The Killing of French Au Pair, Sophie Lionnet | England
In the early hours of the morning on September 21st, 2017, firefighters were called to a residential street in Southfields, southwest London. Neighbours had contacted emergency services about an unusual smell – thick smoke drifting from the back garden of a terraced house on Wimbledon Park Road.
Southfields is a quiet area. Tree-lined streets, modest family homes, and a rhythm shaped by commuters and school schedules. When firefighters arrived, they found a small bonfire in the back garden. At first glance, it looked like someone burning garden waste or garbage.
As firefighters began to break apart the remains, they noticed something that didn't belong in an ordinary garden fire. Fragments of bone. Not animal bone, but human remains. Police were called immediately. The garden was sealed off. A forensic team was dispatched.
By mid-morning, investigators confirmed what firefighters had already suspected. A human body had been burned in the garden. The victim would later be identified as Sophie Lionnet, a twenty-one-year-old French woman who had been living in the house as a live-in au pair.
You are listening to: The Evidence Locker.
Thanks for listening to our podcast. This episode is made possible by our sponsors—be sure to check them out for exclusive deals. For an ad-free experience, join us on Patreon, starting at just $2 a month, with 25% of proceeds supporting The Doe Network, helping to bring closure to international cold cases. Links are in the show notes.
Our episodes cover true crimes involving real people, and some content may be graphic in nature. Listener discretion is advised. We produce each episode with the utmost respect for the victims, their families, and loved ones.
Sophie Madeleine Danielle Lionnet was born on January 7th, 1996, in Troyes, a municipality in the northeast of France. Troyes is a rural area about 62 miles from Paris. Sophie’s father, Patrick, worked as a municipal gardener, and her mother, Catherine Devallonne, raised Sophie after her parents divorced when she was young. Sophie moved with her mother to Paron, a small town on the edge of Burgundy.
Family and friends described Sophie as a kind, gentle girl who was always smiling. She was reserved and shy outside of her close circle, but she loved animals, children, and making people happy. Sophie had dreams of studying film at university, but instead, she pursued a practical path. After finishing school, she completed a vocational course in childcare.
Her father later recalled how good Sophie was with children and how she hoped to work in a nursery. No one expected her to leave France. Except for a school trip to Auschwitz, Sophie had never travelled abroad. But like many young people from small towns, she was drawn to the idea of living in a big city, improving her English, and earning money while gaining independence.
In late 2015, a friend of a friend introduced Sophie to a French couple living in London who were looking for an au pair. The job seemed ideal: she would care for two young children, live with the family, and receive room, board, and a weekly fee. Sophie told her parents she would only go for a couple of months. In January 2016, shortly after her 20th birthday, Sophie Lionnet moved to London.
Sophie arrived in London with high hopes. Her new employers were Sabrina Kouider, a 34-year-old fashion designer and makeup artist, and her partner, Ouissem Medouni, a 40-year-old banker. Both were French, which meant Sophie wouldn't face a language barrier at home. Sabrina told Sophie she worked in the fashion world and could introduce her to famous people. It all sounded exciting.
The couple lived in a house on Wimbledon Park Road in Southfields with Sabrina's two children from previous relationships: a four-year-old and a nine-year-old. According to Ouissem, he returned home from a trip to France in January 2016 (where he had been attending his father's funeral) and found a young woman sleeping in his home. That was Sophie, their new nanny.
At first, everything seemed fine. Sophie loved looking after the children and made friends with other nannies in the neighbourhood. She phoned her mother regularly and seemed happy. Neighbours and local shopkeepers remembered Sophie as a sweet, shy girl who was always polite. Michael Cromer, who owned a fish and chips shop nearby, saw Sophie several times a week. He later told reporters that she always had a smile on her face.
However, beneath the surface, things were far from normal. Sophie was living in a very dark and disturbing situation. She slept on a bunk bed in the children's room, not in a proper bedroom of her own. She worked extremely long hours for very little pay. Some reports suggest she received only £50 per month, far below the standard rate for an au pair in London. She was rarely allowed to leave the house alone, and when her mother fell ill, Sophie was not permitted to return to France to visit her.
