00:00:00,420
→
00:00:03,150
Page 94: the Private Eye Podcast
00:00:03,925
→
00:00:05,235
hello, everybody, and welcome to
00:00:05,469
→
00:00:06,119
episode of
00:00:06,489
→
00:00:07,160
94.
00:00:07,409
→
00:00:07,969
My name's Andrew
00:00:08,145
→
00:00:08,415
Murray,
00:00:08,459
→
00:00:11,539
I'm here in the iStudio with Helen Lewis, Adam McQueen, and
00:00:11,559
→
00:00:12,279
Ian Hislop.
00:00:12,739
→
00:00:14,019
I'm gonna start off by saying to you
00:00:14,029
→
00:00:14,359
all,
00:00:15,319
→
00:00:15,649
Hey.
00:00:16,049
→
00:00:16,519
Hey.
00:00:16,559
→
00:00:17,629
hey And I say
00:00:17,669
→
00:00:18,579
Hay because we're going
00:00:18,635
→
00:00:18,925
the Hay
00:00:18,929
→
00:00:20,149
Festival.
00:00:20,419
→
00:00:22,409
We have a live Page 94.
00:00:22,809
→
00:00:22,969
That
00:00:23,129
→
00:00:23,369
was
00:00:23,369
→
00:00:24,079
the cheesiest yeah,
00:00:24,139
→
00:00:24,559
think.
00:00:24,565
→
00:00:24,695
I
00:00:24,699
→
00:00:25,149
liked
00:00:25,149
→
00:00:25,419
it.
00:00:25,419
→
00:00:25,479
yeah.
00:00:25,669
→
00:00:26,619
you would ... I'm gonna
00:00:26,745
→
00:00:27,135
old time.
00:00:27,135
→
00:00:27,295
Yeah.
00:00:28,219
→
00:00:29,149
we're doing a live
00:00:29,149
→
00:00:29,409
event
00:00:29,489
→
00:00:29,929
the Hay
00:00:29,929
→
00:00:31,489
Festival, which is
00:00:31,536
→
00:00:32,226
easy commute
00:00:32,312
→
00:00:34,302
from anywhere in the United Kingdom.
00:00:34,442
→
00:00:36,032
Incredibly fast.
00:00:36,113
→
00:00:36,917
Yes, we're gonna be
00:00:36,917
→
00:00:37,617
setting the world
00:00:37,617
→
00:00:37,727
to
00:00:37,727
→
00:00:38,177
rights, as
00:00:38,198
→
00:00:38,758
we always
00:00:38,758
→
00:00:39,488
do, but this time
00:00:39,557
→
00:00:39,837
be doing
00:00:39,837
→
00:00:40,267
it live.
00:00:40,887
→
00:00:41,037
so
00:00:41,037
→
00:00:42,017
that is gonna be on
00:00:42,017
→
00:00:42,287
the
00:00:42,367
→
00:00:42,987
27th
00:00:42,987
→
00:00:43,217
of May.
00:00:43,604
→
00:00:44,364
What day was that?
00:00:44,737
→
00:00:45,067
27th
00:00:45,067
→
00:00:45,417
of
00:00:45,417
→
00:00:45,777
May.
00:00:45,906
→
00:00:46,646
that a Wednesday
00:00:46,713
→
00:00:46,963
by any
00:00:46,963
→
00:00:47,393
chance?
00:00:47,496
→
00:00:47,826
I believe
00:00:47,857
→
00:00:47,927
it
00:00:47,927
→
00:00:48,317
is.
00:00:48,536
→
00:00:49,856
And what time would that be, Andy?
00:00:50,286
→
00:00:51,316
Oh, early evening.
00:00:52,053
→
00:00:52,203
evening.
00:00:52,916
→
00:00:53,746
Just turn up whenever.
00:00:55,256
→
00:00:56,366
7:30, I think.
00:00:56,896
→
00:00:57,346
But it might be,
00:00:57,346
→
00:00:58,896
6:30. So cut that
00:00:58,923
→
00:00:59,403
I think.
00:00:59,403
→
00:00:59,513
we
00:00:59,513
→
00:00:59,843
should
00:01:00,236
→
00:01:00,616
find
00:01:00,637
→
00:01:00,987
out.
00:01:01,177
→
00:01:01,557
to be fair, they
00:01:01,557
→
00:01:03,797
can't do it without us, so if we only turn up at 7:30.
00:01:03,797
→
00:01:03,917
Yeah.
00:01:04,407
→
00:01:04,667
Hang on
00:01:05,482
→
00:01:07,232
7:00. Phew.
00:01:07,432
→
00:01:07,842
Neither of
00:01:07,873
→
00:01:08,273
the ones that
00:01:08,273
→
00:01:08,823
we completely
00:01:08,899
→
00:01:09,609
suggested could be correct.
00:01:10,257
→
00:01:10,872
And all
00:01:10,872
→
00:01:11,562
four of us are doing
00:01:11,562
→
00:01:12,522
separate events around
00:01:12,522
→
00:01:12,732
Hay.
00:01:12,752
→
00:01:13,622
So also on
00:01:13,642
→
00:01:15,002
27th, Ian, you're gonna be
00:01:15,062
→
00:01:16,802
interviewed, by Paddy O'Connell.
00:01:16,928
→
00:01:17,288
Yes.
00:01:17,288
→
00:01:17,368
And
00:01:17,368
→
00:01:18,098
I'm gonna be talking
00:01:18,098
→
00:01:18,538
about
00:01:19,238
→
00:01:20,318
my favorite books
00:01:20,331
→
00:01:21,551
that have influenced
00:01:21,598
→
00:01:21,758
my
00:01:21,758
→
00:01:22,178
life
00:01:22,178
→
00:01:24,028
and it says career, but I
00:01:24,028
→
00:01:24,528
think that might
00:01:24,528
→
00:01:24,678
be
00:01:25,051
→
00:01:25,281
it.
00:01:25,457
→
00:01:25,557
it.
