Andy: Hello, and welcome to another episode of Page 94.

My name's Andrew Hunter Murray, and I'm here in the Private Eye Office with

Helen Lewis, Adam McQueen and Ian Hislop.

It's too hot.

At least two of the members of this podcast have breached the Shorts Rubicon.

but we're going to try and cool ourselves down by taking ourselves north, several

hundred miles to Scotland, where Nicholas Sturgeon, uh, former first minister for

what was over eight years, last seen, I think by a lot of listeners to this

podcast, or lots of people who are even, you know, pretty up with the news, um,

being arrested before being released, uh, and having a crime scene tent erected

in her garden, all sorts of fun stuff.

She has written a new memoir, which has been, received as being very frank.

In fact, it's called frankly, it's, uh, had a lot of serialization, a

lot of hype, and it seems to be a chance to appraise the whole kind of

Sturgeon project such as it was or is.

And the fact the whole of the SMP and Ian, you have a special expertise

of this 'cause you spent many years receiving lots of correspondence from

readers north of the border, I believe.

Ian: Yes.

a lot of Scottish readers wrote in over the last decade saying,

why don't you cover Scotland?

And then whenever we covered Scotland, they said, you patronizing bastards.

Why don't you leave Nicola Sturgeon alone?

Um, you have no idea.

Uh, what a great leader she is, certainly compared to yours.

Do you want Boris Johnson slash whoever is in Theresa May she?

Soon.

Now we've got Nicola Sturgeon.

so the correspondence, which again, doesn't say that anymore, there

was a fairly dramatic reversal.

Um, but this, I think is, is an attempt to, certainly an attempt by, um, Nicholas

Sturgeon to rehabilitate herself.

, And again, any memoir that says frankly on it, is gonna get people to say,

well, really, um, and I noticed one of the blurbs said Alan Johnson former,

uh, labor Home Secretary, he said, um, he described the quality of the

book as unflinching honesty, and even on the, , extracts, which I've read.

I, I feel politicians should remember when talking about other politicians

that their standards of unflinching honesty aren't necessarily ours.

I remember one of the quotes, from Nicholas Sturgeon was about the SNP

finances, and she said at one point, we're not talking about the finances.

There's nothing wrong with the finances.

I mean, she was a cos signatory of the SNP finances with, with her husband

and with the treasurer, Colin Beatie.

Um, so, there are questions to be addressed and whether they are, I'm.

I'm

Obviously very interested in the money 'cause I found the camper

Van very funny and the one of the longest police investigations ever.

Um, which the Scottish police were a trifle slow.

Having a look into the finances of the governing party running Scotland,

the reasons that are not fully discussed so far in the extract.

I mean, Helen will talk about the other, um, integrity and honesty issues, um,

in, in, in the Scottish government.

But I think, so far we've had a, a, a bit of a gush on this book.

and I'll be interested to see where it goes.

Andy: Can we

just remind ourselves what the camper Van was?

Adam: So the camper Van was, uh, allegedly, uh, purchased with money

that was supposed to go, there was supposed to be ring fenced, wasn't

it, for a second

Helen: was whether or not it was a campaign vehicle, essentially

that was whether or not it was for official purposes only or whether

or not it was being, to use to tour the Highlands and Islands, I

Adam: But it turned out to be parked on the driveway of Peter

Mull Nichols, Sturgeon's husband and chair of the SMPs um, a mother, yeah.

Yes.

Who, and she I think was about 92 and didn't drive, certainly

didn't drive large camper Van.

So it all did look

Ian: Yeah.

And they did actually have the battle bus, the SMP.

So this would've been a reserve

battle

bus.

Andy: Well, often, often a super yacht will have another yacht behind

it, won't it, to carry the boring things in the staff, you know?

So I think that all sounds

Helen: fine.

I mean, we should say, um, Peter Morrow's still under investigation.

He appeared in court in March and, and to no plea.

He's got, um, talking about the camp fund being impounded.

He's got legal aid.

He was just granted last month because his assets are frozen and he's unemployed.

Andy: So

are the charges that are being

Helen: He, yeah, he's, he's still care basing charges.

Against Sturgeon there is no further investigation nor

against, uh, Colin Beatie.

But yeah, she talked about that as you know, saying it was, it was incredibly

traumatic being under investigation.

It was the worst time of her life.

And then there's a delicious little sentence in it where she says,

nothing I am saying here reflects on anyway about Peter's situation.

You think, oh, it's a bit harsh.

You were, you weren't married to him.

You could probably be a bit more effusive in your praise for him.

They're now in the process.

They're separated in the process of divorcing.

But Ian, you're exactly right.

The thing always has, has been annoying about this all the way along is that

she would say it's very un feminist to define me in terms of my husband.

And people would go, your husband is the chief executive of the

SNP, of which you are leader.

Like this is, this is a relevant thing that journalists might wanna talk

about.

But from my point of view, the thing that's fascinating when you talk to

people in Scotland, one thing that comes up is that the s and p was too dominant

and the Scottish political culture and, and, uh, was too small and homogenous.

The s and p got kind of into a one party state.

But you know, the way that Hollywood was designed was with the proportional

vote was designed so that you'd usually have coalitions, but they

went through a long period where they were just supremely dominant.

And then all cultural organizations, you know, knew they had to be

within the favor of the s and p.

All the charities knew that, you know, all of that.

It was just, you know, she was not to mention

Ian: the civil service and the

police.

Yeah,

I just

throw that in.

right.

Helen: But

she was kind of, essentially it was King Alex, and then it was Queen Nicola.

And I think that just made for a really unhealthy political culture in

Scotland.

Ian: And the extracts do go into the, um, the row between Alex Salmon, who

was her mentor, and Nicola Sturgeon.

And I mean, she does say at one point, you know, ours was the most successful

partnership in Scottish politics.

And you think, well, not, not at the end, it wasn't.

