report. Because

61
00:03:49,120 --> 00:03:51,790
you know, you know, you and I
have been doing as part of

62
00:03:51,790 --> 00:03:55,690
DevOps Institute's upskilling
report for years. And one of the

63
00:03:55,690 --> 00:04:00,430
things we've seen is this, you
know, this trend with SRE, and

64
00:04:00,430 --> 00:04:04,780
then given our experience with
IT operations, and then you

65
00:04:04,780 --> 00:04:08,080
know, kind of this new
excitement about this role of

66
00:04:08,080 --> 00:04:11,320
site reliability engineer, it
made sense for you and I to say,

67
00:04:11,320 --> 00:04:14,830
Okay, let's take an agnostic
approach. And let's go back to

68
00:04:14,830 --> 00:04:17,740
the community, like we do with
the upscaling report and say,

69
00:04:17,890 --> 00:04:22,270
Tell us what's happening in the
real world with this set of

70
00:04:22,270 --> 00:04:25,780
practices? Is it the same? Is it
you know, the same as other

71
00:04:25,780 --> 00:04:28,870
frameworks? What are
organizations doing? How do you

72
00:04:28,870 --> 00:04:33,100
feel about about the role and
what kind of benefits or

73
00:04:33,100 --> 00:04:36,610
activities are you executing?
And so I was excited because I

74
00:04:36,610 --> 00:04:39,490
came to you and said, Hey, can
we do this? And you went, sure.

75
00:04:39,820 --> 00:04:43,870
And then we were even fortunate
to get, you know, Sumo Logic and

76
00:04:43,990 --> 00:04:49,720
StackState and Sedai to help
underwrite it. So, yes, it's a

77
00:04:49,720 --> 00:04:53,560
passion project, for sure. I
think for you and for I, right.

78
00:04:53,890 --> 00:04:57,010
Eveline Oehrlich: Yeah. So at
first, you know, I thought going

79
00:04:57,010 --> 00:05:00,340
down into the research and
crafting the survey questions, I

80
00:05:00,340 --> 00:05:06,310
was really focusing more on the
practices and the automation and

81
00:05:06,310 --> 00:05:10,690
of course, the adoption and the
different team topologies. And

82
00:05:10,690 --> 00:05:13,900
then when we talked it over with
the sponsors, we realized there

83
00:05:13,900 --> 00:05:22,270
was also a change in behavior.
And we wanted to tickle out that

84
00:05:22,390 --> 00:05:26,230
potential opportunity for people
to get excited about something

85
00:05:26,230 --> 00:05:29,170
different. Maybe you can talk a
little bit about that from a

86
00:05:29,170 --> 00:05:31,960
career perspective, because both
of us have been, you know,

87
00:05:31,960 --> 00:05:35,290
coaches, we've been leaders,
we've been in IT ops, you've

88
00:05:35,290 --> 00:05:38,980
done ITSM. I've been an analyst.
I've had lots of conversations

89
00:05:38,980 --> 00:05:41,860
with people who are just kind of
like, okay, yeah, this is my

90
00:05:41,860 --> 00:05:44,500
job. I go in in the morning and
then come home in the evening.

91
00:05:44,680 --> 00:05:48,520
But it's it felt to me that
there was something more tell us

92
00:05:48,520 --> 00:05:52,240
a little bit I know you use you
see it in the research, and I

93
00:05:52,240 --> 00:05:55,780
know you like that tickle as
well. What did you what? What's

94
00:05:55,780 --> 00:05:57,250
your thought around that?

95
00:05:57,420 --> 00:06:00,840
Jayne Groll: So the first thing
that struck me about SRE and I

96
00:06:00,840 --> 00:06:04,320
had the opportunity to go to a
very early ESRI con, right,

97
00:06:04,320 --> 00:06:07,530
where there was still
discussion, and it was still

98
00:06:07,560 --> 00:06:12,360
very much something that was
very Google specific. So

99
00:06:12,570 --> 00:06:15,060
technology companies were
looking at, you know, how do we

100
00:06:15,060 --> 00:06:18,750
replicate what was in the books,
but there's an underlying

101
00:06:18,810 --> 00:06:23,610
excitement or a dynamic that
that is baked into SRA, because

