what if the mind could go where the body

cannot what if we could reach out into

the unknown seeing distant places hidden

spaces and even alternate times all

without moving a

muscle remote viewing it sounds like

science fiction yet some claim it's not

only possible but has been used in

Military and scientific

circles so what if the answer changes

everything we know

[Music]

hey everyone welcome back to Divergent

history where we dive into the biggest

what if questions of the past present

and future today we're venturing into

the mysterious realm of remote viewing

I'll admit this one's as intriguing as

it is strange and as always my skeptical

friend wendle is here to make sure we

keep our feet on the ground oh great so

we're talking about people seeing things

with with their eyes closed what's next

finding Atlantis by

daydreaming all right Wendell I I get it

uh it sounds out there but some really

interesting people and institutions

thought there was something to this so

let's dive into this world of psychic

spies secret government projects in some

claims that are hard to ignore first

things first what is remote viewing so

basically it's the ability to see things

without being physically present No

cameras no satellites just the power of

the Mind the idea is that with practice

you can send your awareness across vast

distances maybe even through time and

pick up on details as if you were there

in

person now remote viewing isn't

something new age thinkers came up with

during the Cold War government agencies

around the world funded serious Research

into it they were looking for ways to

gain intelligence locate hidden bases

and even predict events this wasn't a

casual side project there were real

budgets and teams dedicated to this let

me guess they were hoping people could

just close their eyes skip the paperwork

and save on travel

cost one of the best known remote

viewing efforts was the Stargate project

a top secret initiative funded by the US

government launched in the 1970s

Stargate employed psychics soldiers and

scientists to gather Intel on Soviet

bases locate missing individuals and

even get a peek at alien Tech if you

believe the

rumors and this was serious business

these viewers were given very little

information maybe just coordinates or a

vague prompt and asked to describe what

they saw amazingly sometimes they'd end

up sketching layouts location

in objects that were later confirmed to

exist so they doodled some buildings and

maybe got lucky sounds like a lot of

guesswork with a Sprinkle of

luck Ingle Swan is a name that comes up

a lot in remote viewing circles Swan was

an artist and one of the most successful

remote viewers in the Stargate project

his career included some pretty wild

claims like projecting his Consciousness

to Jupiter and yes even The Far Side of

the Moon one of his most famous

accomplishments you ask well Swan

claimed to see rings around Jupiter

something astronomers hadn't even

confirmed at that time years later when

the Voyager Mission finally made it to

Jupiter scientists confirmed that there

was indeed a faint ring around the

planet a lucky guess or maybe he was

just watching the the Science Channel

before

bed well maybe uh but he didn't stop

there wend Swan also claimed to see

structures activity and even beings on

the moon he described what looked like

mining operations machinery and

structures that were far from natural

and this wasn't just wild imagination

this guy was employed by the CIA and

paid well for his

skills I created an in-depth video on

his accounts of the activity on the moon

and included the link Down Below in the

comment section nice plug don't think we

don't know what you just did

[Music]

there now here's where things get even

stranger there are a handful of famous

remote viewing cases that still stir up

debate today let's dive into a few of

them and see why they've stuck around

in the early 1970s a remote viewer was

asked to locate a Soviet bomber that had

gone down somewhere in the

wilderness intelligence agencies had no

idea where it was and the area was way

too vast to search without some lead

this remote viewer given only the

mission goal described the exact terrain

and feature surround founding the crash

site when a search team followed the

viewer's subcription they found the

bomber exactly where it was supposed to

be now that's not the kind of thing you

can just guess the viewer had specific

landmarks elevations and even nearby

water features for something that was

supposed to be deep in the middle of

nowhere that's pretty impressive or

maybe they just had a thing for downed

bombers and Wilderness Landscapes right

place right

time then there's the case of Pat price

another famous remote viewer who worked

with the CIA price was a former police

officer with an uncanny ability to

sketch layouts of hidden or classified

sites in one instance he described a top

secret Soviet facility in remarkable

detail he sketched out building layouts

the placement of specific equipment and

even detailed underground storage

areas us intelligence later verified

that many of his descriptions were

accurate now think about that for a

second price was describing underground

facilities he couldn't possibly have

seen and he was getting it right if

that's not strange I don't know what is

either that or he had the world's most

reliable Insider sources but hey credit

where it's due

[Music]