Before long, the situation took a sinister turn.
Sabrina Kouider was not a stable person. In 2011, she had met Mark Walton, a founding member of the Irish boy band Boyzone who had since become a successful music producer and mogul. The relationship was turbulent. Walton later described Sabrina as someone who would often "flip" and "go crazy." She was intensely jealous and accused him of sleeping with male prostitutes. She even hid cameras in his house to spy on him. Eventually, Mark ended the relationship. Sabrina was devastated and returned to the arms of Ouissem Medouni, her longtime on-and-off partner.
But Sabrina never got over Mark Walton. Even after they split, she became obsessed with him. She stalked him, harassed him, and accused him of all sorts of outlandish crimes. She claimed he was using black magic on her. She said he hired a helicopter to fly over her home and spy on her. She even accused him of sexually abusing her cat. Over five years, Sabrina reported Mark Walton to police more than 30 times. Every single report turned out to be false. Police eventually gave her a caution for harassing Walton and accusing him of being a paedophile using a fake Facebook account.
Then, at some point, Sabrina's delusions turned towards Sophie. She became convinced that Sophie was working for Mark Walton, that Sophie had been sent to spy on her family and destroy them. There was no basis in reality for this belief. Sophie had never met Mark Walton. She had no connection to him whatsoever. But Sabrina managed to convince Ouissem that it was true.
The couple began to treat Sophie like a prisoner. They confiscated her identity card and passport. They stopped paying her wages. They denied her food. She was no longer allowed to leave the house. Neighbours began to notice that Sophie had disappeared from the streets. When they asked Ouissem about her, he was evasive, saying she had left or was busy with errands.
Sabrina also accused Sophie of stealing a diamond pendant. She called Sophie a whore, a bitch, and a slut for no reason. One neighbour, who witnessed Sabrina screaming at Sophie, asked her to stop. Sabrina replied that Sophie was lazy, that she didn't cook, that she didn't do anything. Another neighbour described Sabrina as "aggressive and violent."
Sophie was trapped. She had no documents, no money, and no way to escape. She confided in a few friends that life in the house was troubled, but she didn't know how to get out. At one point, Sophie left the house and stayed with a friend for two nights. But she returned. Perhaps she felt she had no other choice.
Over the weeks and months that followed, Sabrina and Ouissem subjected Sophie to prolonged and systematic abuse. They interrogated her for hours on end, demanding that she confess to working for Mark Walton. Sophie repeatedly denied the accusations. She had no idea what they were talking about. But Sabrina and Ouissem didn't believe her.
The couple recorded these interrogations on their mobile phones. In the videos, Sophie can be seen sitting or standing, visibly shaking and exhausted. She is slapped. She is compared to a Nazi collaborator. She is called "worse than a murderer." She is told she cannot leave until she confesses. She apologises over and over again, even though she doesn't understand what she's apologising for.
The interrogations were brutal. Sabrina and Ouissem hit Sophie with an electrical cable. They beat her so badly that she sustained five fractured ribs and a cracked breastbone. They starved her. In one video, taken just hours before her death, Sophie looks emaciated and broken. Her face is gaunt. She can barely speak.
The couple believed Sophie had drugged Ouissem and was plotting with Mark Walton to sexually abuse members of their family. It was a complete fiction, a shared delusion that had consumed them both. Prosecutors would later describe it as folie à deux – a rare psychological disorder where a delusional belief is transmitted from one person to another.
On the night of September 19th, 2017, Sabrina and Ouissem took Sophie to the bathroom. According to their nine-year-old child, who later testified in court, they could hear Sophie screaming from the bathroom. There was a lot of splashing water that seeped under the door. The child heard the defendants telling Sophie to "breathe."
The next morning, the child asked their mother what had happened the night before. Sabrina told them that Sophie was gone.