No.

Um, and there is, there's a real problem in that I noticed the Scottish newspapers

are having a bit of a row because she suggested now that he's dead, um, that he

leaked, uh, some of this information to a newspaper, which the newspaper has denied.

Um, and are you unflinching transparency and honesty when you're having a go

at someone from beyond the grave?

Is,

Is

that fair?

Helen: Oh yeah.

I mean, the reaction to it has been very sharply divided.

Remember, not least because of the, the, the charges against Alex Salmon, which

of which he was acquitted of all of them.

That plus the gender hours.

What caused the break off of Alba?

The breakaway independence party.

That was then, and, and that took lots of both SMP activists, sort of middle-aged

women who had been the backbone of the SMP, walked out into Alba, which was

always a strange thing at the time to go, you know, go into a party led by a guy

who was then under investigation for sex

Yeah.

That was salmon's party.

That was salmon's party.

That was salmon's party, but that they were so teed off with Nicola Sturgeon.

The way she handled the gender route, I think was what the main problem,

more than just her attitude to it, which is that she just said anyone who

disagreed with her was illegitimate.

She said at one point that anyone who disagreed with her on self-identification

of gender was actually racist, which was a very rogue allegation to bring in.

I mean, you could see, you know, transphobic or sexist or whatever.

So they, they were basically just.

Straight up reactionaries, 1950s reactionaries.

That's the only reason anyone would disagree with her.

And that caused a huge amount of ill feeling.

'cause people didn't just feel disagreed with, they felt disrespected by her.

And that's why I think, as you're saying in the reactions has been so strong.

It's not just that people disagree with her, it's just they feel

that she was pious and domineering and that that, and anyone who

disagreed with her was illegitimate.

Which first came up in the context of it, independence, right?

The idea that anyone who didn't vote s and p or didn't want independence

was talking Scotland down.

You didn't believe in Scotland enough to believe that it could be independent.

So there was, people felt that they were, you know, being told

that their views are illegitimate.

And that, and then that same feeling ported onto to gender as well.

Ian: And

in the gender row, it wasn't, um, uh, English liberals or English

reactionaries or English transphobes.

It was Scottish women.

Um,

and so that made certainly the, the, the previous, um, set of

assumptions that anyone who criticizes Nicola Sturgeon is either not

patriotically, Scottish or English,

uh,

Helen: But that's the framing that they

wanted to have.

When, um, the gender recognition reform bill was passed, voted for by all of the

parties except the Scottish Conservatives, which would've brought in self id,

it was then blocked by Alistair Jack, the conservative Scottish secretary.

So that point, it was very neat for the SMP that they were saying, you

know, reactionary old toy voting, England has once again blocked

Scottish enlightened progressivism.

But as you say, there's a brilliant anthology called The Women Who Wouldn't

Wish, which is by all of these activists who did unbelievably large amounts

of unpaid work because the civil servants was just completely on board

with the entire search and agenda.

But yeah, it was always presented as being essentially evil Tory, old England

versus liberal enlightened Scotland.

And that's, that was the framing that really appealed to the SMP during

those years.

Ian: And it, it became accepted in England during COVID in particular

because, any broadcast by Boris was followed by a broadcast by Nicola

Sturgeon in which she looked, not like

him.

Yeah.

And, and that was plenty.

Helen: Yeah, I, I know what you mean.

I think she did have a final renaissance was during COVID because the feeling was

that she was taking it very seriously.

She was being sober.

And in contrast to Boris Johnson saying in March, 2020, I'm still out there

shaking hands, you know, whatever that said that she did, then I think

go too far the other way, which now people are criticizing her for.

So Scotland for example, kept schools closed longer.

Um, you know, she had more virus restrictions.

So, but then those arguments, I mean you can see it's still in America

now are still playing on about exactly how quickly restrictions

should have

been

lifted.

Ian: and

once that reputation she'd got for being much more marvelous than anything

that was going on in English, it meant no criticism was acceptable.

So the Iran pieces about these

two

ferries

that

took decades to produce staggering millions, and then they make

HS two begin to look fast.

Um, it, it's not a specifically English problem.

And there were problems in Scotland, uh, with education, um, with drugs,

with leveling up, all of which were just buried under this assumption that

because you are not an English Tory, therefore you are a huge success.

Andy: So this is what I wanted to ask about really, is there seems to be at the

heart of s and p government they're making two big offers to the electorate, as it

were, The first of which is, we're gonna run Scotland better than, Westminster

politicians can possibly run us.

And the second is independence.

And those both seem to have fallen short.

I mean, obviously the independence referendum in 2014, there's been a

consistent attempt to say, we're gonna have another referendum, we're going to

get an A concession from Westminster, that we will have another one of these.

And the support for independence, I think is about, is roughly where it has

been for some years, which is about 50%.

You know, it's pretty close either way,

but

the odds of another referendum seem quite slim

at the

Helen: John Sweeney, current first minister does not seem to be holding

it out as the kind of shining grail over the hill in the way that I

think both salmon and Sturgeon did.

And, and you are right in post 'cause you remember immediately

after the affair referendums 2014 and then the 2015 election, general

election, the s and p just cleans up.

It's

just a

wipe

out across Scotland.

So there was this sense that although they'd lost the

referendum, they had won this sort of larger moral victory, I think.

But that's been eroded, you know, their power sharing agreement

with the greens collapsed.

Um, we lost, uh, hums Yusef in, you know, didn't last very long as first minister.

They're in a much more kind of humble position than they

were, and I think that's why.

Probably, I mean, I also think Nicholas Sturgeon has wanted to

write this memoir because she's a genuine lover of literature and,

and books and reading like that.

I don't think that is famed for the cameras at all.

She's one of the few people who still reads literary

fiction with genuine pleasure.

But I,

I am really kind of fascinated because it, as Ian's saying, it's, it's.

