The Brutal Murder of Telenovela Star, Daniella Perez | Brazil
[Evidence Locker True Crime Podcast]
It was close to 10pm on December 28, 1992. Lawyer Hugo da Silveira was driving along Avenida das Américas in Rio de Janeiro when he noticed something unusual. Two cars were pulled over on the side of the road, their headlights casting long beams into a patch of thick underbrush. Three figures were visible near the tree line. One of them – a woman – seemed to be resisting. The other two, a man and a woman, were pulling her toward the brush.
Something about the scene unsettled him. Hugo slowed his car, took note of the license plates, and drove on. He didn’t yet know what he had witnessed – but he would remember it clearly.
That night, 22-year-old actress Daniella Perez never came home. By the next morning, her body would be found – stabbed 18 times and left in the undergrowth.
Her killers? A fellow actor – her on-screen love interest – and his jealous real-life wife.
The murder of Daniella Perez would stun Brazil. The case blurred fiction and reality, exposed the weaknesses of the criminal justice system, and left a nation in mourning for one of their brightest stars.
You are listening to: The Evidence Locker.
Thanks for listening to our podcast. This episode is made possible by our sponsors—be sure to check them out for exclusive deals. For an ad-free experience, join us on Patreon, starting at just $2 a month, with 25% of proceeds supporting The Doe Network, helping to bring closure to international cold cases. Links are in the show notes.
Our episodes cover true crimes involving real people, and some content may be graphic in nature. Listener discretion is advised. We produce each episode with the utmost respect for the victims, their families, and loved ones.
The telenovela is a cultural institution in Brazil. More than just television shows, these serialized dramas become integrated into the very fabric of everyday life, with plot twists and character developments dominating water cooler conversations across the nation. In the early 1990s, one of these telenovelas, De Corpo e Alma (Body and Soul), captured the imagination of millions of viewers. Among its stars was a beautiful young actress and dancer named Daniella Perez, whose life would tragically intertwine with the fiction she portrayed on screen.
Born on August 11, 1970, in Rio de Janeiro, Daniella Ferrante Perez was the daughter of renowned telenovela writer Glória Perez and engineer Luiz Carlos Saupiquet Perez. From a young age, it was clear that Daniella had inherited her mother's creative spirit. When she was five years old she began formal dance training, eventually performing professionally with the prestigious Rio de Janeiro dance company Vacilou, Dançou.
Daniella's exceptional talent and natural charisma made her transition to television almost inevitable. Her screen debut came as a tango dancer in the Rede Manchete novela Kananga do Japão. It was on this set that she met her future husband, actor Raul Gazolla. Their relationship was one of genuine affection and mutual support – a far cry from the toxic dynamics that would later claim her life.
Following her TV debut, Daniella's star continued to rise with roles in popular telenovelas such as Barriga de Aluguel (Surrogate Belly) in 1990 and O Dono do Mundo (The Owner of the World) in 1991. But it was in 1992 that she landed what would become her most recognized role: Yasmin Bianchi in De Corpo e Alma, a telenovela created by her mother, Glória Perez.
Daniella’s character, Yasmin, was the sister of the protagonist Paloma Bianchi. The show explored complex themes including organ donation and personal identity, captivating audiences across Brazil who tuned in religiously during prime time. As the character of Yasmin became more popular, so did Daniella, earning the affectionate nickname "Brazil's Sweetheart."
Those who knew Daniella personally described her as kind-hearted and authentic. Unlike some celebrities who become jaded by fame, she remained approachable and gracious, always making time for her fans. On December 25, 1992, just days before her murder, she played Mary, the mother of Jesus, in a Christmas special titled Roberto Carlos Especial, appearing alongside respected actors Cássia Kis Magro and Herson Capri.
Playing opposite Daniella in De Corpo e Alma was the dashingly handsome Guilherme de Pádua, who portrayed Bira, a jealous and brooding character who was rejected by Daniella's fiery Yasmin. Their on-screen chemistry was undeniable and it kept viewers glued to their screens. But behind the façade of professional collaboration, a sinister dynamic was developing – one that would ultimately end in tragedy.
The set of De Corpo e Alma was, in many ways, a microcosm of the Brazilian entertainment industry itself. TV Globo's sprawling production center in Jacarepaguá, known as Projac, was where dreams were made or broken, where careers soared or stagnated. For established actors, it was a workplace. For newcomers like Guilherme de Pádua, it was a ladder to climb – by any means necessary.
Guilherme's path to television had been unconventional. Before landing the role of Bira, he had worked as a male stripper and had appeared in gay pornographic magazines – details he tried to keep hidden as he pursued mainstream success. According to colleagues interviewed in HBO's docuseries, A Brutal Pact – The Murder of Daniella Perez, Guilherme was obsessively focused on becoming a star, viewing his role in De Corpo e Alma not as an artistic opportunity but as a stepping stone to greater fame and fortune.