Sophie Lionnet died in that bathroom. The exact cause of death could not be determined due to the severity of the burns inflicted on her body afterwards. However, prosecutors believed she died as a result of a combination of physical assault and drowning. She had sustained multiple fractures in the days leading up to her death, and the forensic evidence suggested she had been subjected to sustained violence.
After Sophie died, Sabrina and Ouissem kept her body in a suitcase in the garden shed for two days. They were unsure of what to do next. Finally, on September 20th, they decided to dispose of her body by burning it on a bonfire in the back garden. To mask the smell of burning flesh, they barbecued chicken on the grill nearby.
As the fire burned, neighbours began to notice the thick, pungent smoke. Children playing nearby thought it might be a barbecue. One little boy poked his head over the fence and saw Ouissem putting sticks on the fire. When firefighters arrived a couple of hours later, Ouissem told them the remains in the fire were those of a sheep he had bought at a market. They didn't believe him.
By the time police arrived, the body was charred beyond recognition. But forensic investigators were able to identify Sophie using dental records. Her employers, Sabrina Kouider and Ouissem Medouni, were arrested at the scene.
After their arrest, Sabrina and Ouissem were questioned by Surrey Police. From the start, they admitted to disposing of Sophie's body, but both denied murdering her. Instead, they pointed the finger at each other.
At first, Ouissem claimed that Sophie had died by accident. He said he was interrogating her in the bath when he punched her, and her head flew back and hit the bathroom tiles. She slipped and lost consciousness. He offered to plead guilty to manslaughter. However, when he learned that Sabrina was blaming him for the murder, he changed his story. He claimed he had been asleep and that Sabrina had woken him up, telling him Sophie wasn't breathing. When he got to the bathroom, Sophie was already dead in the bathtub.
Sabrina's story was different. She claimed that Ouissem had killed Sophie and then demanded they have sex while Sophie's body lay dead nearby. She acknowledged that she had hit Sophie "really bad" with an electrical cable, but she insisted she never intended to kill her.
The trial of Sabrina Kouider and Ouissem Medouni began at the Old Bailey in March 2018. Prosecutor Richard Horwell QC described the couple as a "truly toxic combination" driven by an "unhealthy, myopic, all-consuming and groundless obsession" with Mark Walton. He told the jury:
"Sophie was trapped in a domestic nightmare."
Over the course of the two-month trial, the jury was shown excerpts from more than eight hours of recorded interrogations. They watched Sophie being slapped, accused, and tortured. They heard her beg for mercy. They saw her emaciated body in the final video, taken just hours before her death.
The prosecution argued that Sophie's death was not an accident, but the culmination of prolonged and deliberate abuse. Prosecutor Aisling Hosein said:
"Only Kouider and Medouni know exactly how they killed Sophie, but the prosecution was able to prove that she died as a result of purposeful and sustained violence, and not by accident."
Mark Walton travelled from Los Angeles to testify at the trial. He told the court that he had never met Sophie Lionnet. He described his two-year relationship with Kouider as "turbulent" and confirmed that she would often "flip" and "go crazy." He had no idea why Sabrina had become so obsessed with him.
The jury also heard from the couple's nine-year-old child, who testified about the night Sophie died. The child remembered hearing Sophie screaming from the bathroom and the sound of splashing water. They remembered their mother telling them the next morning that Sophie was gone.
Judge Nicholas Hilliard QC addressed the jury during the trial. He made it clear that while Sabrina's delusional beliefs might explain certain actions, they did not excuse prolonged violence or the deliberate mistreatment of another person. He said:
"The allegations she was plotting with Mr Walton to abuse the family were a complete fiction. There was no excuse for the horrible cruelty and humiliation the defendants exacted on Miss Lionnet during taped interrogations before her death."
After several weeks of evidence, the jury retired to deliberate. They spent nearly 30 hours discussing the case. On May 24th, 2018, they returned with their verdict. Sabrina Kouider was found guilty of murder by a unanimous decision. Ouissem Medouni was found guilty of murder by a majority decision of 10 to 2. Both were also found guilty of perverting the course of justice for attempting to destroy Sophie's body.