00:01:26,520
→
00:01:26,900
Adam, you're
00:01:26,930
→
00:01:27,350
doing an event,
00:01:27,380
→
00:01:27,620
also
00:01:27,650
→
00:01:28,950
the 27th, about tribalism in
00:01:28,950
→
00:01:29,630
politics.
00:01:29,660
→
00:01:32,030
Apparently with Penny Mordaunt and Guto Hari.
00:01:32,260
→
00:01:32,580
Wow.
00:01:32,637
→
00:01:33,207
together at last.
00:01:33,207
→
00:01:33,377
Will
00:01:33,377
→
00:01:33,807
you be carrying a
00:01:33,807
→
00:01:34,037
big
00:01:34,037
→
00:01:34,487
sword?
00:01:34,517
→
00:01:34,607
I
00:01:34,607
→
00:01:34,927
will.
00:01:34,990
→
00:01:35,240
Yeah.
00:01:35,270
→
00:01:35,780
Yeah, we all have to.
00:01:35,780
→
00:01:36,040
Excellent.
00:01:36,040
→
00:01:36,210
That's
00:01:36,260
→
00:01:36,360
That's
00:01:36,360
→
00:01:36,930
contractual,
00:01:37,000
→
00:01:37,060
yeah.
00:01:37,740
→
00:01:38,120
Helen,
00:01:38,120
→
00:01:38,210
you're
00:01:38,210
→
00:01:38,910
gonna be- talking about
00:01:38,910
→
00:01:39,410
America
00:01:39,470
→
00:01:40,280
250.
00:01:40,410
→
00:01:40,720
I've got
00:01:40,740
→
00:01:41,100
a really
00:01:41,507
→
00:01:41,697
panel.
00:01:41,860
→
00:01:42,830
They're all just so much
00:01:42,857
→
00:01:43,517
more impressive than
00:01:43,530
→
00:01:43,690
than me.
00:01:43,770
→
00:01:44,090
What is it?
00:01:44,090
→
00:01:47,610
The hemi-semi-sesquipali-centenary of America or
00:01:47,640
→
00:01:47,970
something.
00:01:47,970
→
00:01:49,260
Semi- There's some complicated word
00:01:49,260
→
00:01:49,730
that means
00:01:49,750
→
00:01:50,540
250 years.
00:01:50,540
→
00:01:51,040
250.
00:01:51,040
→
00:01:51,340
years.
00:01:51,370
→
00:01:52,050
Fantastic.
00:01:52,790
→
00:01:53,360
and I'll
00:01:53,390
→
00:01:53,660
be doing
00:01:53,660
→
00:01:54,060
an event on
00:01:54,080
→
00:01:54,870
26th
00:01:55,090
→
00:01:57,200
at 2:30 PM about my new book.
00:01:57,230
→
00:01:57,350
Have
00:01:57,380
→
00:01:58,060
you got a new book
00:01:58,060
→
00:01:58,090
out,
00:01:58,340
→
00:01:58,390
I've
00:01:58,390
→
00:01:58,550
got a
00:01:58,550
→
00:01:59,120
new book out.
00:01:59,120
→
00:01:59,430
Is that
00:01:59,430
→
00:02:01,010
available to pre-order by any chance?
00:02:01,010
→
00:02:01,580
Do you know?
00:02:01,620
→
00:02:01,760
I
00:02:01,770
→
00:02:02,530
think it is.
00:02:02,560
→
00:02:03,040
Great news.
00:02:03,106
→
00:02:03,793
I thought we didn't
00:02:03,849
→
00:02:04,099
read
00:02:04,099
→
00:02:05,779
out adverts on this podcast.
00:02:05,779
→
00:02:06,279
Only for us, though.
00:02:06,293
→
00:02:06,353
I'm
00:02:06,369
→
00:02:06,709
sorry,
00:02:06,709
→
00:02:06,859
yeah.
00:02:06,903
→
00:02:07,573
There's been
00:02:07,573
→
00:02:08,073
a change of
00:02:08,113
→
00:02:08,563
policy.
00:02:09,013
→
00:02:09,523
can I point
00:02:09,523
→
00:02:09,863
out my
00:02:10,103
→
00:02:11,213
available for pre-order as well?
00:02:11,323
→
00:02:11,493
Yeah.
00:02:11,579
→
00:02:11,819
plug ever.
00:02:11,912
→
00:02:12,812
corner ends.
00:02:12,842
→
00:02:12,932
Yeah.
00:02:12,962
→
00:02:13,212
And
00:02:13,238
→
00:02:13,609
now,
00:02:14,109
→
00:02:16,743
from one, exciting race between four very
00:02:16,743
→
00:02:17,863
dynamic candidates,
00:02:17,863
→
00:02:18,023
only
00:02:18,042
→
00:02:19,822
one of whom is a woman, we move to Labor
00:02:20,030
→
00:02:20,100
How
00:02:20,100
→
00:02:21,190
was that?
00:02:21,202
→
00:02:22,222
That
00:02:22,222
→
00:02:22,392
was
00:02:22,393
→
00:02:22,713
that?
00:02:22,920
→
00:02:23,160
Brilliant.
00:02:23,160
→
00:02:23,750
That
00:02:23,750
→
00:02:23,920
was
00:02:23,922
→
00:02:24,102
good.
00:02:24,377
→
00:02:24,562
why
00:02:24,648
→
00:02:25,238
we have to do this?
00:02:25,238
→
00:02:26,298
Why is this all going on now?
00:02:26,435
→
00:02:26,595
Thing
00:02:26,614
→
00:02:27,083
is, I'm
00:02:27,083
→
00:02:27,923
black pilled about this.
00:02:27,953
→
00:02:28,073
I
00:02:28,073
→
00:02:28,293
don't
00:02:28,293
→
00:02:28,823
think any of these
00:02:28,994
→
00:02:31,554
are gonna make any difference to the intractable problems
00:02:31,554
→
00:02:32,414
we've got In our, our...