102
00:06:23,610 --> 00:06:27,180
it looks at some things that
maybe in the past have been a

103
00:06:27,180 --> 00:06:30,630
little bit heavier or more
disconnected, like, change

104
00:06:30,630 --> 00:06:33,330
management is a great example of
that, you know, for years and

105
00:06:33,330 --> 00:06:36,150
years and years, organizations
have struggled with how do we

106
00:06:36,150 --> 00:06:39,030
manage changes? How do we
control changes? Same thing with

107
00:06:39,030 --> 00:06:42,030
service level objectives, right?
What is the service level? Is it

108
00:06:42,180 --> 00:06:45,420
how we, you know, fix something
when it's broken? Or is it

109
00:06:45,420 --> 00:06:49,140
actually maintaining a level of
reliability. And then you add on

110
00:06:49,140 --> 00:06:52,140
top of that, the fact that in
the early days of DevOps, there

111
00:06:52,140 --> 00:06:56,040
was a lot of talk about no ops.
Now, the intent of no ops was

112
00:06:56,040 --> 00:07:00,510
more automation, which is also
baked into sre. But you know, as

113
00:07:00,510 --> 00:07:05,160
an IT ops person as assistance
administrator, as perhaps a role

114
00:07:05,160 --> 00:07:09,450
that wasn't considered part of
the cool kids club. Right? No

115
00:07:09,450 --> 00:07:14,640
ops kind of spoke to no job, no
respect. And now you spin

116
00:07:14,640 --> 00:07:19,500
around, and now you've got SRE,
which is, is very much a cool

117
00:07:19,500 --> 00:07:22,680
job. But but also, there's a
very human element that's baked

118
00:07:22,680 --> 00:07:26,880
into SRE as well, it is IT
Service Management. You know, I

119
00:07:26,880 --> 00:07:29,490
talked about this all the time,
it is about Incident Management,

120
00:07:29,490 --> 00:07:32,250
change management, Service Level
Management, you know,

121
00:07:32,250 --> 00:07:36,780
observability event management.
And so it is a kind of a cool

122
00:07:36,780 --> 00:07:41,040
version of ITSM, more
lightweight than perhaps some of

123
00:07:41,040 --> 00:07:44,610
the other practices. But some of
the core principles that were

124
00:07:44,610 --> 00:07:49,770
brought forth in essary are time
to make tomorrow better than

125
00:07:49,770 --> 00:07:54,180
today. So in a pure world, and
SRE is supposed to spend about

126
00:07:54,210 --> 00:07:58,950
50% of their time, you know,
reacting to, you know,

127
00:07:58,950 --> 00:08:03,060
whatever's happening, and 50% of
their time reducing toil, right,

128
00:08:03,060 --> 00:08:07,470
so looking at technical debt,
looking at automation, looking

129
00:08:07,470 --> 00:08:11,130
at some of the things that have
just been dragging it for a

130
00:08:11,130 --> 00:08:16,020
very, very long time. SRE says,
Hey, take some time, learn,

131
00:08:16,080 --> 00:08:21,840
right shadow share. And let's
look at ways to reduce that

132
00:08:21,870 --> 00:08:26,820
manual redundant work that
nobody likes to do. Right. But

133
00:08:26,820 --> 00:08:29,700
there's automation that will do
it for you. Right, but you've

134
00:08:29,700 --> 00:08:32,850
got to be able to have that kind
of innovation and the

135
00:08:32,850 --> 00:08:36,660
proactiveness. So there's a lot
of principles that are baked

136
00:08:36,660 --> 00:08:39,630
into SRE that are outside just
how do we manage your

137
00:08:39,630 --> 00:08:42,570
infrastructure? How do you
handle level two that are very

138
00:08:42,570 --> 00:08:46,410
human. And I think that may be
something that's contributing.

139
00:08:46,410 --> 00:08:49,830
And we saw in the report that
people said they were more

140
00:08:49,830 --> 00:08:52,800
excited about their roles that
they were being paid better that

141
00:08:52,950 --> 00:08:56,310
they were more engaged in, in
you know, the practices? I mean,

142
00:08:56,310 --> 00:08:59,340
you're more familiar with, with
the responses than I am? What

143
00:08:59,340 --> 00:09:02,580
did you see in terms of like,
did you feel an excitement in

144
00:09:02,580 --> 00:09:03,270
the data?

