Is there bullying in the ocean?
Yes.
Do you ever see animals just messing with other animals
and hurting other animals just for the sake of hurting them?
Yes.
Yes.
Oh, Brenda, no.
I'm Mick Ebeling, founder and CEO of Not Impossible Labs.
For the past 15 years, we've been on a mission
to change the world through technology and story
by addressing societal problems
to improve the lives of everyone.
With a crew of engineers, hackers, entrepreneurs,
technologists, storytellers, and artists,
we've tackled and solved
some of the world's most incredible challenges.
But here's the thing,
we're just a small team in Venice Beach.
The world is full of people making the impossible possible.
My goal now with this podcast is to find these people,
share their stories, and hopefully, together,
we can keep pushing the limits of what's possible.
On today's episode, we talk to the SETI team
who's figured out a way to communicate with whales
in hopes of learning how to one day talk to aliens.
If whales have sentences,
then maybe we can finish a sentence.
If we're not detecting things out in space,
then we can't even understand
what animals in our own oceans are saying.
Is there a perceptual gap?
We do know that animals eavesdrop on each other.
Animal eavesdropping,
that's gonna be a whole new podcast episode for us.
What's that?
I would like to welcome everybody to the podcast.
I am joined with,
I'm gonna have each of you
just give a quick introduction to yourself,
just your name, rank, serial number,
mother's maiden name, social security, the usual stuff
so that the public will be able to
do any type of identity theft
that is just typical in things like this.
But we can go through that
and then we'll get into the conversation.
So we'll start, I'll just call it out.
Lisa, let's start with you
because in my Brady Bunch squares, I see you at the top.
Hi, my name is Lisa Walker.
I am a whale song theorist.
I take my background in music and composition
and apply it to understanding the vocalizations
of the humpback whale.
Fred.
Yeah, my primary interest is in behavioral ecology
and working with the humpbacks in the field
to answer both curiosity-driven questions
about their social structure and meaning of their acoustics
as well as conservation-based initiatives.
Jodi.
Yes, I am a marine photographer
and I have been studying
and observing humpback whale behavior
for about 24 years now,
both on the breeding grounds and the feeding grounds.
And prior to that was trained animals
and worked with animal behavior.
So I'm interested in the whole ball of wax.
Josephine.
So I am a animal behaviorist
and postdoctoral scholar at UC Davis,
really interested in animal behavioral flexibility
and cognition.
And Brenda.
Hi, I'm Brenda McCowan.
I'm a professor of animal behavior
at the University of California, Davis
and the California National Primate Research Center.
And my area of expertise is in biobehavioral complexity
and specifically looking at animal communication
and social dynamics in a number of different species,
including humpback whales.
Incredible.
Why is it important to understand what animals,
just we'll talk macro,
what animals are communicating?
Why is that important?
Well, we share the world with these beings
and they're remarkable in their own right.
They're also parts of natural integrated ecological systems
that sustain us and sustain the planet.
And so making sure that their wellbeing
is addressed as much as our own
will I think assist with long-term planet survivability.
I also see other non-human animals as being our comrades
and that by understanding them better,
we will better understand ourselves.
On August 18th, a group of nine whales
and correct me if I'm wrong,
tell me if I've got this correct,
but on, oh, all right.
Jody is even putting a hand up right now.
I didn't even get past the date.
Well, I'm only saying-
This is the correct me if you're wrong section
and I didn't even get correct me if I,
I didn't even finish that before she slapped me down.
This is because I, well, I tried to be quiet about it.
I did my homework.
I went back and I looked at my fluke photos
and an assessment or identification of the whales
that was done by somebody else who was on the voyage.
And we identified five different whales.
We told you nine, that's on us, not on you.
Okay, all right, no problem.
I thought you were gonna say,
hey, they weren't whales actually.
It was impersonators.
James Cameron was shooting an underwater avatar
and I was like, oh, the whole thing's blown.
All right, so on August 18th, 2021,
you recorded a questionable number of whales
that have yet to be proved,
but Jody says it's five whales,
one of whom was named Twain.
And on August 19th, you played back a recording
of what's called a whoop call.
A whoop call is a low frequency sound
humpback whales use to stay in touch.
It's how they contact each other across distances.
That you had recorded the day before
through hydrophones that you dropped into the water.
That was about three miles
from where the original recording was.
And one Twain, one whale,
then approached the boat and responded to the whoop call.
And you replayed that now,
I think it was 33 times over a period of 20 minutes
and Twain responded every single time.
So is this, let's just start,
because it's called not impossible.
Transition from impossible to not impossible.
Was this the first time that this had happened
where there was some type of call and response action
that we had had with humpback whales?
Yes.
There have been a variety of other types of playbacks
done to both humpback whales and other bathing whales.
Oftentimes playback studies will just use
a static predetermined set of what we call exemplars
or outgoing sounds.
Those sounds are not varied depending on the information
that is coming back from the animal.
A static approach is basically playing prerecorded sounds.
The real breakthrough, a dynamic approach.
They adjusted the sounds in real time
and Twain in response adjusted her replies.