00:02:32,504
→
00:02:33,314
So I'm just going to,
00:02:33,813
→
00:02:34,263
just going to
00:02:34,270
→
00:02:35,390
enjoy them knifing
00:02:35,524
→
00:02:35,774
other.
00:02:36,309
→
00:02:37,119
the
00:02:37,124
→
00:02:37,964
assures that, that it?
00:02:38,244
→
00:02:38,564
doesn't
00:02:38,564
→
00:02:39,004
matter
00:02:39,104
→
00:02:39,494
really That's a
00:02:39,634
→
00:02:39,834
Game
00:02:39,834
→
00:02:40,304
of Thrones
00:02:40,304
→
00:02:40,404
and
00:02:40,404
→
00:02:41,024
Succession
00:02:41,044
→
00:02:42,014
viewer right there, isn't it?
00:02:42,014
→
00:02:42,184
But
00:02:42,304
→
00:02:42,544
know what I
00:02:42,544
→
00:02:42,674
mean.
00:02:42,674
→
00:02:43,664
It's really quite sad.
00:02:43,844
→
00:02:44,984
I think they've got some very
00:02:44,994
→
00:02:45,374
large
00:02:45,374
→
00:02:46,294
problems in, Britain,
00:02:46,414
→
00:02:49,544
but, if you look at the difference, between... K- Keir Starmer obviously now
00:02:49,544
→
00:02:51,204
drained of all authority.
00:02:51,814
→
00:02:52,204
Angela
00:02:52,234
→
00:02:53,014
Rayner did a very
00:02:53,214
→
00:02:53,494
odd,
00:02:54,604
→
00:02:57,394
mini manifesto where she said she wanted to end freehold.
00:02:57,869
→
00:02:59,479
Which is not really that possible, like
00:02:59,525
→
00:03:00,415
people owning homes.
00:03:00,419
→
00:03:00,579
Okay.
00:03:01,299
→
00:03:01,519
Andy
00:03:01,554
→
00:03:02,084
Burnham gave an
00:03:02,084
→
00:03:02,324
interview
00:03:02,399
→
00:03:04,279
the New Statesman last year ahead of conference, in which he said,
00:03:04,279
→
00:03:05,429
"I w- I will do more borrowing.
00:03:05,429
→
00:03:09,009
I won't be cowed by the bond markets." Last person who said that was-
00:03:09,384
→
00:03:11,164
There's Liz Truss ... Liz
00:03:11,365
→
00:03:11,535
great.
00:03:11,535
→
00:03:12,055
And also the
00:03:12,055
→
00:03:12,465
phrase,
00:03:12,465
→
00:03:13,075
we can't be in
00:03:13,075
→
00:03:14,385
Hock to
00:03:14,385
→
00:03:14,445
the
00:03:14,445
→
00:03:16,385
bond markets." Hock is what you
00:03:16,385
→
00:03:16,825
are-
00:03:16,825
→
00:03:17,145
Yeah
00:03:17,179
→
00:03:17,389
if
00:03:17,389
→
00:03:17,689
you,
00:03:18,465
→
00:03:18,785
go
00:03:18,785
→
00:03:19,845
for more borrowing.
00:03:20,045
→
00:03:20,245
It was a
00:03:20,605
→
00:03:20,795
very
00:03:20,795
→
00:03:23,115
strange idea that I don't want to be,
00:03:24,085
→
00:03:27,625
responsible for borrowing a lot, and then have the people I've
00:03:27,715
→
00:03:28,995
borrowed off asking for the money
00:03:28,995
→
00:03:29,255
back.
00:03:30,315
→
00:03:30,425
it
00:03:30,434
→
00:03:30,734
doesn't
00:03:30,734
→
00:03:31,094
work like that.
00:03:31,094
→
00:03:31,514
Yeah, you don't
00:03:31,514
→
00:03:31,634
get
00:03:31,634
→
00:03:32,484
to pick what interest
00:03:32,719
→
00:03:33,009
people
00:03:33,009
→
00:03:33,589
are charging you
00:03:33,589
→
00:03:34,139
on your money, I'm
00:03:34,139
→
00:03:34,439
afraid.
00:03:34,879
→
00:03:36,219
So then we've got Wes Streeting.
00:03:36,649
→
00:03:36,699
We've
00:03:36,699
→
00:03:37,059
got Wes
00:03:37,059
→
00:03:37,389
" Streeting.
00:03:37,389
→
00:03:37,849
I don't know if he
00:03:37,934
→
00:03:38,404
said anything.
00:03:38,434
→
00:03:38,764
Oh,
00:03:38,949
→
00:03:39,419
actually,
00:03:39,449
→
00:03:40,239
he came... So he
00:03:40,239
→
00:03:41,969
immediately, He, resigned from the
00:03:41,969
→
00:03:42,409
cabinet,
00:03:43,419
→
00:03:43,989
resigned his house.
00:03:44,249
→
00:03:45,379
said, "I've had an amazing time.
00:03:45,379
→
00:03:46,159
We've got waiting list
00:03:46,159
→
00:03:46,779
downs, but that's
00:03:46,805
→
00:03:46,885
it.
00:03:46,885
→
00:03:47,855
I'm leaving." Yeah.
00:03:47,899
→
00:03:48,409
always go out on a
00:03:48,409
→
00:03:48,889
high note.
00:03:49,119
→
00:03:49,329
And then
00:03:49,329
→
00:03:51,579
he went to the Progress conference and said, "By the way, I'd
00:03:51,579
→
00:03:51,849
love us
00:03:51,849
→
00:03:52,789
to rejoin the
00:03:52,789
→
00:03:52,949
EU."
00:03:53,744
→
00:03:54,314
Very funny,
00:03:55,009
→
00:03:55,349
you have to be
00:03:55,349
→
00:03:56,259
quite steeped in Labour
00:03:56,259
→
00:03:56,399
law
00:03:56,399
→
00:03:57,819
to understand why this is so funny, which
00:03:57,819
→
00:03:58,999
I, I understand
00:03:59,035
→
00:03:59,435
that some people
00:03:59,499
→
00:04:00,289
have lives and
00:04:00,289
→
00:04:02,069
fulfilling personal time.