145
00:09:04,230 --> 00:09:07,890
Eveline Oehrlich: Yeah, a couple
of things, which, when you were

146
00:09:07,980 --> 00:09:11,010
talking about service
management, and the excitement,

147
00:09:11,040 --> 00:09:16,920
one is the topic of
collaboration, always seem to

148
00:09:16,980 --> 00:09:19,470
everybody always talks about,
you know, DevOps, we need to be

149
00:09:19,470 --> 00:09:22,140
better collaborators and
collaboration and knowledge

150
00:09:22,140 --> 00:09:26,580
management. But what we found in
the report is first, knowledge

151
00:09:26,580 --> 00:09:29,670
management was one of those
things where SRE is actually

152
00:09:29,700 --> 00:09:34,470
paid to capture their knowledge
and shifted left so that others

153
00:09:34,500 --> 00:09:38,100
upstream or even right
downstream can actually leverage

154
00:09:38,130 --> 00:09:42,900
to improve. So your job is
becoming somebody who on a

155
00:09:42,900 --> 00:09:47,490
proactive and while you're
reacting at a proactive level,

156
00:09:47,700 --> 00:09:51,420
insert your knowledge. So the
next time somebody knows a

157
00:09:51,420 --> 00:09:55,410
better way of doing things while
you actually do that, that is

158
00:09:55,410 --> 00:09:59,040
fantastic. So while we're still
reacting to some things, because

159
00:09:59,040 --> 00:10:03,240
we can't fix it all Oh, we can
be proactive. I think that was

160
00:10:03,300 --> 00:10:07,470
that was most important to me
being that collaborator. And if

161
00:10:07,470 --> 00:10:13,080
somebody asks me, What makes
how, what should I be what my

162
00:10:13,080 --> 00:10:17,670
skills need to be to be in an
SRE? Well, you have to be, like

163
00:10:17,670 --> 00:10:21,570
you said, an engineer, you have
to know data modeling, process

164
00:10:21,570 --> 00:10:23,970
modeling, you need to be in
analytics, you need to know

165
00:10:23,970 --> 00:10:26,550
software development lifecycle,
you have to have some knowledge

166
00:10:26,550 --> 00:10:30,870
about all this tech things. But
you also need to be able to

167
00:10:31,020 --> 00:10:36,390
understand where you can
actually allow the toil to be

168
00:10:36,390 --> 00:10:39,630
reduced. Where can you actually
help to make the biggest

169
00:10:39,630 --> 00:10:43,530
difference to developers, to
testers, to customers, to

170
00:10:43,530 --> 00:10:48,420
product line owners to all these
internal and external customers.

171
00:10:48,690 --> 00:10:52,650
And to me as an extrovert I am
unfortunately, some people think

172
00:10:52,650 --> 00:10:57,270
I may be too extrovert. That is,
that's the beauty of this job,

173
00:10:57,270 --> 00:10:59,700
you get to talk to people, you
get to collaborate, you get to

174
00:10:59,700 --> 00:11:04,020
work on multiple projects, while
you actually fix things, and you

175
00:11:04,020 --> 00:11:08,340
actually can see an outcome. And
that was reflected in being

176
00:11:08,430 --> 00:11:12,570
valued as a team member. Because
as I remember, back in my time,

177
00:11:12,840 --> 00:11:16,230
IT operations, the only time I
think I was really valued was

178
00:11:16,230 --> 00:11:22,980
when I carried the pager. The
factory and I could actually

179
00:11:22,980 --> 00:11:27,330
drive in, in, you know,
whatever, 10 minutes I was, was

180
00:11:27,330 --> 00:11:31,350
at the data center. So that
excitement, I think is that

181
00:11:31,350 --> 00:11:35,340
collaboration gives excitement,
and allows you to become much

182
00:11:35,340 --> 00:11:39,240
more of a valuable member than
then you were maybe in the past

183
00:11:39,240 --> 00:11:40,320
and an IT ops job.