It's amazing that with just three computers,
one to record, one to tweak sounds,
and one for playback,
we can create real whale interactions.
And so being able to engage these animals
in this extended interaction bodes well for the future
because it means the animals can using an acoustic modality
sort of get interested in the human signals
and be present with you for this 20 minute period.
So you recorded a whale saying something
and then you played it back.
How do we not know that someone wasn't saying like,
hey, you got a little krill on your cheek
and you might need to wipe it off
or some other thing that was being said?
Well, because the whoops are often recorded
when the animals are dispersed over a wide area,
we believe often by singletons.
So it suggests it's one of these calls
that's out of context,
that there's some distance between the animals.
So again, that suggested it sort of operates
like a contact call.
So we were just sort of expecting with the playback
is to get animals returning back their vocalization
every so often.
We weren't necessarily expecting
to have a more extended interaction.
I just want to add one thing is that
when you record something
and then make it into a picture, like a spectrogram,
you can see that the whoop call is very clearly defined.
It has this low growl component and then an upsweep.
So it can shift in frequency,
but when you see it on the spectrogram,
you can identify it as the whoop call.
And many, many contact calls are structured that way
in terms of spanning a number of frequencies,
it makes it highly localizable.
So the animals know where each other are.
So we're not entirely sure exactly
what the function of that call is,
but there's a lot of consensus as Fred has just said
that it's probably some type of contact call.
It seems like it's a giant game of animal Marco Polo, right?
They're yelling out Marco, someone else says Polo,
oh, Bruce is over there, Twain's over there,
Shania is behind me, da-da-da-da,
we got that, we have a way to sonar,
I'm not going to say sonar, but to,
with an audio function,
we're able to identify where people are.
Right, it provides a map, right?
It provides a map of where individuals are.
We think there's individual variation,
Fred, you can speak to this more than I can,
but I think it's starting to be shown
that there's individual variation in these calls as well
that could be used to identify particular individuals.
So yeah, it's kind of,
I mean, I've actually used that analogy before.
It's a little bit like a Marco Polo thing that went on.
It just said it was done within a hundred meters of our boat
with an animal circling our boat, which was very unusual.
And with the animal being present the day before
when we recorded the exemplar
and then showing up several miles
from the location we had recorded it the day before
and coming over to our boat as we played it back to her.
And it may be that either it was herself
that produced that call
or it was a group member in that group that day
because it was recorded from that group that she was in.
And just like anybody who is familiar
with a friend's voice,
it may be that she was responding
because it was something that she was familiar with.
So-
Or Brenda, everyone hates the sound
of their own voice on their voicemail
or she was just really pissed off
that you guys were playing her voice
over and over and over again.
But if she was pissed off,
then why at the end of the experiment
with under our permit requirements,
we had to stop issuing the exemplar,
she kept on vocalizing.
She kept talking.
She, for three more vocalizations,
as she swam off, she was whooping back to us.
I think that we saw that.
That is so special that she was doing that.
So I'm gonna say that you wasn't,
you didn't piss her off
that you would use your own voice.
I'm gonna say just because of that,
it was one of her friends.
And maybe one of her friends
was saying something nice about her too.
So, you know, we'll never know.
You are part of,
I don't know if I describe it as a team
or it's part of a thinking called SETI.
SETI stands for Search
for Extraterrestrial Intelligence.
So somehow along the way,
this conversation has gone from,
wait, we're not just communicating to whales,
but this is part of a higher purpose
about extraterrestrial intelligence.
Say more about SETI,
say more about the purpose of SETI
and say more about
if you could just teach us the secret handshake
so that at least we could know that
before we get off the call.
Yeah, it's pretty exciting
and if that's actually how this team initially formed,
realizing that if like,
if we're not detecting things out in space,
but yet we can't even understand
what animals in our own oceans are saying,
I mean, is there perceptual gaps
in our ability to detect extraterrestrial life?
And we can be awash in electromagnetic signals
that contain information about life-bearing sender,
but we're just not cued into it yet.
Whoa, hold up.
Fred just threw out a wild theory.
Basically, the search for intelligent life
beyond our planet might actually start right here on Earth.
What if aliens have been trying to talk to us for years,
but we just don't have the tech
or understanding to recognize it?
I mean, we can't even figure out
how most animals on our planet communicate,
so what makes us think
that we'd understand extraterrestrials?
Take whales, for example.
They talk to each other across miles of ocean.
Kinda sounds like something an alien would do, right?
And as we look to Earth
and see all this amazing diversity of intelligence
and the diversity of communication
and the diversity of ecological niches
that animals are exploiting,
I would say that there almost statistically
has to be life out there somewhere.
It just seems that the mathematics are in favor
of us potentially discovering
some sort of alien civilization.
And so the lessons that we can draw from,
like, let's say, listening to humpback acoustics,
how do they propagate sound over long distances?
And one thing that they do
is they have very large silences
between their vocalizations and, let's say, their song.
How can we use that as a template
to potentially construct a communication system
with these extraterrestrials that one day we hope to meet?