00:04:02,909
→
00:04:05,699
the Labour membership are mustard
00:04:05,699
→
00:04:06,129
keen on the
00:04:06,129
→
00:04:06,439
EU.
00:04:06,469
→
00:04:07,459
They absolutely love it.
00:04:07,729
→
00:04:08,679
So when Keir Starmer was
00:04:08,679
→
00:04:09,029
running in
00:04:09,029
→
00:04:14,382
2020 he said, "I will basically be continuity Corbynism, love that guy, but I
00:04:14,417
→
00:04:15,477
think we could have done a bit more on
00:04:15,509
→
00:04:16,189
antisemitism,
00:04:16,342
→
00:04:17,052
plus I'm much more
00:04:17,079
→
00:04:18,249
keen on Europe than he is."
00:04:18,562
→
00:04:21,422
' Cause he knew this was the way it was safe to dissent from
00:04:21,422
→
00:04:22,692
the leadership line in a way
00:04:22,692
→
00:04:25,242
that the members who were generally very pro-Corbyn
00:04:25,242
→
00:04:25,642
liked.
00:04:26,422
→
00:04:26,842
Streeting has done
00:04:26,842
→
00:04:27,592
exactly the same.
00:04:27,822
→
00:04:30,222
I know you think I'm all in, I'm incredibly right-wing
00:04:30,542
→
00:04:32,412
for a Labour person, but by
00:04:32,507
→
00:04:33,097
the Lord, I
00:04:33,097
→
00:04:33,327
love
00:04:33,372
→
00:04:34,152
EU, right?
00:04:34,839
→
00:04:34,929
It
00:04:34,947
→
00:04:35,187
also
00:04:35,332
→
00:04:35,432
this
00:04:35,432
→
00:04:36,412
secondary, excellently
00:04:36,412
→
00:04:38,672
funny effect of stuffing Andy Burnham, who
00:04:38,672
→
00:04:39,142
will never
00:04:39,342
→
00:04:40,262
be asked whether or not He
00:04:40,262
→
00:04:40,542
thinks
00:04:40,542
→
00:04:40,632
we
00:04:40,632
→
00:04:41,642
should rejoin the EU.
00:04:42,602
→
00:04:42,842
He
00:04:42,842
→
00:04:43,642
has to now, if
00:04:43,752
→
00:04:43,912
his
00:04:43,912
→
00:04:44,492
plan is
00:04:44,752
→
00:04:47,022
fight this by-election and then fight the Labour
00:04:47,022
→
00:04:49,322
leadership election, if it's contested, he needs to get the
00:04:49,322
→
00:04:50,012
members on side.
00:04:50,432
→
00:04:51,772
So in order to get the members on side, he
00:04:51,772
→
00:04:53,242
needs to go, "God, I love the EU.
00:04:53,242
→
00:04:55,382
I wish to be buried in a flag with the stars
00:04:55,382
→
00:04:56,392
on It My mother
00:04:56,392
→
00:04:57,562
is Ursula von der Leyen."
00:04:58,152
→
00:04:58,352
"I,
00:04:58,702
→
00:05:00,779
have a big portrait of Jacques Chirac in my office."
00:05:00,974
→
00:05:01,664
Whatever it might be.
00:05:02,179
→
00:05:03,079
But he's about
00:05:03,104
→
00:05:03,964
to fight a very
00:05:04,499
→
00:05:06,589
reform facing Brexity seat.
00:05:06,979
→
00:05:11,069
So if he says, lads, we'll all be speaking French by Christmas, great
00:05:11,069
→
00:05:14,529
for the second election he's got in his future, very bad for the one now.
00:05:15,169
→
00:05:15,269
So
00:05:15,304
→
00:05:15,934
he is going to have
00:05:15,999
→
00:05:19,159
do some good old-fashioned Ne- New Labour style triangulation
00:05:19,199
→
00:05:19,849
if this becomes an issue.
00:05:19,849
→
00:05:20,329
But it's, not
00:05:20,354
→
00:05:20,474
his
00:05:20,474
→
00:05:20,704
only
00:05:20,979
→
00:05:22,829
' cause he's fighting this by-election, if,
00:05:22,829
→
00:05:23,829
he gets the nomination,
00:05:23,829
→
00:05:24,019
on
00:05:24,019
→
00:05:24,089
the
00:05:24,114
→
00:05:24,674
grounds of
00:05:25,444
→
00:05:25,744
If you
00:05:25,774
→
00:05:26,384
hate the Labour
00:05:26,385
→
00:05:26,895
government,
00:05:27,405
→
00:05:27,705
vote
00:05:27,705
→
00:05:28,085
Labour.
00:05:28,794
→
00:05:30,584
Which is an odd position, isn't it?
00:05:30,584
→
00:05:31,034
You've got to vote
00:05:31,034
→
00:05:31,134
for
00:05:31,134
→
00:05:32,379
him In order to
00:05:32,554
→
00:05:33,514
Keir Starmer out.
00:05:33,539
→
00:05:34,139
Yeah ...essentially.
00:05:34,139
→
00:05:34,209
Here's our
00:05:34,220
→
00:05:34,400
argument.
00:05:34,400
→
00:05:35,140
All, everyone, will
00:05:35,244
→
00:05:37,361
saying, "Hate Starmer? Vote for me." the- I
00:05:37,361
→
00:05:37,861
think Keir
00:05:37,888
→
00:05:38,288
Starmer
00:05:38,288
→
00:05:40,068
should run on that.
00:05:40,068
→
00:05:40,348
Yeah.
00:05:40,398
→
00:05:40,918
platform.
00:05:40,918
→
00:05:41,628
You hate me.
00:05:41,628
→
00:05:42,008
Okay, you hate me.
00:05:42,008
→
00:05:42,138
you
00:05:42,138
→
00:05:42,428
hate me.