184
00:11:40,930 --> 00:11:42,910
Jayne Groll: You know, and it's
funny you say that, because I

185
00:11:42,910 --> 00:11:46,840
think one of the areas of
essary, there really shows how

186
00:11:46,840 --> 00:11:50,560
important collaboration is
incident management. So in your

187
00:11:50,560 --> 00:11:53,200
experience, in my experience,
right, an incident occurs,

188
00:11:53,320 --> 00:11:56,530
everybody goes not my fault, not
my fault, right? You spend half

189
00:11:56,530 --> 00:11:58,960
your time trying to figure out
what change because it hasn't

190
00:11:58,960 --> 00:12:03,010
been captured, or documented
anywhere. And it becomes this

191
00:12:03,070 --> 00:12:06,820
like hot potato of a ticket in
an ITSM system being passed

192
00:12:06,820 --> 00:12:10,390
around according to some
escalation path, and you have 15

193
00:12:10,390 --> 00:12:14,590
minutes to get it and two hours
to fix it or whatever. And it

194
00:12:14,590 --> 00:12:17,710
becomes a follow the pointing
finger. Right. So like, you

195
00:12:17,710 --> 00:12:21,250
know, it's very non
collaborative. In SRE, there's a

196
00:12:21,250 --> 00:12:23,350
couple of things, I think that
really showcase that

197
00:12:23,350 --> 00:12:25,660
collaboration. First of all,
there's an incident command

198
00:12:25,660 --> 00:12:29,560
system, right? Where it isn't
just pass around a ticket, but

199
00:12:29,560 --> 00:12:33,370
there's a collaborative
opportunity to figure out what

200
00:12:33,370 --> 00:12:36,670
change because that's usually
the root cause of an incident,

201
00:12:36,850 --> 00:12:41,170
what change, how do we fix it?
Who can we get involved and, and

202
00:12:41,170 --> 00:12:44,200
instead of playing, you know,
pass the ticket around, it

203
00:12:44,200 --> 00:12:47,110
becomes a collaborative event.
The other side of it, I thought

204
00:12:47,110 --> 00:12:49,990
was really interesting is, if
there's a breach if the service

205
00:12:49,990 --> 00:12:53,860
level objectives are breached,
because of an incident, all

206
00:12:54,310 --> 00:12:57,580
innovative work stops, right,
all new work stops until they

207
00:12:57,580 --> 00:13:00,550
figure out what caused the
breach. Now, for a business that

208
00:13:00,550 --> 00:13:04,540
can be very disruptive. So who
wants to breach? Nobody? Right?

209
00:13:04,630 --> 00:13:08,380
One of the disappointing parts,
I think that we found in the

210
00:13:08,410 --> 00:13:12,400
survey was that service level
objectives were not necessarily

211
00:13:12,400 --> 00:13:16,060
the first thing that
organizations did, we saw that

212
00:13:16,060 --> 00:13:19,660
in ITIL, as well, we're Service
Level Management was was later

213
00:13:19,660 --> 00:13:23,260
hopefully, we can flip the model
on that. But it shows a

214
00:13:23,260 --> 00:13:27,580
collaborative spirit, that
instead of just pointing out it

215
00:13:27,580 --> 00:13:31,210
wasn't me, or it was you and we
follow that pointing finger,

216
00:13:31,390 --> 00:13:36,430
that there isn't ever to work
together, and to solve problems

217
00:13:36,430 --> 00:13:39,190
together. And hopefully, that,
first of all transfers

218
00:13:39,190 --> 00:13:42,490
knowledge, but also helps to
reduce toil, because in order to

219
00:13:42,490 --> 00:13:45,670
reduce toil or technical debt,
you first have to accept that

220
00:13:45,670 --> 00:13:49,390
it's there. Yeah. And so you
know, so I think there's some

221
00:13:49,390 --> 00:13:52,450
pieces of that, what do you
think about that SLO piece? So

222
00:13:52,450 --> 00:13:54,040
why do you think that's a
struggle?