In contrast, Daniella Perez approached her work with genuine passion for the craft. While she certainly benefited from being the daughter of the show's creator, those who worked with her emphasised that she had earned her role through talent and hard work. On set, she was known for her professionalism, arriving prepared and treating everyone – from lead actors to crew members – with respect.
This fundamental difference in attitude created an underlying tension. Cast members later recalled that Guilherme would frequently complain about his character's development, believing that he deserved more screen time and more dramatic storylines. He seemed particularly resentful of scenes that focused on Daniella, perceiving her success as somehow coming at his expense. Crew members recalled that Guilherme often kept a close watch on set, even during scenes he wasn’t in. Some noted that he seemed especially focused when Daniella was filming and described his demeanour at times as intense and unusually fixated on how much screen time she received.
Adding another layer of complexity to this toxic brew was Paula Thomaz, Guilherme's young wife. Just 19 years old and heavily pregnant with their first child, Paula began visiting the set more and more often. While it wasn't unusual for family members to occasionally observe filming, Paula's presence became a source of discomfort for many, particularly during romantic scenes between Guilherme and Daniella.
According to multiple accounts shared in A Brutal Pact, Paula would sit silently during these scenes, her eyes never leaving Daniella. When the director called "cut," she would immediately approach her husband, often whispering intensely in his ear. Several crew members noted that Guilherme’s demeanour would change after these interactions, becoming noticeably colder toward Daniella.
The jealousy wasn't entirely one-sided. Guilherme himself fed into Paula's insecurities, later admitting to investigators that he had told his wife that Daniella was flirting with him – a claim vehemently denied by everyone who knew the actress and contradicted by her deep love and commitment to her husband, Raul Gazolla.
As filming progressed, the emotional temperature on set continued to rise. In late November 1992, about a month before the murder, a pivotal incident occurred that, in retrospect, should have raised a red flag. During a scene in which Bira was supposed to angrily confront Yasmin, Guilherme allegedly grabbed Daniella with excessive force. When the director called him out for his aggression, Guilherme dismissed it as "staying in character." According to Daniella's husband, Raul Gazolla, Daniella had told him:
"Guilherme is weird, he grabs me too hard during scenes."
Daniella, ever the professional, downplayed the incident. According to her mother's later testimony, she mentioned it casually at home that evening but insisted it was nothing to worry about. In a 2022 interview, Glória Perez recalled:
"She was always so generous with other actors. She didn't want to make trouble for anyone, even when perhaps she should have."
What no one realised at the time was that Guilherme was constructing an elaborate fantasy in his mind – one in which Daniella was deliberately sabotaging his career. This delusion found fertile ground in conversations with his wife, who reinforced the idea that Daniella was somehow using her mother's influence to minimise Guilherme's role in the telenovela.
However, to the contrary, speculation arose that Glória Perez had actually been planning to expand Bira's storyline in upcoming episodes. Far from trying to sideline the character, the production was allegedly preparing to give the actor more opportunities to showcase his talent. But by then, the deadly plan was already taking shape in the minds of Guilherme de Pádua and Paula Thomaz.
The weeks leading up to December 28, 1992, were filled with ominous signs that, tragically, were only recognised in hindsight. Cast members later recalled that Guilherme had become increasingly erratic on set, alternating between excessive charm and sullen withdrawal.
That fateful Monday began like any other day for 22-year-old Daniella. She had breakfast with her husband, Raul Gazolla, before having lunch with her mother, Glória. Afterward, she ran some personal errands before heading to Projac, TV Globo's production center in Jacarepaguá, Rio de Janeiro, for filming.
That day on set was busy but routine. Despite her packed schedule, Daniella, always kind and obliging, took time to pose for photographs with children and fans who had gathered outside the studio. It was a small gesture that meant the world to her admirers, but for Daniella, it was simply part of her day – a reflection of her genuine appreciation for those who supported her work.
The shooting schedule that day included several scenes, but none involving direct interaction between Daniella and Guilherme. As filming wrapped up that day, Guilherme approached Daniella with an unusual request. He wanted to speak with her privately, away from the busy set. He suggested meeting at a nearby gas station. Perhaps trusting in the professional nature of their relationship or simply being her characteristically accommodating self, Daniella agreed.
What Daniella couldn't have known was that this suggestion wasn't spontaneous. Cell phone records would later show multiple calls between Guilherme and his wife throughout the day, with a final call just minutes before he approached Daniella. According to Paula's eventual testimony, they had discussed their plan that morning before Guilherme left for work, with Paula agreeing to meet him at the studio.
One of the most heartrending aspects of this case is how preventable it seems in when looking back. If Daniella had declined the meeting, if she had suggested they speak the next day on set, if she had asked someone to go with her – any small change might have changed the course of events. But Daniella, always trusting and professional, agreed to the meeting, unwittingly sealing her own fate.