during the Iranian hostage crisis of

1979 remote viewers were asked to locate

and report on the hostages conditions

they provided detailed descriptions of

the rooms the layout of the embassy and

the movements of guards some of these

reports were corroborated by On The

Ground Intelligence later giving some

legitimacy to the viewers

insights now you think this would be

hard to verify without direct access but

the descriptions were specific they

weren't just vague Impressions there

were details that aligned with the

actual layout of the embassy Which Intel

later

confirmed all right so they nailed down

a few room layouts but couldn't they

have just gone with the standard hostage

layout dimly lit rooms locked doors and

grumpy guards well maybe but the

alignment of details makes it harder to

brush off as lucky

guesses and here's your real curve ball

Swan Once claimed to remote view Mars he

described towering structures unusual

terrain and even what he believed were

Signs of Life this wasn't just

imagination Swan Drew sketches and took

detailed notes on Martian geography that

he claimed to have

seen and he was wasn't the only one

other remote viewers claim to have seen

ancient Martian civilizations and

structures it's one of the wildest

claims out there but it's led to some

interesting theories about Mars and our

distant past so now we've got remote

viewers seeing cities on Mars might as

well go all in and say they found

Starbucks up

there it's certainly out there I'll give

you that but these accounts have people

asking if there's more to Mars than

meets the eye

now it's one thing to hear these stories

but what does science have to say so

remote viewing has been tested sometimes

successfully but not without controversy

studies on extra sensory perception ESP

suggest that results might exceed random

chance but Skeptics argue that it could

be due to flawed methods selective

memory or outright bias for example some

experiments with ESP and remote viewing

show small but consistent results that

seem hard to explain these aren't huge

successes but rather subtle findings

that have kept researchers interested

small enough to say it's all a

coincidence but big enough to keep the

funding coming

right well that's one way to look at it

wend but it's also possible that science

hasn't yet developed the tools to

measure or explain what's happening with

remote viewing after all there was a

time when radio waves were invisible and

we didn't have a clue they

existed as intriguing as remote viewing

is it's only fair to take a step back

and look at some of the reasons people

are skeptical about it after all a

balanced perspective helps us understand

the full picture so let's dive into what

critics and scientists say might debunk

the entire concept of able

view first the scientific Community has

had a long-standing skepticism regarding

psychic phenomena including remote

viewing one of the core issues is that

remote viewing is notoriously hard to

replicate in a controlled environment

scientists like Dr Richard wisman a

well-known psychologist and skeptic

argue that for remote viewing to be

accepted scientist spefically it would

need to produce consistently reliable

results that can be reproduced by

different researchers under standardized

conditions fair enough now this lack of

consistent results is a significant

hurdle Dr wisman has stated if remote

viewing worked as reliably as proponents

claim it would be one of the most

important discoveries in human history

and we can disagree with that can we

wend but every time we test it under

control conditions it doesn't hold

up another criticism focuses on

confirmation bias and selective memory

Skeptics argue that remote viewing

successes are often exaggerated while

failures are ignored or rationalized

away Dr Michael shurmer a cognitive

psychologist and founder of the skeptic

Society explains that selective memory

plays a significant role in how we

perceive events like remote viewing when

people focus only on successful hits and

disregard the many misses it can create

an illusion of

accuracy Shermer points out that our

brains are wired to detect patterns in

assigned meaning even when none exists

so a remote viewer might accurately

describe a location one out of 10 times

but proponents might Focus only on that

single success while ignoring the nine

failures so they're basically playing a

numbers game and counting on us to

forget the times they totally missed the

mock exactly and Skeptics argue that

this tendency to highlight successes

over failures makes it seem like remote

viewing works better than it actually

does even agencies that once took an

interest in remote viewing like the CIA

eventually pulled back due to

inconclusive results the CIA initially

funded the Stargate project hoping to

gain an intelligence Advantage but after