223
00:13:54,370 --> 00:13:57,580
Eveline Oehrlich: Yeah, I think
the the challenge of it has

224
00:13:57,730 --> 00:14:03,100
always been really defining what
it is they are delivering from

225
00:14:03,100 --> 00:14:06,670
an outcome perspective and the
conversation between those who

226
00:14:06,670 --> 00:14:09,640
are creating it, or those who
are fixing it, and those who are

227
00:14:09,640 --> 00:14:13,270
operating it. And those who are
actually consuming it be at the

228
00:14:13,270 --> 00:14:16,570
employee level of systems of
record or system of engagements

229
00:14:16,570 --> 00:14:19,300
at the customer level, those
conversations are very, very

230
00:14:19,300 --> 00:14:22,840
difficult to have, and then put
that into some kind of a

231
00:14:22,840 --> 00:14:27,730
perspective. I remember one
conversation at my job at

232
00:14:27,730 --> 00:14:32,830
Forrester, where a gentleman was
asking me to help him move from

233
00:14:32,860 --> 00:14:40,150
a 99.4 nines, right 99.9999
availability to five nines. And

234
00:14:40,150 --> 00:14:44,320
so of course, as an analyst, my
question was, why would you want

235
00:14:44,320 --> 00:14:49,180
to do that? And he had no
answer. He really didn't have an

236
00:14:49,180 --> 00:14:52,870
answer. So we actually
calculated for him, he just

237
00:14:52,870 --> 00:14:56,710
thought that was the right thing
to do. We didn't calculate it

238
00:14:56,710 --> 00:15:00,730
that what it would cost for him
to actually do that. And he was

239
00:15:00,730 --> 00:15:04,210
like, Oh my gosh, I don't think
my business will fund that. So,

240
00:15:04,360 --> 00:15:07,570
right, the the conversation of
having a service level

241
00:15:07,570 --> 00:15:12,160
objective, which is tied to an
SLA, and is defined through

242
00:15:12,160 --> 00:15:17,410
SLIs, becomes difficult to
define. And as we are in this

243
00:15:17,410 --> 00:15:22,540
digital world as things, our
customer experience and employee

244
00:15:22,540 --> 00:15:27,010
experience is like the utmost
goal of everybody, how is it

245
00:15:27,010 --> 00:15:30,460
defined? What's the benchmark?
How do I capture that? And I

246
00:15:30,460 --> 00:15:33,490
think that's the challenge.
There's plenty of more work to

247
00:15:33,490 --> 00:15:37,630
do to understand how and what
and I think it's really a matter

248
00:15:37,630 --> 00:15:41,080
of bringing people together
across the value stream, looking

249
00:15:41,080 --> 00:15:46,600
at from the outside in, what is
it we want to do versus what we

250
00:15:46,600 --> 00:15:48,730
and it think we should be doing?

251
00:15:49,650 --> 00:15:52,770
Jayne Groll: Absolutely. And you
know, the other thing about SRE

252
00:15:52,770 --> 00:15:55,650
that I find particularly
fascinating, is while there's a

253
00:15:55,650 --> 00:15:59,220
series of books that were
published by Google, that isn't

254
00:15:59,430 --> 00:16:03,330
necessarily the you know, the
body of knowledge or the

255
00:16:03,330 --> 00:16:07,140
prescriptive guidance, or it
isn't religious, right, and we

256
00:16:07,140 --> 00:16:10,410
say some of these frameworks
became religious. And so now,

257
00:16:10,530 --> 00:16:14,970
we've grafted other things into
this umbrella of essary, like

258
00:16:15,000 --> 00:16:18,450
observability, or chaos
engineering, right? Things that

259
00:16:18,450 --> 00:16:21,930
would have existed outside of
it, and could have been part of

260
00:16:21,930 --> 00:16:26,070
framework wars, right. But now,
you know, this whole concept of

261
00:16:26,070 --> 00:16:29,130
IT operations under Site
Reliability, or systems,

262
00:16:29,130 --> 00:16:35,700
reliability engineering, now,
graphs, other practices. So what

263
00:16:35,700 --> 00:16:37,740
are you seeing in that
direction? I think, because

264
00:16:37,740 --> 00:16:41,310
again, as a human, that gives me
new opportunities, collaborate

265
00:16:41,310 --> 00:16:43,590
gives me new things to learn,
like observability, in

266
00:16:43,590 --> 00:16:50,070
particular, I think is just
really risen, as practices that

267
00:16:50,070 --> 00:16:51,660
are considered part of that
surgery.