After leaving the studio in their separate vehicles, Daniella and Guilherme headed to the agreed-upon location. What Daniella didn't know was that Paula had joined Guilherme and was in his car with him. As Daniella drove through a secluded area along Avenida das Américas in Barra da Tijuca, a western zone of Rio de Janeiro, Guilherme forced her off the road with his vehicle. According to later testimonies, they got out of their cars and a confrontation ensued. Soon, a heavily pregnant Paula got out of the car and joined in the argument.
It was here, at this desolate location surrounded by vegetation, that lawyer Hugo da Silveira witnessed the three figures in a struggle – not realizing he was observing a prelude to murder.
In a brutal act of violence, Daniella Perez was stabbed 18 times with a double-edged knife. The wounds were concentrated on vital areas – her neck, lungs, and heart – suggesting not just an intent to kill but a frenzied determination to ensure death. The autopsy would later reveal defensive wounds on Daniella's hands and arms, indicating that she had fought desperately for her life before succumbing to her injuries.
After the savage attack, the killers left Daniella's body in the thicket, making a half-hearted attempt to stage the scene as a robbery gone wrong. They stripped her of her jewellery but left her with her identification.
When Daniella did not return home after work, her husband Raul Gazolla was worried. He reached out to Glória Perez, who was immediately alarmed – Daniella would never disappear without calling. Together, they began calling friends, hospitals, anyone who might have seen her. As the hours dragged on with no answers, Raul filed a missing person report with police.
Meanwhile, Daniella's body had been discovered by local police responding to a report of an abandoned corpse. The brutality of the crime scene shocked even the most seasoned of officers. Thanks to the killers’ oversight in leaving her ID, police were able to swiftly identify the victim as the beloved telenovela star.
The high-profile investigation into Daniella's murder began straight away. The critical break in the case came from Hugo da Silveira's witness account and the license plate numbers he had recorded. One of these plates was traced back to Guilherme de Pádua, placing him at the scene of the crime.
When detectives brought him in for questioning, they found his behaviour suspicious. He appeared nervous and had visible scratches on his body that he struggled to explain. Initially denying any involvement, the actor’s story began to crumble under questioning, especially when confronted with the evidence of his car being spotted at the crime scene.
Eventually, Guilherme confessed to being present during Daniella's murder but attempted to minimise his role. He claimed that the killing was unplanned and resulted from an argument that escalated unexpectedly. More brazenly, he suggested that Daniella had attacked him first, forcing him to defend himself – a claim that forensic evidence would thoroughly discredit.
Like her husband, Paula Thomaz initially denied involvement in Daniella’s murder, but eventually admitted to being present. The couple's accounts contradicted each other on key details, particularly regarding who had instigated the violence and delivered the fatal blows.
As the investigation deepened, a disturbing picture of premeditation emerged. Because the knife used in the attack had been brought to the scene by the couple, it was clear that this was not a spontaneous crime of passion but a planned execution. Moreover, witnesses from the De Corpo e Alma set reported overhearing Guilherme make threatening remarks about Daniella in the days leading up to the murder.
The murder brought the set of De Corpo e Alma to a standstill. Production was temporarily halted as everyone struggled to process what had happened. When filming resumed a week later, the atmosphere was somber and tense. Many crew members reported difficulty focusing on their work, with some breaking down in tears between takes.
For the actors who had worked closely with both Daniella and Guilherme, the emotional impact was devastating. They were forced to confront not only the loss of a beloved colleague but also the realisation that they had worked alongside someone capable of violent murder. Several cast members required psychological counselling to cope with the trauma.
In the documentary A Brutal Pact, one actress described the eerie feeling of watching earlier episodes in which Daniella and Guilherme appeared together, knowing what would eventually unfold. She recalled:
"There's a scene where he grabs her arm… Watching it now, knowing what he would later do to her... it makes my blood run cold."
The production team faced an unprecedented challenge: how to continue a telenovela when one actor has been murdered by another. Glória Perez, displaying remarkable courage and professionalism, took on the painful task of rewriting upcoming episodes. Daniella's character, Yasmin, was written out with a brief explanation that she had moved abroad. Guilherme’s character disappeared without explanation, his name never mentioned again on the show. It was a conscious decision not to sensationalize the real-life tragedy within the fictional narrative.
Many viewers reported feeling a surreal disconnect watching the final episodes featuring Daniella that had been filmed before her death but aired after her murder. There was something deeply unsettling about seeing her alive on screen while knowing she was gone – a blurring of fiction and reality that struck at the heart of what makes telenovelas such a powerful cultural force in Brazil.