Sabrina Kouider broke into tears when the verdict was read. Ouissem Medouni showed no emotion.
Sophie's parents, Catherine Devallonne and Patrick Lionnet, attended the trial. After the verdict was announced, Catherine made a statement outside the Old Bailey. She said:
"These self-obsessed individuals who murdered Sophie did not believe Sophie had a value. Those monsters repeatedly beat Sophie. They starved, tortured and broke her until she could no longer fight. They took away her dignity and finally her life painfully ebbed away until Sophie struggled to take her final terrified breath in the bath."
Patrick Lionnet added:
"Sabrina and Ouissem have not only stolen the life of my daughter so brutally and without remorse, they have also stolen mine. My sleep, my happiness, my peace of mind and my future. The laughs, the hugs, the family celebrations, these special moments, they have all been tragically and brutally cut short by the people that had responsibility for Sophie's care and wellbeing whilst she was employed by them."
On June 26th, 2018, Sabrina Kouider and Ouissem Medouni were sentenced at the Old Bailey. Judge Nicholas Hilliard QC had the final word. He said:
"It is plain from all the evidence that Sophie was a kind, gentle and good natured girl. I'm sure on all the evidence you were both involved in torturing Sophie in the bath in the lead up to her death in making her think she would drown unless you gave her information you wanted which was not in her power to give because it did not exist. The suffering and the torture you put her through before her death was prolonged and without pity."
He continued:
"I do not think you thought for one moment you were acting lawfully. I'm sure you knew the way you interrogated her was unacceptable in the extreme, that it was unlawful to assault her and she was in a dreadful state by the time of her death and torturing her in the bath was totally and utterly wrong."
Judge Hilliard sentenced both Sabrina Kouider and Ouissem Medouni to life imprisonment, with a minimum term of 30 years before eligibility for parole.
At the sentencing hearing, a letter Kouider had written to Sophie's family was read aloud. In it, she expressed deep remorse and wished she could turn back the clock. But for Sophie's family, it was too little, too late.
Sophie's mother, Catherine, told reporters after the sentencing that if she had known what Sophie was going through, she would have done "everything possible" to get her daughter home. She said Sophie must have been hiding the truth to protect her family. She added:
"No god will forgive you. That's what they deserve. It's maybe cruel but what they did was even more cruel."
Sophie's father, Patrick, said simply:
"These people do not deserve to live."
In the aftermath of the trial, Sophie's case sparked renewed discussion about the vulnerability of live-in domestic workers, particularly au pairs. Advocacy organisations pointed out that such workers often occupy a grey area in employment law, especially when arrangements are informal. Sophie's isolation had been facilitated by the structure of her work. She lived where she worked. Her documents were held by her employers. Her social world was limited. These conditions, while not inherently abusive, created an environment in which abuse could flourish unnoticed.
The British Au Pair Agencies Association released a statement after the trial, urging would-be au pairs to go through reputable agencies that interview host families and provide support. However, they acknowledged that even with these safeguards, there was no guarantee that what happened to Sophie could have been prevented. The killers were the problem, not Sophie or the fact that she was an au pair.
Sophie Lionnet did not disappear. She was not abducted or trafficked. She lived in a family home, on an ordinary street, in one of the world's most closely monitored cities. What happened to her unfolded gradually, through a series of small decisions that removed her independence and stripped away her ability to leave. By the time her situation became visible to authorities, it was already too late.
Sophie's case remains one of the clearest examples of how abuse can be concealed behind closed doors, and how easily vulnerability can be exploited when power goes unchallenged.
If you'd like to dive deeper into this case, check out the resources we used for this episode in the show notes.
Don’t forget to follow us on social media for more updates on today's case – you can find us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and X. We also have a channel on YouTube where you can watch more content.
If you enjoy what we do here at Evidence Locker, please subscribe on Apple Podcasts or wherever you're listening right now and consider leaving us a 5-star review.
This was The Evidence Locker. Thank you for listening!