00:05:42,468
→
00:05:43,898
But you hate everyone else more.
00:05:44,391
→
00:05:45,101
Can we just come
00:05:45,101
→
00:05:46,051
back to Keir Starmer
00:05:46,051
→
00:05:46,611
for a second?
00:05:46,641
→
00:05:46,901
Yes.
00:05:46,901
→
00:05:47,061
Yeah.
00:05:47,131
→
00:05:48,631
'Cause the chucking
00:05:48,631
→
00:05:54,021
threshold for prime ministers seems to have been creeping downwards, I would say.
00:05:54,698
→
00:05:54,888
Liz
00:05:54,888
→
00:05:55,268
Truss,
00:05:56,001
→
00:05:56,431
I get it.
00:05:56,571
→
00:05:56,961
I get why
00:05:56,961
→
00:05:57,131
she
00:05:57,131
→
00:05:57,271
had
00:05:57,308
→
00:05:57,368
to
00:05:57,368
→
00:05:57,518
go.
00:05:57,926
→
00:05:58,586
Boris Johnson,
00:05:58,612
→
00:05:59,802
Rishi Sunak lost an election.
00:06:01,858
→
00:06:02,038
what's
00:06:02,277
→
00:06:02,527
done?
00:06:02,842
→
00:06:03,222
Nothing.
00:06:03,392
→
00:06:03,972
That's the problem.
00:06:04,437
→
00:06:04,677
Really.
00:06:04,677
→
00:06:04,707
They've
00:06:04,812
→
00:06:05,012
the
00:06:05,012
→
00:06:05,982
haunting thing that k-
00:06:05,982
→
00:06:07,512
keeps coming out again and again is the idea that
00:06:07,537
→
00:06:08,337
people don't know
00:06:08,352
→
00:06:12,172
what he stands for, who he thinks he's for and against, what his vision is.
00:06:12,542
→
00:06:14,912
So the classic idea of the Prime Minister is that
00:06:14,912
→
00:06:18,332
you set the terms of the debate, so people can make decisions because
00:06:18,357
→
00:06:19,127
they know what you
00:06:19,262
→
00:06:19,532
do
00:06:19,532
→
00:06:19,812
in that
00:06:19,848
→
00:06:20,258
circumstance.
00:06:20,982
→
00:06:23,222
And what people report from inside that operation is
00:06:23,247
→
00:06:23,467
that they
00:06:23,467
→
00:06:24,167
don't know
00:06:24,552
→
00:06:25,162
how Starmer would
00:06:25,162
→
00:06:26,092
jump on something.
00:06:26,342
→
00:06:27,552
It paralyzes.
00:06:27,742
→
00:06:27,952
But he's
00:06:27,987
→
00:06:28,567
also not a very
00:06:28,752
→
00:06:29,342
decision-maker
00:06:29,342
→
00:06:30,822
himself, so nobody
00:06:30,857
→
00:06:31,417
knows what to
00:06:31,417
→
00:06:31,707
do.
00:06:31,832
→
00:06:33,102
stuff just gets in this holding
00:06:33,102
→
00:06:34,072
pattern, basically.
00:06:34,507
→
00:06:35,517
With welfare reform,
00:06:35,592
→
00:06:36,112
tried to put
00:06:36,112
→
00:06:37,752
something that was quite tough, didn't get
00:06:37,777
→
00:06:37,937
it,
00:06:38,017
→
00:06:38,087
The
00:06:38,192
→
00:06:40,732
MPs puked, and then they came back with
00:06:40,732
→
00:06:41,892
something less.
00:06:42,087
→
00:06:43,047
with winter fuel, they
00:06:43,047
→
00:06:43,357
tried
00:06:43,402
→
00:06:43,722
and didn't try.
00:06:44,222
→
00:06:46,072
Shabana Mahmood's reforms
00:06:46,072
→
00:06:47,272
to indefinitely to remain.
00:06:48,002
→
00:06:48,652
V- very
00:06:48,652
→
00:06:50,382
hard thing to get past Labour
00:06:51,012
→
00:06:51,582
MPs
00:06:51,582
→
00:06:51,662
who
00:06:51,677
→
00:06:52,157
don't want
00:06:52,252
→
00:06:52,862
vote to be m-
00:06:52,912
→
00:06:54,022
meaner to immigrants.
00:06:54,412
→
00:06:55,672
But you'd have to say, this is it.
00:06:55,712
→
00:06:57,062
I'm staking-- we all got
00:06:57,062
→
00:06:58,032
elected on this manifesto.
00:06:58,032
→
00:06:58,412
You're gonna have to
00:06:58,447
→
00:06:58,797
do it."
00:06:59,402
→
00:07:00,082
and the quote that
00:07:00,082
→
00:07:00,122
I
00:07:00,122
→
00:07:00,292
think
00:07:00,327
→
00:07:01,097
will forever haunt
00:07:01,352
→
00:07:03,422
Starmer is from, Gabriel Progar
00:07:03,422
→
00:07:05,162
and Patrick Maguire's Get In.
00:07:05,782
→
00:07:06,162
hang on a minute.
00:07:06,162
→
00:07:06,702
No, which one is
00:07:06,727
→
00:07:06,847
it?
00:07:07,107
→
00:07:08,247
They've all got in and out titles.
00:07:08,247
→
00:07:08,517
their Get Out?
00:07:08,517
→
00:07:09,737
gentleman's... Yeah.
00:07:09,892
→
00:07:10,162
I saw
00:07:10,198
→
00:07:10,338
Get Out.
00:07:10,477
→
00:07:10,567
Out.
00:07:10,567
→
00:07:10,917
No, it's... No.
00:07:10,917
→
00:07:11,087
didn't
00:07:11,252
→
00:07:11,562
to involve
00:07:11,562
→
00:07:11,972
much Labour
00:07:11,972
→
00:07:12,532
friends.
00:07:13,102
→
00:07:13,292
Yeah.