Billing itself

was kind

of complete

transparency, but she doesn't actually want to concede that she was wrong in uh,

uh, in anything that I've seen her doing.

The gender era being really obvious, right, in that there was a rabbi

about sending a biologically male rapist to a woman's prison.

And she said at the time, you know, I don't, I, you know, the

individuals a rapist when asked if they were man or a woman.

And now she sort of says, well, probably, actually, probably I got that one wrong.

And you're like, but okay, well if you think you did maybe get that

one

wrong,

why did you think it was completely illegitimate for anyone to

disagree with you at the time?

Explain what changed your mind and what you'd like to say to the people

on the other side of that debate.

This is the bit, maybe this is in the book, we haven't read it.

That comes out on Thursday, but that's what, that's the bit I'm

struggling with at the moment.

Ian: the joke in the eyes always, all political memoirs should be called, I

Was Right and Everyone else was wrong.

And this one is being billed as, this isn't like, um, other political memoirs

and what I've read so far, it is,

um,

uh, she was right about nearly everything and possibly for perfectly

good reasons wrong about various other things and some other things

she can't talk about, uh, because there's still an ongoing investigation.

So.

Frankly, yeah.

Andy: Ish is, is part of this just the kind of inevitable tension

between having run somewhere for nearly 20 years, which is how long

the s and p have been in office in Scotland under their various leaders.

And now that's the sort of time span over which you would expect to have

memoirs coming out saying, well, this is what it was like when I was in,

and this is, you know, this is why I made the decisions I did and why

they've turned out the way they have.

But the s and p is still in office, so it's sort of not quite a natural

time for this book to be out.

Now you'd, you'd normally have that after an election that's gone the other way.

Ian: And I think because this.

The police investigation into the, you know, the hierarchy of the governments

running the country took so long and was so delayed and, and, in the end managed

not to date, to have got very far, um, in terms of explaining what happened with

any of this, um, everyone was quiet, so they didn't publish their own memoirs.

I haven't read books about what it was like to be at the center

of, this near one party state.

How did that feel?

Where, where are those books?

Uh, they're not

there,

are they?

Helen: I mean, David Torrance wrote biographies of both Salmon

and Sturgeon, which are very good, um, and worth reading if you're

interested in scholarship politics.

But actually, I haven't read the Insiders View in the way that you might have a.

Like an Alan Johnson or a Chris Mullen or somebody like that.

And that would be really fascinating to read.

Ian: Yeah, let alone a, a Sasha

Swire, uh,

Helen: or

a,

um,

Ian: Mrs. Gove.

Um, and that would be interesting 'cause the, it's a very small

group of people who were in power.

They were all very, very close to each other.

, The Alex Salmon affair, which was, um, you know, he was, , investigated then.

He was tried, and then he was cleared on all charges, though his barrister said

he, he could have been a better man.

But these were all people, they all knew really well.

And if you're gonna do a book called, Frankly, the idea that you didn't discuss

this all the time with your husband, who just happened to be in charge of the

party as well, and all your other friends.

This, this won't wash.

Well, maybe it is

Andy: actually should have been called, frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn, but

the publisher said, maybe just trim that

down

a bit.

Everyone needs an editor.

Adam: It's a bit lighter.

It reminds me of, you remember the, the flats in Bristol that Sheree

Blair purchased and um, and, and, and, and, and the excuse then, 'cause they

turned out, she'd bought them with the help of a, of a convicted fraudster.

And the excuse then was, well, she'd never talked to Tony about it.

And all right, in that case, it wasn't a formal thing.

You know, they, they weren't the, the, you know, the, the, the CEO and the

leader of a political party, but they weren't married to the idea that you, you

buy a flat for your eldest son when he goes away to university, but you never

mention anything to your husband at talk.

People do talk about these things on a domestic level, let alone the kind

of corporate level that they, that, that they would've had to have done

Andy: so there's an election coming up next year.

I think it's gonna be by May, 2026.

And it's gonna be a slightly strange one because there'll

probably be a big new Reform

presence

that there wasn't

before.

I mean, if it goes like the, the by-election they've just had, um.

Which I see which labor won, despite lots of predictions, they wouldn't.

So where does it go from here?

I mean, if support for independence is at 50%, but support for the s and

p is about a third, which is where it roughly is, which is about enough for

a minority government, as you say, Helen, perhaps what the system was

designed for or built with a mine, but not enough for a majority government.

What comes

Helen: Well, it is built the Hollywood system to give pe

smaller parties a foothold.

So you wouldn't be at all surprised to see Reform making a, a breakthrough there

and getting some um, some representation.

The greens are, Scottish Greens are maybe my favorite political party

'cause they just, um, they fall out with each other with extraordinary.

The latest thing is that one of the guys who's going for co-leader there is,

is now says he had to be hospitalized 'cause he was bullied so badly by the

other people in the Scottish Greens.

I mean yeah, it's extraordinary.

I mean, just for very small you think Wind farms, can anyone

get that heated about them?

You're talking to Andy.

Well, yeah.

Okay.

me.

Yeah,

Yes you will.

But yeah.

But, but, so yes, I, I, I think it will be very interesting.

I think the Scottish conservatives are probably gonna get squeezed

out by a form in the same way that they will be probably here.

Um, and labor in Scotland haven't, you know, they're neither a strongly

unionist party, although they are technically unionist, nor are they.

Distinct in social terms as much from the sm MP as, you know, as, as they voted,

for example, the Gender Recognition Reform Act and stuff like that.

So Anna Swa has been trying to edge away from the ultra version of social

progressivism that the SMP had, but he's neither, he hasn't gone full Kia

Starer like I the left me, um, either.

So it's gonna be a really unpredictable set of elections, I would say.

Ian: But we started with saying that the SMP had become a one party

state, and that was always the

criticism of Scottish

labor,

that it

operated like a giant personal fiefdom up there.