Do you think that we have the opportunity
in the delving into understanding to learn from them,
not just to be curious about what they're saying,
but to actually get insights
into things that we're trying to discover?
We have discovered a lot in the last 50 or 60 years
about how complex these animals are.
We didn't think animals had culture
until the 1970s and 80s.
They do.
We are seeing complex communication systems.
Greta, what do you mean by culture?
When you say we didn't know they had culture,
what do you mean?
Variation in behavioral patterns
across different populations,
something that Josie's interested in,
like, for example, the behavioral flexibility
of changing the way you do things
based upon your environment
and who you're interacting with.
So that's what I mean by culture.
It actually fits the definition,
but we've spent a lot of time
separating humans from other animals,
and yet we find that there are a lot of similarities,
even if we're evolutionary divergent.
And I think what's important to add there
is that, of course, we can,
to bring that community together
to try to understand what parallels there might be
across animals is super valuable,
but also each animal evolves in a different environment,
and of course their abilities and communication systems
are adapted for those environments.
So we have to keep in mind
both their similarities and differences
when we're trying to make strides in animal communication.
Have you seen or studied the ability for animals,
different types of animals
being able to communicate with each other?
That's a good question.
I haven't studied that particularly.
My focus has been on how the definition of flexibility,
behavioral flexibility,
being able to adjust your behavior
to match your environment.
So a lot of my doctoral thesis work
focused on how urban animals,
primates in particular, non-human primates,
can adjust to coexist with people
and how it affects their natural behavior.
What I will say is that we do know
that animals eavesdrop on each other
and they gain information from others
that can be beneficial.
So that's a whole section of research
that we can talk about.
You gotta say more about that.
Animal eavesdropping.
That's gonna be a whole new podcast episode for us.
What's that?
Yeah, it's really cool.
The idea that, for example,
if there is a threat in the environment
and one bird sends off an alarm call,
like what Brenda was talking about earlier,
other birds can hear that alarm call
and know that if they have a similar shared threat
that they should be-
I'd like to jump in with a couple of examples.
Brenda had mentioned alarm calls
and Josie just talked about that.
And that's, to me,
been one of the more fascinating studies
I haven't observed it personally,
but Con Slobodchikoff studied this
and found that they had specific calls,
i.e. like a noun for each potential predator.
So a hawk would have one call,
a wolf would have another call,
a dog would have a different one,
a human might have one.
And then as they began to parse this out
without the help of AI,
they found that they had identifiers
for the speed at which the predator was moving
or the color of the predator.
So it appears that they included adjectives
and adverbs in their communications.
As we wrap it up,
what are your hopes and dreams
in terms of what you see in the near
and maybe not so near future
in terms of how this,
your ability to communicate with whales progresses?
So I think what we learned from this experiment,
because I mean, we all know it was an N of one,
a single example of this kind of dynamic exchange
in a very simplistic way,
because all we could change
was the timing of the playback
and see how she responded by matching temporally to that,
is to actually develop a system
where we can more adaptively and dynamically
change what we're playing back in real time.
So that maybe if whales have sentences,
again in quotes, just like conversing,
then maybe we can finish a sentence
by understanding the patterns
of their own communication system
and then using that in this dynamic adaptive playback way.
I think that's what we hope to do in the future.
Obviously with care,
we wanna make sure that we're not doing anything harmful
to the whales or any other species for that matter
in these kinds of playback experiments.
I just wanted to say, thank you.
We are huge, huge admirers of your work.
I hope that at some point we get a chance
to go on one of your voyages so we can witness this ourself.
And when and if, not if,
when you have more progress in this space,
we would hope that you would reach out.
We really, really wanna understand
if they are saying things like,
yeah, do you want krill or shrimp for lunch today?
That's what I wanna hear.
It really comes down to lunch choices.
That's what we wanna know.
How do humpbacks decide what they're eating for lunch?
Oh, the mysteries of the universe.
How do they find it?
That's what we wanna know.
And does it taste good?
Yeah, exactly.
And are the calves complaining?
They're like, oh, krill again?
Mom, give me milk.
Yes.
Yeah, my spell checker keeps trying to change
misdeceit to masticate.
And chewing is the one thing
that these whales definitely do not do.
They eat their victims whole.
Well, Lisa, Fred, Brenda, Josie, Jody,
thank you guys for joining us.
We really, really appreciate it.
Keep up the incredible work
and yeah, keep making the impossible not impossible.
And that wraps up another episode of the podcast
where we talk to some of the most fascinating people
who are transforming the impossible
into the not impossible.
A big thank you to the study team
for sharing how their work with whale communication
could pave the way for interspecies
and even interplanetary dialogue.
It's conversations like these that remind us
that even our most out of the world dreams
are within the limits of possibility.
Don't forget to follow us
on your favorite podcast platforms
and remember, change is hard.
But making the world a better place,
it's not impossible.
We recommend upgrading to the latest Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
Please check your internet connection and refresh the page. You might also try disabling any ad blockers.
You can visit our support center if you're having problems.