years of research they concluded that

remote viewing didn't provide actionable

consistent results in a report following

the Project's end the CIA described

remote viewing as unreliable and

ultimately determined that it didn't

justify further

investment Dr Ray Hyman a Psy olist who

evaluated the Stargate Project's

findings concluded that there was no

clear evidence that remote viewing

produced results beyond what would be

expected by chance he said despite its

Allure the evidence simply does not

support the claims of reliable and

repeatable remote viewing capabilities

sounds like the CIA eventually decided

they'd rather spend their budget on

satellite imagery and good old-fashioned

Intel Gathering

psychologists also argue that

suggestibility may play a role in why

people believe remote viewing is real

Studies have shown that people who are

more open to suggestion or who have

strong imaginations May convince

themselves they're seeing something that

isn't there this is especially true in

cases where remote viewers are given

subtle cues or Prime with details about

a Target location beforehand

Dr Susan Blackmore a psychologist and

expert in paranormal phenomena suggests

that self- delusion and suggestion often

Drive psychic experiences including

remote viewing Blackmore notes when

people believe in a phenomenon they

become more likely to interpret

ambiguous images or vague impressions as

meaningful this can lead to an

experience that feels real even if it

isn't based on any objective reality

so in other words a person who already

believes in remote viewing might

interpret random shapes or thoughts as

solid information even if there's

nothing to back it

[Music]

up the Gans Feld experiment one of the

most famous tests for ESP and remote

viewing aimed to measure psychic

abilities in a controlled setting by

isolating participants from external

stimuli however results have been in

inclusive at best while some studies

showed small positive results others

showed no statistical

significance Skeptics argue that the

success rates could be due to

statistical anomalies rather than any

real psychic

abilities Dr Charles honorton one of the

leading proponents of the ganzfeld

experiment even admitted that while the

findings were intriguing they weren't

definitive without consistent replicable

results Skeptics argue that the evidence

just isn't there so even when they set

up the tests as scientifically as

possible it's still just a shot in the

dark that's not very reassuring if we're

hoping to find solid

proof finally Skeptics often point out

that techniques like cold reading where

someone makes General statements that

could apply to almost anyone can't mimic

the results of remote viewing Dr Ray

Hyman describes Cold reading as a way

for people to pick up on subtle cues or

project their own thoughts into vague

descriptions leading them to believe

they're seeing something specific when

it's really just broad

speculation so what we end up with is a

situation where viewers may not be

seeing anything extraordinary instead

they're relying on General Impressions

that they or those interpet their

results turn into something more

concrete than it really

[Music]

is so is remote viewing real well

there's no shortage of experts who argue

that it isn't from inconsistent results

to psychological explanations and self-

delusion the scientific Community

remains largely unconvinced while the

stories are fascinating and there are

certainly some surprising cas cases

remote viewing hasn't yet passed the

rigorous standards of reproducibility

and evidence that science demands guess

it's back to the drawing board or maybe

just a clearer view of

reality but here's the thing even if

remote viewing isn't a science the

Mysteries the stories and the

possibilities it raises keep us

wondering and that's what makes this

topic so endlessly intriguing there's a

part of us that wants to to be true even

if we know the odds aren't in its favor

or maybe we just like a good story to

keep things

interesting either way folks remote

viewing has captivated Minds for decades

Believers and Skeptics alike can agree

on one thing the human mind is

remarkable and a mysterious thing thank

you for joining us on this journey

through the unknown if you've got

thoughts theories or questions about

remote viewing drop them in the comments

below we love hearing from you and who

knows maybe your ideas will lead us to

our next big question now don't forget

to subscribe like and keep those curious

minds engaged I know you hear it a

million times but those small gestures

really will make a difference for

channels small like mine and remember

folks question everything even

me that's right wend until next time

keep exploring keep questioning and know

know that you are truly appreciated

[Music]