00:07:13,652
→
00:07:14,022
Jeremy Corbyn
00:07:14,022
→
00:07:14,212
sat
00:07:14,247
→
00:07:14,747
In a chair
00:07:14,747
→
00:07:15,237
and plunged
00:07:15,362
→
00:07:15,422
the,
00:07:15,422
→
00:07:15,742
Underworld.
00:07:16,468
→
00:07:16,608
It
00:07:16,937
→
00:07:17,057
is,
00:07:17,972
→
00:07:18,242
It is,
00:07:18,242
→
00:07:18,642
It's Get
00:07:18,667
→
00:07:19,637
In with the, But,
00:07:20,342
→
00:07:20,642
someone
00:07:20,677
→
00:07:21,017
said it's
00:07:22,292
→
00:07:22,782
the DLR.
00:07:22,782
→
00:07:23,792
It's a driverless train.
00:07:24,492
→
00:07:25,622
No one's driving the train.
00:07:25,712
→
00:07:26,532
and that's what they felt.
00:07:26,532
→
00:07:27,282
They felt that Morgan
00:07:27,282
→
00:07:28,892
McSweeney, his former chief of staff, did have
00:07:28,892
→
00:07:31,632
an idea of what he was doing, but people didn't like it.
00:07:31,892
→
00:07:32,712
Now he's gone.
00:07:32,842
→
00:07:33,062
There's
00:07:33,062
→
00:07:33,482
nothing.
00:07:33,676
→
00:07:33,786
I
00:07:33,801
→
00:07:34,081
I thought the
00:07:34,081
→
00:07:34,301
most
00:07:34,301
→
00:07:35,621
interesting bit of, last
00:07:35,756
→
00:07:38,276
events wasn't actually Wes Streeting going... There, there were also,
00:07:38,311
→
00:07:39,961
before that, there were four junior
00:07:40,366
→
00:07:41,426
who went as well, didn't they?
00:07:41,816
→
00:07:44,846
three of which I must admit I was completely blissfully unaware of
00:07:44,846
→
00:07:46,606
until the point when they sent in their resignation letters.
00:07:46,981
→
00:07:47,491
But one of them was
00:07:47,491
→
00:07:48,351
Jess Phillips, who,
00:07:48,506
→
00:07:48,866
people will
00:07:48,866
→
00:07:48,976
know
00:07:48,976
→
00:07:49,146
about.
00:07:49,146
→
00:07:49,776
I certainly know about.
00:07:50,051
→
00:07:50,671
I thought there was a really
00:07:50,671
→
00:07:51,321
interesting line
00:07:51,526
→
00:07:51,896
Most of the
00:07:51,896
→
00:07:52,446
resignations
00:07:52,636
→
00:07:53,146
letters with that
00:07:53,146
→
00:07:55,136
standard thing of the first paragraph says, "I'm really proud of all
00:07:55,136
→
00:07:55,186
the
00:07:55,186
→
00:07:55,526
stuff I've
00:07:55,526
→
00:07:56,626
achieved in my de- my department.
00:07:56,626
→
00:07:57,366
Here is a list of it,
00:07:58,112
→
00:07:58,482
But we had
00:07:58,482
→
00:07:58,932
disastrous
00:07:59,206
→
00:07:59,276
in
00:07:59,276
→
00:08:00,646
the election, and I think it's time for you to
00:08:00,646
→
00:08:00,876
go.
00:08:00,876
→
00:08:01,226
Sorry."
00:08:02,071
→
00:08:04,031
Jess Phillips was much more in detail about what
00:08:04,136
→
00:08:04,586
thought was wrong
00:08:04,586
→
00:08:05,396
with Keir Starmer.
00:08:05,636
→
00:08:05,931
And
00:08:05,931
→
00:08:07,541
the line I thought was, rather brilliant
00:08:07,541
→
00:08:07,791
line from
00:08:07,846
→
00:08:07,986
she
00:08:08,021
→
00:08:09,581
said, The desire not to have an
00:08:10,096
→
00:08:10,836
means we rarely
00:08:10,836
→
00:08:12,156
make an argument." And it's
00:08:12,156
→
00:08:12,546
that thing you're
00:08:12,546
→
00:08:12,966
talking about.
00:08:12,966
→
00:08:15,216
You don't feel there's a sort of vision there
00:08:15,216
→
00:08:15,496
that he's
00:08:15,496
→
00:08:16,046
pushing through
00:08:16,046
→
00:08:18,766
in the way that, say, strong prime ministers like Tony Blair or Margaret
00:08:18,766
→
00:08:20,816
Thatcher absolutely had their convictions,
00:08:20,816
→
00:08:20,886
and
00:08:20,886
→
00:08:23,946
they were pushing through whether the rest of the party liked it or not.
00:08:23,976
→
00:08:24,016
I
00:08:24,194
→
00:08:24,540
she of course
00:08:24,695
→
00:08:27,887
a minister for, against rather violence against women and
00:08:27,887
→
00:08:28,197
girls.
00:08:29,462
→
00:08:31,762
and she said she, there was a possibility of real changes in
00:08:32,032
→
00:08:32,782
that area, but i-
00:08:32,933
→
00:08:32,983
it
00:08:33,502
→
00:08:33,732
came
00:08:33,807
→
00:08:34,217
threats
00:08:34,242
→
00:08:34,922
made by me
00:08:34,922
→
00:08:35,342
in the light
00:08:35,397
→
00:08:36,527
catastrophic mistakes.
00:08:36,747
→
00:08:36,827
She
00:08:36,827
→
00:08:38,047
was very honest in the letter, and she
00:08:38,112
→
00:08:38,602
said basically
00:08:38,777
→
00:08:39,537
she jumped on the
00:08:39,537
→
00:08:40,197
Mandelson stuff.