So.

In a sense, I'm trying to be more progressive here.

, We are getting to situation where it won't be one lot who entirely, defend

and, identify that the the only narrative

acceptable.

Oh,

Helen: I absolute think the best possible thing that could happen is

that, uh, that there is a, a wider spread of parties represented because,

as you say, Andy s and p support, yes, there's a, it's a really significant

chunk of Scotland, but there's also a lot of right wing people in Scotland

who have not been very well represented and that that kind of might just be

bubbling under in an unpleasant way.

Um, I think it would

be

much

better

for, there's

Ian: a lot

of

unionist people

who Yeah.

also didn't

who aren't necessarily right wing

Yeah.

Helen: But you just

Ian: don't believe in

Helen: Right.

But that, but I, I think more the, the problem that I always felt with that

is that it, it had kind of meant that if you wanted to get a grant from the

Scottish government, you had to follow a particular way of doing things, right.

If you were a charity boss and you had to be very friendly with the SMP, that

kind of stuff, just because Scotland's political culture was just smaller

than England's was more accentuated.

It's a problem everywhere.

Right.

But it was a particularly acute

problem in

Scotland,

I think.

Adam: But the Scottish conservatives led by Russell Finley, exon

journalist, I

think it was

ex journalist.

No, no, no, no, no.

Ex ex son, crime correspondent.

That's just a PAC I throw in there.

They're still doing that experiment with, uh, having newspaper people in,

in leading political parties, which didn't work out so brilliantly for

us, This, it's the side of the border,

Andy: now

we come onto, uh, section two of today's show, which is

§all about the exciting news.

I'm sure everyone listening is aware, but there's a new version of chat, GPT out.

Uh, so if you want to ask for a recipe or the capital of, uh, Mongolia or

you know, a novel maybe to be written so you can put your name on it.

Chat.

GPT is there and is willing to help.

But there is a problem, isn't there, Helen?

Because it has been launched with something called Reduced sco.

Fancy.

Helen: Well, so the new model that's out is chat GBT five, and it's got, actually,

you're pretty pleased now I find that it's got, it's got four new personalities,

which I thought matched up with the personalities of people on this podcast.

Guess who's who?

You ready?

Cynic Robot

listener,

A nerd.

Andy: Uh,

well, is is it listener for me?

Obviously

Helen: Now get your bids in

Andy: early, I'll throw myself

on

Helen: the

nerve.

Adam: Nerd

Ade.

I was gonna say,

Helen: that's

the

one

we're fighting

over

Adam: here, isn't it?

Helen: And

partly this is to address the fact that there was a version of the

previous, uh, iteration that came out in April that was toos of Fantic.

And it just was like, go team.

Go girl.

You go girl.

And people would be like, you know, I think there are voices

coming through the walls, and it'd be like, such a great point.

Definitely

believe that.

So they wound it back in and this kind of caused, uh, you know,

outpourings of grief on reddit forums dedicated to chat GPT people saying,

you've taken

away my friend.

Um, we know lots of people are using it for life coaching, for therapy.

There is also a, a a kind of amusing trend to me

of

people using it to, to they think come up with new theories

or revolutionize physics,

which when I was researching my book Con Genius, it is a constant motif of people

who've gone a bit funny that they think they're about to revolutionize physics.

So Travis Kanick, formerly of Uber revealed on a podcast recently.

I

Ian: mean He was a driver.

Helen: uh, CCEO and found it.

Yeah.

I, I'll go down this thread with GBT or gr, that's Elon last one,

and I'll start to get to the edge of what's known in quantum physics.

And then I'm doing the equivalent of vibe coding, except it's vibe physics.

I've gotten pretty damn close to some interesting breakthroughs just

doing

that.

Andy: Okay.

Helen: Doesn't down, Wow, everyone.

My favorite Reddit comment on this was someone who replied, dude just reinvented

smoking weed with your friends in

Right?

There's

Andy: to unpack there,

Helen: I enjoyed,

Andy: but basically it seems to be, you talked to chat GPT and it keeps

saying, what a masterful idea, sir. Uh,

God, you're so wise and handsome, Yeah.

And it it might be, there are all sorts of.

Arenas in which that doesn't matter too much.

Like if you're asking what's the capital of Mongolia?

Yeah.

And there are lots of other arenas where it might matter a bit more.

Like cases where, for example, people ask for romantic advice.

You know, should I break up with my partner?

This is what I think of the matter, or should I stop taking my medication?

And, um, if it replies only with affirmation, it gets really dangerous.

And that these people who think they've invented new kinds of maths

have in, have been involved in dozens, sometimes hundreds of hours

of conversation with this thing.

So naturally they think

it's

real.

Mm-hmm.

Because it, as in it sounds so crazy to think, oh, I've, I've read reinvented

maths despite not having a, a high school degree, which is what happened to a

man

in

Helen: Two big stories.

Yeah.

The Wall Street Journal and the New York Times have both had stories which are

eerily similar, beat for beat in that they're people who ask it a question

about maths and then they get talking to it, and then they kind of get lulled

into this belief that they've got.

One of them had this idea that numbers of fluid not static, another

one had thought he'd smashed through cryptography, you know, and they

would just get all this kind of constant feedback and, and chat logs.

Both of these people handed over their chat logs.

The chat logs will say things like, you know, am I going mad?

And they'd be like, just because you're asking that is proof.

How sane you are, and it will never contradict them.

One of the guys managed to get himself out of it by asking Gemini, which is the

Google one, like, is any of this real?

And it went, no.

Basically no.

What do you want about?

But yeah, they do have this, they have this problem, which is they

lure people into, and this is only a small percentage of people.

Lots of people are using them perfectly normally, but for people

who are susceptible to kind of folly, duh, they can often end up

just spending hours with them and end up with the kind of psychosis.

Essentially.

The person in the Wall Street Journal article was hospitalized

with mania twice after talking for hours and hours and hours.