The show continued production until its scheduled conclusion in March 1993, but something had fundamentally changed. The fantasy world that millions of Brazilians escaped into each evening had been shattered by the intrusion of real-world violence. The remaining cast members completed their work with a sense of obligation to Daniella's memory, but the production simply wasn’t the same as before.
The trial of Guilherme de Pádua and Paula Thomaz began in 1997, four years after the crime, highlighting the often-slow pace of Brazil's justice system. Both were charged with qualified homicide, a classification that acknowledges aggravating factors such as premeditation and the victim's inability to defend herself.
The courtroom proceedings were heavily covered by the media, with Brazilians following every development. Guilherme maintained that he only reacted in self-defence, while his lawyers attempted to portray Daniella as the aggressor – a strategy that outraged both the public and those who had known the gentle-spirited actress.
Paula Thomaz's defense took a different approach, attempting to portray her as a manipulated young woman under the influence of her older husband. This strategy was undermined by witness accounts of her active participation in the crime and her history of jealous behaviour toward Daniella.
After deliberation, both defendants were found guilty. Each received a sentence of 19 years in prison. However, due to Brazil's penal system regulations at the time, which allowed for significant sentence reductions and parole opportunities, both would serve only about six years before being released – Guilherme de Pádua in 1999 and Paula Thomaz in 2004.
The shockingly lenient actual prison terms served by Daniella's killers catalyzed a profound legal change in Brazil. Glória Perez, channelling her immeasurable grief into activism, launched a campaign to reform the country's criminal code. She collected over 1.3 million signatures on a petition calling for harsher penalties for murder.
Her efforts bore fruit. In 1994, the Brazilian Congress passed Law 8.930, which reclassified qualified homicide as a heinous crime. This change significantly increased the minimum time convicted murderers must serve before becoming eligible for parole or other sentence reductions. While this legal victory could not bring back her daughter, it ensured that future victims of violent crime would receive greater justice than Daniella had.
After their release, the killers, who divorced shortly after the trial, attempted to rebuild their lives, with varying degrees of public contrition. Paula Thomaz changed her name to Paula Nogueira Peixoto and maintained a low profile, eventually remarrying and having more children.
Guilherme de Pádua on the other hand, took a more public path. He became an evangelical pastor in Belo Horizonte, founding the Recomeço Ministry (Ministry of New Beginnings), which worked with prison populations. This career choice was met with scepticism and outrage by many Brazilians, who questioned the sincerity of his religious conversion.
Under pressure from his congregation, Guilherme de Pádua eventually recorded a video apologising for his crime. However, the apology was widely perceived as insincere, particularly when he prefaced it by saying he was making the video because "the faithful of my church said I had to." Raul Gazolla, Daniella's widower, later commented on this supposed apology, saying:
"Some people who were more spiritually evolved than me said: 'Gazolla, you have to forgive. If you forgive, you'll be better.' I forgive anything in anyone who has repented. But in all the interviews this killer gave, he always said with his nose in the air: 'what had to happen happened.' The truth is that he didn't regret it, he never showed any remorse."
On November 6, 2022, Guilherme de Pádua died of a heart attack at the age of 53. His death came just months after the release of HBO Max's five-part docuseries A Brutal Pact: The Murder of Daniella Perez, which reignited public interest in the case and shed new light on the events surrounding the murder. When asked about the death of his wife’s murderer, Raul Gazolla suggested that the documentary had "killed" Guilherme de Pádua by exposing the full truth of his actions to a new generation.
Thirty years after her death, Daniella Perez's legacy endures in Brazil's cultural memory. For Glória Perez, the pain of losing her daughter never diminished. In interviews, she has spoken about how suddenly the memories of that terrible night can return:
"All the suffering of the night I went to look for my only daughter, who had been stabbed and dumped in a thicket, came back. And also the pain of the years of struggle, of public exposure, of waiting for the trial. The weight of all that fell on me; it was seven years in a second."
Yet through her advocacy, Glória ensured that her daughter's death would lead to meaningful change. The legal reforms sparked by Daniella's case have provided greater justice for countless victims of violent crime in Brazil, a country where impunity has historically been a significant problem.
The case of Daniella Perez shows how fame can offer no protection from danger, and how the lines between fiction and reality can blur in unexpected and devastating ways. In the world of telenovelas, stories unfold with clear arcs and tidy resolutions. But what happened to Daniella left behind a lasting sense of grief, and a justice system forced to reckon with its own shortcomings. In reality, some endings don’t come neatly. Some leave questions, and pain, that linger for years.
If you'd like to dive deeper into this case, check out the resources we used for this episode in the show notes.
Don’t forget to follow us on social media for more updates on today's case – you can find us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and X. We also have a channel on YouTube where you can watch more content.
If you enjoy what we do here at Evidence Locker, please subscribe on Apple Podcasts or wherever you're listening right now and consider leaving us a 5-star review.
This was The Evidence Locker. Thank you for listening!