00:08:40,197
→
00:08:40,637
Every time that
00:08:40,637
→
00:08:43,177
the Mandelson stuff came up, suddenly the government were very keen to
00:08:43,177
→
00:08:43,387
prove
00:08:43,432
→
00:08:43,892
that they were
00:08:44,027
→
00:08:44,897
the, o- on
00:08:44,897
→
00:08:47,273
the side of doing stuff against, the exploitation of women, and
00:08:47,538
→
00:08:47,758
she
00:08:47,786
→
00:08:48,176
took those
00:08:48,581
→
00:08:49,011
She said, "Yep,
00:08:49,147
→
00:08:49,387
never
00:08:49,396
→
00:08:50,226
want to waste a crisis
00:08:50,226
→
00:08:50,946
to make advancements
00:08:50,946
→
00:08:51,596
for women and girls."
00:08:51,721
→
00:08:53,451
would push things then, and that was the
00:08:53,451
→
00:08:53,811
only way
00:08:53,811
→
00:08:54,481
she found she could
00:08:54,691
→
00:08:54,819
really,
00:08:54,851
→
00:08:55,601
get stuff done.
00:08:55,757
→
00:08:56,397
Wasn't part of
00:08:56,443
→
00:08:57,073
the problem there
00:08:57,073
→
00:08:59,583
was the grooming gangs fiasco was in the background.
00:09:00,237
→
00:09:00,917
And again,
00:09:01,286
→
00:09:01,456
Keir
00:09:01,456
→
00:09:01,996
Starmer
00:09:02,176
→
00:09:02,546
and
00:09:02,866
→
00:09:03,206
his,
00:09:03,660
→
00:09:04,300
operation
00:09:04,560
→
00:09:05,460
were not keen
00:09:05,460
→
00:09:05,570
to
00:09:05,596
→
00:09:08,276
say, We've already had a lot of inquiries."
00:09:08,290
→
00:09:08,480
" Do we
00:09:08,480
→
00:09:09,300
absolutely need
00:09:09,326
→
00:09:10,516
another national inquiry?
00:09:10,876
→
00:09:12,766
This hasn't been ignored and shoved under the
00:09:12,766
→
00:09:13,186
carpet.
00:09:13,450
→
00:09:13,870
This is
00:09:13,896
→
00:09:14,976
a narrative coming from
00:09:14,976
→
00:09:16,536
somewhere else." we covered this
00:09:16,536
→
00:09:18,056
quite extensively in the Eye.
00:09:18,266
→
00:09:19,396
and the idea that,
00:09:19,930
→
00:09:21,110
mainstream journalism from
00:09:21,146
→
00:09:24,316
Andrew Norfolk onward, and then local government and local
00:09:24,316
→
00:09:24,816
inquiries.
00:09:24,950
→
00:09:27,640
I he wasn't keen
00:09:27,856
→
00:09:28,386
to take any
00:09:28,386
→
00:09:29,126
stance on this.
00:09:29,356
→
00:09:31,046
So even the one thing that
00:09:31,046
→
00:09:34,076
Jess Phillips suggested, I would guess, got lost in
00:09:34,076
→
00:09:35,456
the feeling of, "Nope,
00:09:35,826
→
00:09:36,606
we don't want to go there."
00:09:37,200
→
00:09:37,350
Yeah,
00:09:37,350
→
00:09:37,520
I
00:09:37,520
→
00:09:39,830
think that w- with the grooming gangs inquiry, I think there was a, an
00:09:39,830
→
00:09:40,580
argument to be made.
00:09:40,580
→
00:09:43,600
And actually Andrew Norfolk before he died said this, which is you could
00:09:43,600
→
00:09:46,280
just end up spending a lot of money on lawyers' fees and not actually get
00:09:46,280
→
00:09:48,140
any more justice for these victims.
00:09:48,540
→
00:09:50,870
They didn't wanna say that, so it left in this... Labor
00:09:50,905
→
00:09:51,285
MPs were very
00:09:51,690
→
00:09:51,900
about it.
00:09:52,110
→
00:09:52,420
they didn't wanna
00:09:52,420
→
00:09:52,600
go out
00:09:52,635
→
00:09:53,055
and defend
00:09:53,056
→
00:09:53,266
something
00:09:53,266
→
00:09:53,416
that was
00:09:53,530
→
00:09:54,110
change.
00:09:54,530
→
00:09:57,220
look at this with the two-child benefit, cap.
00:09:57,700
→
00:09:58,710
People got suspended.
00:09:58,710
→
00:09:58,960
They got the
00:09:58,985
→
00:09:59,975
Labour whip withdrawn for
00:09:59,980
→
00:10:03,120
policy which is now, a year later, Labor policy.
00:10:03,700
→
00:10:06,430
This is just-- you have to have, even if you're wrong, you have to
00:10:06,430
→
00:10:07,400
tell everyone what you think so
00:10:07,400
→
00:10:08,790
they can be confident deploying
00:10:08,825
→
00:10:09,175
out and
00:10:09,175
→
00:10:09,725
going, and having the
00:10:09,896
→
00:10:11,316
with people in their constituency.
00:10:12,045
→
00:10:12,235
Yeah,
00:10:12,240
→
00:10:12,410
and I
00:10:12,410
→
00:10:12,730
think that
00:10:12,730
→
00:10:15,100
Jess Phillips letter was exactly right about that, I also think the
00:10:15,100
→
00:10:18,190
fact that his panicked, Keir Starmer's panicked response to the local
00:10:18,190
→
00:10:21,390
elections was, "Bring me Gordon Brown and Harriet Harman."
00:10:21,420
→
00:10:21,510
Yes.
00:10:21,580
→
00:10:21,690
That
00:10:21,790
→
00:10:22,340
was the moment, yeah.
00:10:22,340
→
00:10:24,120
Which was, I think everybody in the whole of
00:10:24,125
→
00:10:24,215
of
00:10:24,726
→
00:10:25,906
went What?
00:10:26,273
→
00:10:26,447
It's
00:10:26,472
→
00:10:28,382
really weird with Keir Starmer, though, 'cause there's a combination
00:10:28,467
→
00:10:30,947
that sort of decisive action, but not allies to any sort
00:10:30,947
→
00:10:31,827
of vision, it sometimes seems
00:10:31,862
→
00:10:31,952
like.