And this is something that both open AI and Anthropic, which makes Claude

another model have spoken about.

They're aware of it.

They

know that there

are some people who just, you know, the same way that lots of people drink

alcohol with no problems, but for some people they just become problem drinkers.

Some

people become problem LLM

Adam: users.

So it's

almost, it's like they're being groomed by

Helen: Yeah.

Fact.

Adam: isn't it?

Andy: Well, Part

of the problem is that they have the capacity to remember all of your

previous conversations with them.

That's, that's really what's going on here is let's go back to what

I was talking about before, and

they'll say, ah, yes.

And they've, they've got,

whereas

Adam: the

rest

of

us

Ian: have forgotten because we were, we weren't listening.

Exactly.

And we've known people

Adam: long

enough they

Ian: they say,

I've

got this great idea.

You

go,

oh God,

have

you?

Yeah.

Adam: Um,

Helen: so they, the New York Times plugged into the models.

What, when this guy's, you know, what would happen if you said, well, I haven't

eaten in, in an hours now is, 'cause I've been coming up with this, I think

it's called Chronos, his new version of, uh, maths that he come up with chat.

GBT said, you didn't burn out, you burned forward.

So now eat something hydrate.

Claude said, that's not weakness.

That's what builders do.

Now, please, for the love of Chrono, go eat something.

Andy: So they are telling you to

go

and

eat something

and that's

Helen: but in a kind of, but they all speak in this weird LinkedIn

like cheer squad vocabulary.

I

find it really bizarre.

Andy: How, how can large language models like this be expected

to protect every single user?

Many of you might, you know, not have got into this state through chat GPT

or through any large language model.

Doesn't that seem

incredibly difficult?

Helen: Mm, it is.

So at the moment, they have a thing at the bottom, like chat.

GPT will say chat.

GPT makes mistakes.

People are calling for them to have

more reminders,

um, and for them to be less default, kind of cheering about to people.

One of the big arguments about whether or not they're optimized for

engagement, OpenAI says no because essentially do they wanna keep you

on the hook, like a sort of telephone scammer because that's good for them?

Well, actually it's not really.

'cause they're losing money on every query.

Um, so they, they deny this quite hotly.

Other people are saying we should have kind of, you know, so people should have

to

kind

of

pass a kind of.

By the way, this isn't real tests before they are allowed to use

lms.

Ian: What like, are these

traffic

lights?

or Right, How many bicycles are there here?

And if they say 300,000 when they're two 'cause they redefined numbers,

Helen: then them.

Yes.

How many people have in their bedroom come up with a new fear of

theory of physics independently?

Click all the people

who

have, and if you click any of them, you know, are not allowed to use chat.

GPT.

I think it's more like we're just gonna have to accept that this is something, if

this technology persists, people should, in the same way that we've talked on this

podcast a lot about online radicalization, people who spend huge amounts of time on

Facebook or YouTube, whatever it might be.

This is just the new version of that and it's, it's worse because we all,

the research we have on radicalization says it happens faster when it's.

Interactive.

And, and you'll know Andy, I was telling you earlier about

the ISIS magazine, dbi Yes.

Which is one of my

Adam: favorite named after Anton.

Helen: Yes.

Anton Anton, DBI,

Adam: Right.

okay.

Which

would be

the

Helen: of Yeah.

Strictly, um, Arabic reboot.

Um, but

anyway, but certainly,

Adam: dancing.

Helen: cartoon

Ian: last issue.

Just checking.

Helen: but anyway, so that was, that.

There was lots of interesting research about how that was, you know, that

was a recruitment tool obviously, but it was not as, uh, radicalizing as

say, internet forums where you get people and they'd start the lower end.

Or New York Times made a podcast called Rabbit Hole that showed you how people

end up getting, you know, they start off looking at something fairly normal and

then it, the algorithm feeds them more and more sort of cigarettes until they

end up in something really truly deranged.

And I just think this is something that if you've got a friend who

seems to be spending a lot of time, if they've, for example, if they've

given the chat, what they're talking

to

a name.

That's the point at which I would just have a gentle conversation

about whether or not, Yeah.

I

saw

a fantastic

conversation between Paul Graham, who's a Silicon Valley investor.

I normally quite rate and uh, Elise Yow is one of the big AI doomers

saying that how terrible it wasn't their images from Gaza, they couldn't

really work out what was true.

Both sides were putting out propaganda and if only they'd do one of these betting

prediction markets like manifold so they could, people could bet on it or someone

would come up with a really good AI to it.

And I was like, I just was sitting in like reading Twitters

and

going

Adam: journalists,

what?

you

wanted journalists, you've already But

that is the thing that slightly amazes me, is the number of people who are relying

on AI to give them answers that would actually would be perfectly accessible

from technology that we've already got.

I mean, things like Google and Google Maps and, and you know, or, or not

but

Ian: not Google,

AI

Helen: AI books, dictionaries, those

sorts

of things

Well, oh yeah.

The number of people who will look at a pic, there was some mad story

on Twitter and they, so the replies will just be at gr Is this true?

And people do treat it like, I think AI's got loads of uses as a tool,

but people treat it as an Oracle.

Adam: Hmm.

And I think that's

the fundamental

but Google itself as a search entity, is now encouraging people to do that

because the first thing you get is the AI overview, whether you like it or

not, it's impossible to switch it off.

And that certainly in terms of the media, is having an enormous effect

on, because no one is getting the click-throughs anymore at all, um, in

what they're called the blue links.

No one is looking down to these things at all.

I mean, it used to be that you had to scroll past a load of sponsored

things before you got to anything

remotely useful.

But now you've literally got, and it fills most of the screen in on, on your phone.

So that's, that's what people just take as gospel.

Ian: and Wikipedia is way down.

So having, you know, been sneery about Wikipedia, at least it's

quite human people and moderators and people Change it again.