268
00:16:52,200 --> 00:16:54,150
Eveline Oehrlich: Yeah. So on
the people side, if I, if I

269
00:16:54,150 --> 00:16:57,150
think of it from people process
technology, from a people side,

270
00:16:57,150 --> 00:17:01,140
I think, individuals who are
really looking for a new career,

271
00:17:01,350 --> 00:17:04,830
this is a great way to get into
engineering, if you are an

272
00:17:04,830 --> 00:17:08,220
operations professional, get,
you know, get yourself some

273
00:17:08,250 --> 00:17:13,890
upskilling and move. That's one
thing. from a leadership

274
00:17:13,890 --> 00:17:18,330
perspective, I think having the
perspective to look at those

275
00:17:18,330 --> 00:17:21,000
people you have in your team and
give them the chance to maybe

276
00:17:21,000 --> 00:17:25,140
shift to a role like that is
another thing. And then maybe

277
00:17:25,140 --> 00:17:27,150
from an organizational
perspective, that's still around

278
00:17:27,150 --> 00:17:30,420
people, maybe we need to think
about how we organize our teams

279
00:17:30,420 --> 00:17:34,680
a little bit different from a
process perspective. All these

280
00:17:34,770 --> 00:17:37,650
things we mentioned, you know,
knowledge management, incident

281
00:17:37,650 --> 00:17:41,160
management, configuration
management, right? The evil

282
00:17:41,160 --> 00:17:45,900
CMDBA, the CMDB, yes, or no, or
change management, all these

283
00:17:45,900 --> 00:17:50,370
things will become more natural.
And then from a technology

284
00:17:50,370 --> 00:17:54,180
perspective, everybody wants to
go to the cloud, we know we have

285
00:17:54,240 --> 00:17:58,380
to go to the cloud organizations
are shifting, but there is

286
00:17:58,380 --> 00:18:03,990
opportunities as well to become
a kind of a stack person around

287
00:18:03,990 --> 00:18:07,320
the cloud. Now, one thing I want
to make sure everybody knows

288
00:18:07,470 --> 00:18:11,430
this SRE is not just for
companies who are in the cloud

289
00:18:11,460 --> 00:18:15,030
or going to the cloud, we see a
lot of organizations who have

290
00:18:15,030 --> 00:18:17,820
very mixed and hybrid
environments who are applying

291
00:18:17,820 --> 00:18:22,620
sre. And even in the mainframe,
there isn't really a perfect

292
00:18:22,620 --> 00:18:28,620
technology stack for adopting
SRE. SRE is more of how and what

293
00:18:28,620 --> 00:18:33,240
you do rather than around a
specific technology. So let me

294
00:18:33,240 --> 00:18:38,010
ask you a question. Jane. What
about next year? What's your

295
00:18:38,010 --> 00:18:40,920
prediction for next year? And I
hope we will do the research

296
00:18:40,920 --> 00:18:45,120
again. And we'll look forward to
of course, do it in the same

297
00:18:45,120 --> 00:18:50,970
cadence. We usually do our
survey around the November

298
00:18:50,970 --> 00:18:54,180
September timeframe. And then
sorry, in May and then

299
00:18:54,180 --> 00:18:57,840
republished around July. So any
predictions for next year?

300
00:18:58,590 --> 00:19:01,470
Jayne Groll: Yeah, I think SRE
is going to continue to be

301
00:19:01,470 --> 00:19:06,300
adopted by organizations. I
think that, you know, if we look

302
00:19:06,300 --> 00:19:09,420
at kind of the evolution of
practices, starting with agile,

303
00:19:09,420 --> 00:19:14,370
which is, what, 20 years ago,
now over 20 years ago, and you

304
00:19:14,370 --> 00:19:17,910
know, kind of the scaling of
agile and then DevOps, which is

305
00:19:17,940 --> 00:19:22,230
11/12 years ago, and looking at
how do we shift left? And how do

306
00:19:22,230 --> 00:19:25,410
we, you know, adopt more
automation and the human

307
00:19:25,410 --> 00:19:28,830
collaboration, it feels like
essary is that third piece of

308
00:19:28,830 --> 00:19:34,380
the puzzle. And I think that
organizations will start to see