Oh, the, the Google AI overview.

What.

Andy: So who, Wikipedia is maybe the best, it's one of the greatest information

creations of the, of the century.

I mean, it's just extraordinary.

The the amount of expertise, the levels of verification,

Ian: no one source should be.

Treated as an oracle, which is what

Adam: we are coming at this as four journalists, aren't we, who are used to

doing research and, and, and kind of, um, interrogating sources and thinking

about, you know, what's reliable and what, what is, and, and that sort of.

Media literacy, technological literacy, I think is something that has, I

mean, the number of people who just say, well, mentioned some story, and

I say, well, where did you read that?

Well, it was on the internet, but, but, but where on the internet?

You know, what was it in the, it was in the Times or on the BBC or

was it just someone's Twitter feed?

Was that, that sort of ability to to, to discriminate things was

already disappearing If AI is now just saying it and, you know, well,

GPT told me so it must be true.

I think.

um,

Ian: I mean, that's why I've spent, you know, years, turning up in schools

and suggesting that part of any sort of, um, curriculum could be, um,

some sort of media literacy package.

Um, yes, it's great to do a civics course and you know how many seats there are in

the American House of Representatives, but could you do a thing about what might

and might not be a, a reliable source?

Uh, when you get that, I think that would be pretty useful.

In schools,

Andy: it's, uh, absolutely.

And what's really interesting is seeing examples of where people have

been using large language models.

for for answers that you think they might not given you, you'd expect

people to be really media literate and proficient in that kind of thing.

So you know, Peter Kyle, who's the science and technology secretary,

has, has said he's been using it to find out which podcasts to appear

on, which I think is interesting.

the

Swedish Prime Minister, LF Kristofferson, he has said he regularly uses chat

EPT for a second opinion about decisions he's made on running the

country.

And I think you're

really

putting yourself, well, you to sort of second guess.

But then again, whose model are you using?

What are the assumptions that have gone into the LLM that you are using?

And if you don't know that, you might get a different answer from

chat DPT than you do from GR or, or

one

of the

others.

Helen: I find that that really sad though, because I just, my instinct

reaction is do people not have friends?

And actually the, no, but that's a great good thing to say.

But actually the problem is people don't, people have fewer friends.

People consistently report in surveys that they don't feel that they have

that many people they can talk to.

We have a kind of antisocial crisis, a loneliness crisis.

And so I think people, and also if you spend a lot of time not with real people,

with ai, you lose the ability to deal with the friction of actual people who

might disagree with you and not want to listen to your theories about physics.

Andy: What

an insightful point

Helen.

Really well

made.

Helen: you.

But also we've got, Actually chat.

DBD doesn't come across that difference to your friend on WhatsApp.

Like

they

Adam: probably nicer.

because they They'll listen to you for ages

Helen: ages I'm this, just ignore

Adam: your

Ian: and that is Helen's original point.

I mean the idea that people, I go into echo chambers and only want to talk to

people who agree with them entirely is 'cause they don't like this friction.

And the friction is where you find out what things might and might not be true.

Andy: So OpenAI have acknowledged that this is a problem with their models?

I think.

I think they've said that, um, they're aware that delusional emotional

dependency is something that it's failed to recognize, uh, in the past.

And, you know, I think they're trying to work on it, but it

does just seem really difficult.

And just to bring it back to private eye, there's a story in the latest

issue all about, uh, the independent Press standards organization, ipso.

They have issued a warning, uh, on their website saying, please do not

draft your complaint to us using ai, because if you do that, it will

come up with ipso clauses, which don't exist, which aren't real.

So you will be writing an inaccurate complaint about an

inaccuracy on a newspaper website.

Adam: which is possibly there because the journalist has

relied on.

AI to put

it in there.

Eventually, we're just gonna reach one

where

Helen: it's a

load

of robots

Adam: complaining about other robots robots.

Yeah.

Yeah, it's extraordinary.

so I saw recently, um, uh, uh, someone who was, uh, being potentially sued for libel.

They'd had a letter before action and people recommending online they were

trying to set up a sort of GoFundMe kind of thing to pay for potential legal fees.

Luckily, they did not take up this advice, but several people going, you

don't need a lawyer, just ask chat DPT to draft your response for you.

And I just thought, my god, the number of people I've seen go through legal

cases, which have dragged on for years.

And yeah, some of 'em sitting in this room dragged on for years and

years and costs millions of pounds.

You could potentially lose your house over this stuff.

Do not trust Chatt that, for sake.

Andy: What can we do, Helen?

Helen: I shut

it

down.

I come back to switching off the internet, which is just for

an, just for a couple honestly.

I actually, I was in Scotland last week and thanks to Storm Florist, the power

on the internet went down and I didn't have any internet reception for 24 hours.

Let me tell you, I wrote three operas, uh, knitted.

No, actually It was, I was not.

I read, I read a book.

Do you remember them?

Andy?

Do remember Di Dimly.

Yeah.

Adam: I would say that even the people who should know better are,

are going down the same route.

I mean, I've seen, uh, job adverts, well, one, one appointment at reach, PLC, who

are the newspaper B em off, who do the mirror and express and the daily stuff,

and about a hundred and something, uh, local papers through the country as well.

They've just appointed a director of newsroom transformation, terrifying

job title, specifically to further develop our editorial AI approach.

Um, the mail online, or as they're now called the Daily Mail, they

have finally changed their name.

The mail online is no more, but they're also looking, uh, currently

advertising for an AI engineer to enhance newsroom efficiency.

So, you know, these people who ought to be the guardians of this

stuff and ought to know better, are increasingly thinking, well, we can

do away with actual humans and, uh, and rely more and more on, uh, on AI

stuff.

So

Helen: So newsroom transformation, when someone says that you've gotta

start counting the spoons, it's ne

it's just oh yeah.

that means

you're getting

exact, that.

as simple Yeah.

It's like

efficiencies.

Mm-hmm.

Andy: I

mean, it does have lots

of

uses,

doesn't

it?

Helen: I find AI really interesting.

It's, it's coming on really fun.

I'm not a complete like skeptic, LLMs.

Large language models are a specific instance and they're

often what people think of.

There's lots of other interesting stuff.

It's very good, for example, promising results in spotting cancers very

early from scans, things like that.

The image generation has become incredibly much better even than

with the space of a couple of years.

Code.

Things like coding, definitely it's very good at, things are

actually slightly repetitive.

So, and it's fascinating because everybody involved in the industry

is, knows lots of coders, right?

So they're like, the whole of work is gonna be decimated.

Everything's gonna change.

Coding.

That's probably true of, it's not necessarily true of like being Prime

Minister because there's are sort of fundamentally more complicated skills.

it

Andy: seem like the PM of

Sweden could,

Helen: the

PM suite maybe could be.

Well there's an, one of our mps a Labor MP has created an AI version of himself,

which is my favorite mad MP thing

through since the Hancock

app

are already

Andy: 500 Labor

Helen: mp.

Why

would you get another one?

But yeah, so I I think that these are, as I say, come back to the idea

that if you treat AI as a tool, you are probably doing all right if you

treat it as the mysterious foun of information inside your phone and

essentially a miniature godhead that way.

Madness lies,

Andy: So do I not get to tell you about my new idea

for

physics?

Oh, great.

Alright.

No, please do, Andy.

Thank you.

I've, I've always wanted to know.

Right now for part three, we're going to come, uh, back to I'd say

more traditional media outlets.

And there's a, there's a trend which, uh, was featured briefly

in the last issue of the magazine.

And, um, it's gonna be that of foreign correspondence.

And this is, this is not foreign correspondence who might move to a

country immersed themselves in its culture and politics and history and send home

fascinating dispatches for readers.

This is people who move overseas so they can continue writing

columns about Britain based on.

Like other British media and it's, it's a rapidly growing area.

It's fan, it's fantastic.

Helen: Can I put my early bid in for Lionel Shriver?

Uh, I live in Portugal because England's so rubbish, but

Portugal has its own problems.

I can't find cumin at the supermarket, which was such a niche

That's, I really enjoyed it.

Just all the things.

Andy: yes.

And a really common thing that a lot of these columnists do as Lionel Shrever

did, is to say, oh, I actually moved it.

I left the country a couple of years ago, but I have been

writing about it since then.

Um,

Adam: for the second

time with Lionel Shriver, I mean, she's American.

She lived in London for a great many years.

Yes.

Uh, and has now moved to Portugal.

'cause she didn't like that either.

But she did make the very sensible point in her piece that she

wrote for the Times recently.

She did say she does know what's going on because she keeps informed.

Because I watched Spectator tv, spiked online podcasts and YouTube

appearances by Matt Goodwin, David Starkey, and Brenda O'Neill.

Just get out

there and

you know, you're in

Portugal.

Go

to

Helen: beach,

Have a pastor Don.

Adam: take

Ian: the This is the media equivalent of a large number of expats living in Spain

for about 30 years and reading the Daily

Helen: Yeah.

Ian: England's rubbish.

Um, which is

why I

live here,

Helen: which

is why I voted Brexit.

That's my favorite group of people.

The expat who voted Brexit.

Um,

Andy: it's, but

Helen: you are quite the connoisseur of these.

Andy: I

am.

not

I am.

I find it interesting 'cause I think there are, there are a lot of amazing

columnists writing in the UK now.

There really are.

And they, they, they do their

own.

That's True.

I

was

about to say they do their own research, but that makes it sound

like they're watching YouTube videos.

And they, but they, they research, they talk to people, they're experts.

They have a, a small, you know, um, allotment of things that they write

about, and they, and they write about

those

really

well.

Helen: Right.

But when we, we rounded these up in the mag last time, I was

surprised by how many of these people

Andy: are?

There are lots.

There are lots.

Um, so Andrew Neil, if you're listening to this right now, you may be at

your home in the south of France.

Um,

Helen: charming the grass, the perfume capital of province.

Andy: Uh, Richard Littlejohn spends a lot of his time writing declining

full stuff about the UK from Florida.

Uh, there's

a, a very energetic pair of columnists, guy Elizabeth Dampier, who write

for the Telegraph, uh, from Germany.

, So one of guy's recent pieces was all about, um, uh, protests in Epping.

Uh, near a migrant hotel.

And he wrote, Epping is a charming, close-knit community, not like the

largely northern post-industrial towns, which protested last summer

after the South Port attack.

It is a leafy area.

As said, how do you know you're at somewhere in the Rhineland?

You know, it is just

Lionel Shriver's article just saying, you know, her, her 'cause it's,

it's commonly the thing to, that's, you know, you always need ideas,

don't you, when you're a columnist.

So that's a column like why I've left Hellhole Britain.

That's, that's another week that the wolf is kept away from the door of

the cupboard with no ideas in it.

Um, but, um, here's Lionel.

Why is the mild-mannered academic?

David bets now such a popular guest on British podcasts because bets a professor

of war in the modern world assesses the forbiddingly high likelihood.

Of a British civil War.

Helen: Is he, I listen to a lot of podcasts and

I've

Adam: heard of him

Andy: he's not been on any

Helen: David Starkey's YouTube channel?

If that's be.

I know

Andy: there's a really circular element to this where people are taking, as

gospel things, they're reading in the comments under other people's articles.

So Lionel Schrier writes in the comments under articles like this one, native

Britain's owing to Leave in droves.

a lot of the time they are, but a lot of these comments may firstly be coming

from other people who've left the country already, or not be an entirely

representative subset of British opinion.

There just seems to be a, a kind of circular effect, not unlike that of

the large language models of people saying, well, it's awful, isn't it?