309
00:19:34,410 --> 00:19:36,630
and there'll be more case
studies that are released, of

310
00:19:36,630 --> 00:19:40,950
course, our report will do will
do every year. And I think

311
00:19:41,160 --> 00:19:45,540
there'll be a migration because
the digital first world which

312
00:19:45,540 --> 00:19:48,480
we're moving into, and we got
pushed into maybe a little

313
00:19:48,480 --> 00:19:52,590
faster than we thought we would.
You're right, you don't have to

314
00:19:52,590 --> 00:19:56,130
be in the cloud to adopt SRE
practices, right. It's just

315
00:19:56,130 --> 00:20:00,210
about good practices and IT
operations but I think also It's

316
00:20:00,210 --> 00:20:04,290
gonna break some of the barriers
that we've seen with say IT

317
00:20:04,290 --> 00:20:08,580
Service Management that have
always been, there's some really

318
00:20:08,580 --> 00:20:12,090
great guidance and IT Service
Management. But there's always

319
00:20:12,090 --> 00:20:16,140
been a disconnect, say between
those that are pre production

320
00:20:16,140 --> 00:20:18,780
and those that are post
production. And SRE seems to

321
00:20:18,780 --> 00:20:22,650
break down those those walls. I
think that the job, we're gonna

322
00:20:22,650 --> 00:20:26,970
see more and more people really
start to move into those roles,

323
00:20:26,970 --> 00:20:30,030
regardless of what their history
was whether they came from

324
00:20:30,030 --> 00:20:33,510
opposite they came from dev,
right. So I see this trending

325
00:20:33,510 --> 00:20:38,010
faster, because the definition
of IT operations is no longer no

326
00:20:38,010 --> 00:20:42,420
ops, we called it "new ops" five
years ago. And I think SRE is

327
00:20:42,420 --> 00:20:47,760
really new ops, and it will
build very, very rapidly,

328
00:20:47,760 --> 00:20:51,030
probably more rapidly than agile
or DevOps. What do you think?

329
00:20:51,030 --> 00:20:52,200
What do you see next year?

330
00:20:52,470 --> 00:20:55,140
Eveline Oehrlich: Yeah, I agree.
Absolutely agree. And I'm a

331
00:20:55,140 --> 00:21:00,270
little bit disappointed in us in
the analyst community at the

332
00:21:00,270 --> 00:21:03,780
time that we did not come up
with that term Site Reliability

333
00:21:03,780 --> 00:21:08,460
Engineering, and we talked about
new ops. But yes, I think the it

334
00:21:08,460 --> 00:21:15,090
gives a complete new career path
and allows for a, an engineering

335
00:21:15,090 --> 00:21:19,530
path for young folks to get into
the millennials of today, as we

336
00:21:19,530 --> 00:21:23,340
know, they're very different. I
have to at home, they don't have

337
00:21:23,370 --> 00:21:27,600
it careers, but I do see how
they click and how they work. So

338
00:21:27,600 --> 00:21:31,590
for them, I think that's going
to be a great opportunity. All

339
00:21:31,590 --> 00:21:35,940
right. Well, for anybody
listening in, Jane, thank you.

340
00:21:35,940 --> 00:21:40,230
This was fantastic. Appreciate
your time. We have a report

341
00:21:40,230 --> 00:21:45,090
anybody listening in if you are
a fantastic case study on SRE,

342
00:21:45,090 --> 00:21:49,050
reach out if you need some ideas
on how to upskill reach out, you

343
00:21:49,050 --> 00:21:52,290
know, where we where we are, the
report can be found on the

344
00:21:52,290 --> 00:21:56,700
DevOps Institute comm. website.
If you have questions, comments,

345
00:21:56,730 --> 00:22:01,080
we are happy to entertain.
Great, thank you. This was a

346
00:22:01,080 --> 00:22:06,150
very easy first podcast for me.
Thank you for being so easy to

347
00:22:06,240 --> 00:22:09,450
transition into this role. Have
a great day and thank you,

348
00:22:09,450 --> 00:22:09,990
everybody.

349
00:22:10,380 --> 00:22:12,360
Jayne Groll: Thanks, Evelyn.
Thanks, everyone.