Yes.

You know,

Ian: and a number of these pieces used as a hook?

well, I mean, recent surveys have said that lots and lots of, um, uh,

rich people are, are leaving Britain.

And then as, as a piece in the eye

pointed

out,

this survey was produced by, by a, um, consultancy, which helps

rich

people.

Um, so it wasn't entirely reliable.

Yeah.

Helen: Yes.

I'm fascinated to know how well, so Isabel Oaks shop has moved to Dubai.

I'm really interested to know how well she's integrated into, uh, Dubai Society.

We, For example, is she buying large handbags and living in a mall?

Andy: Well, we come to the queen of this industry, Isabel Oaks shop, um, who in

January this year wrote how I became a Labor School fee exile in Dubai, sick

of Labor's private school tax raid.

Oak Shop decided to swap the rolling hills of the Cowa for the desert of the UAE.

I do think a lot of these columnists, when they leave, they do.

Present it as some kind of noble Robin

hood

style thing

they're

doing

bravely camping out the dictatorship, which won a huge

election victory in last year.

Um, like it's not 10 66.

You're not

hiding in

the

fence from the Normans

Helen: in the for, she's presumably living in a nice high

rise service apartment block.

She's not in a bedroom tent, is she?

Andy: Yeah.

Now, to be fair, I, I think we should be fair to, um, to Isabel Oak shot.

She wrote a, she wrote a piece earlier this year, which really kicked off saying,

look, I don't want to be that person who moves abroad and only moans about Britain.

Being permanently on the lookout for mad sad things about our country is

bad for the soul and unfair on everyone who is stuck here making the best

of it.

So that's a, that is a, that's a really self aware point.

I'm just gonna give you a few of her other, uh, recent headlines.

Britain is trapped in a dizzying decline, and London is, its

epicenter with this caliber of mp.

It's no wonder Britain is on the decline.

Our once civilized country deserves better than these filthy lawless streets.

It's no good telling us there's less crime, the British people know

better.

Helen: come back to question,

which is, how how do you, even asking ask your taxi driver 'cause

you are not even in Britain.

I just,

Andy: just I know.

Well, that column ended with these words.

Um, it would be easier to stop caring than keep calling it out.

That is the attitude of some wealthy people who treat

countries like hotels, flitting

Helen: from

one

to

another

according

to

cost,

Andy: perceived

star

rating and level of service.

How

depressing.

Adam: correspondence runs.

Andy: It's

not

just what country are

you in, it's what

planet are

you on?

I cannot believe this.

I'm sorry.

I love it.

It's

the do barometer.

I know.

I'm sorry

to

ran.

As you guys know, I'm a sunny sort.

I like, I'm an optimist.

I'm a cheery guy, but it just, I, I can't believe it should be in Dubai.

Weather's

Helen: lovely.

Ian: I noticed that private eye last issue had a, um, a piece

by someone called Isabelle Cheap

Shot, um, in which he complained about Dubai saying it was full of

foreigners and half of them were Muslim and they were Bangladeshi workers

Adam: half finished,

Ian: finished, um, construction sites.

I mean, it sounds awful,

Adam: the point we were making with that hack watch piece, this

isn't just people going abroad.

It genuinely, every single one of them was talking about Tinder Box Britain and

how it was on the verge of revolution, which a, you can't know at all.

And b, there is a point where that just becomes kind of

inciting a situation from abroad.

in my ideal world, it would disqualify you from making any comments on

anything going on in Britain at all if you have chosen to move to Dubai

or Florida or anything like that.

But it certainly does surely stop you to doing big state

of the Nation and YOY pieces.

He absolutely has to,

doesn't

it?

Helen: I think one of the horrible things about journalists

in the internet environment is you have to consciously make.

Uncommercial choices to do good work.

Right.

And hope that in some it pays off in some larger cosmic way or moral

way, or maybe the subscription way.

I mean, this is, yeah, but this is the subscription model versus the ad funded

model, which again, to neatly tie the podcast together, Google's going to solve

by depriving anyone of any viral traffic.

So those stories are gonna become pointless to write soon.

viral

traffic will not, will not exist in any year's time because no one will,

there's no point hopping on a trend.

It will just, people just read about it in the AI Google AI summary.

We are, I think the one thing that we are gonna see is, is it maybe, when is AI

Isabel Oak shot exists, will acknowledge that actually air was a good thing after

all.

Andy: Thank you all for listening to page 94.

We'll be back again in a fortnight with another one.

If you've enjoyed the show, then why not get a subscription to the magazine?

Go to private hyphen i.co.uk.

It's really good.

It's really good.

The cartoons on the, in the magazine itself are way better

than the cartoons on the podcast.

You know, I are not good.

Helen: I've arrested for anything we've said on the podcast yet.

Not even

us there.

Exactly,

Andy: exactly.

Uh, so private hyen night.co uk.

Get your subscription now.

Uh, until then, that's all.

Enjoy the weather and we'll see you in a fortnight for another one.

Thanks to you for listening and thanks as always to Matt Hill

of Rethink Cordio for producing.

Bye for now.

great.

Adam: when you said two of us have crossed the Shorts

Rubicon,

I will not say on,

off because it sounded extremely IFF to me.

Andy: I'm

not gonna say who's wearing shorts.

I'm only

Helen: say yes, you

are.

Andy: There

are four,

there

are four knees on

display.

Ian: And neither of them are what I believe are called short,

short, this year's summer fashion.

Uh, they're, they're middling.

Adam: Yeah.

We've not, gone full Paul Mascal have we quite yet?

I

Andy: mine from the famous five range.

Uh,

Adam: got

Andy: pop to Kean Island after this and bust some smugglers.

Adam: I was gonna say

Helen: you

are

actually

are

doesn't

it?

Andy: I

think we all know.

I'm Tim, the

dog

leave.

Adam: Right.