00:10:31,952
→
00:10:32,362
So all of those
00:10:32,362
→
00:10:33,172
people were expelled
00:10:33,607
→
00:10:34,337
from the party
00:10:34,377
→
00:10:36,277
or, suspended for kind of six months at a time, I think.
00:10:36,822
→
00:10:37,382
But without any
00:10:37,382
→
00:10:37,682
sort of
00:10:37,887
→
00:10:38,857
to push that through.
00:10:39,192
→
00:10:40,962
when Boris Johnson kicked all of those people out because
00:10:40,962
→
00:10:41,762
they were going against his
00:10:41,762
→
00:10:42,132
Brexit
00:10:42,437
→
00:10:43,467
yeah, it, wasn't
00:10:43,502
→
00:10:45,992
popular with people on the other side, but it was at least a kind
00:10:46,057
→
00:10:46,847
definitive, "This
00:10:46,872
→
00:10:47,462
is what we're doing.
00:10:47,492
→
00:10:47,692
This
00:10:47,777
→
00:10:47,847
the
00:10:47,847
→
00:10:48,207
government's
00:10:48,242
→
00:10:48,662
agenda.
00:10:48,792
→
00:10:49,102
the whole
00:10:49,102
→
00:10:49,352
thing
00:10:49,427
→
00:10:50,947
about getting Brexit through, and that was seen as
00:10:50,972
→
00:10:51,162
a way
00:10:51,217
→
00:10:51,557
doing it.
00:10:51,897
→
00:10:52,057
Whereas
00:10:52,092
→
00:10:52,712
with Keir Starmer, it
00:10:52,712
→
00:10:53,012
just seemed
00:10:53,962
→
00:10:54,312
how
00:10:54,312
→
00:10:54,742
many,
00:10:55,477
→
00:10:55,647
of
00:10:55,647
→
00:10:56,837
your, kind of friends and allies can
00:10:56,837
→
00:10:58,226
you make take the fall for you?
00:10:58,226
→
00:11:01,716
I mean- ...Morgan McSweeney went, Ollie Robbins
00:11:01,716
→
00:11:05,626
went, yeah, there, seemed all sorts of people just seemed to have to fall on
00:11:05,626
→
00:11:09,006
their swords for cockups that, that, that really went all the
00:11:09,006
→
00:11:10,056
way to the top, didn't they?
00:11:10,346
→
00:11:11,166
And it seemed to be odd
00:11:11,263
→
00:11:11,383
that
00:11:11,816
→
00:11:12,706
you bring in two
00:11:13,173
→
00:11:15,423
quite old people from a previous government.
00:11:15,423
→
00:11:16,783
It does suggest to your current
00:11:17,266
→
00:11:18,236
backbenchers-
00:11:18,623
→
00:11:19,923
that none of you are any good.
00:11:19,923
→
00:11:22,293
I've got some jobs going, but you can't have them.
00:11:22,506
→
00:11:23,636
Obviously, I'm going
00:11:23,636
→
00:11:23,876
to give
00:11:23,876
→
00:11:26,726
them to some people who you've already seen
00:11:26,753
→
00:11:27,173
before.
00:11:27,723
→
00:11:28,793
I have to say, most
00:11:28,793
→
00:11:31,943
cartoonists, and indeed nearly everyone on the eye, immediately said,
00:11:32,203
→
00:11:33,583
"Can we have. Peter Madison back?"
00:11:33,583
→
00:11:36,603
'Cause he's another, big figure from those years
00:11:36,701
→
00:11:37,501
be really useful
00:11:37,503
→
00:11:37,633
to
00:11:37,633
→
00:11:37,943
have.
00:11:38,096
→
00:11:38,386
And
00:11:38,953
→
00:11:39,353
again,
00:11:39,353
→
00:11:39,413
I
00:11:39,916
→
00:11:41,786
it, is the fact that Keir can't do
00:11:42,316
→
00:11:42,896
any sort of
00:11:42,933
→
00:11:43,413
management,
00:11:43,980
→
00:11:44,180
which
00:11:44,216
→
00:11:44,356
you know
00:11:44,356
→
00:11:45,636
is a boring thing to point out,
00:11:45,666
→
00:11:46,376
but that,
00:11:46,460
→
00:11:47,710
that clearly is one of the
00:11:47,710
→
00:11:48,610
reasons he
00:11:48,610
→
00:11:50,700
didn't, carry anyone
00:11:50,700
→
00:11:51,090
with him.
00:11:51,585
→
00:11:51,725
It's
00:11:52,010
→
00:11:54,410
odd, something we've talked about ever since the government got in is
00:11:54,410
→
00:11:56,110
the kind of Blairite comfort blanket.
00:11:56,110
→
00:11:56,640
We mentioned
00:11:56,716
→
00:11:58,036
Alan Milburn coming back and
00:11:58,190
→
00:12:01,050
Jonathan Powell, and it's very odd, for Keir Starmer, who doesn't
00:12:01,050
→
00:12:02,130
give any impression of being
00:12:02,170
→
00:12:02,980
deeply steeped
00:12:03,006
→
00:12:03,126
in
00:12:03,126
→
00:12:04,116
labor history, know?
00:12:04,240
→
00:12:05,420
not somebody who kind of swoons
00:12:05,420
→
00:12:05,930
over Clement
00:12:05,930
→
00:12:06,770
Attlee or whatever it might
00:12:06,826
→
00:12:07,026
it might be.
00:12:07,700
→
00:12:09,840
To then have this attachment to
00:12:09,875
→
00:12:10,645
bringing back
00:12:11,286
→
00:12:11,736
Blairite
00:12:11,850
→
00:12:12,220
figures.
00:12:12,250
→
00:12:13,360
Sort of odd, isn't it?
00:12:13,630
→
00:12:13,780
like
00:12:13,865
→
00:12:15,225
reviving, like
00:12:15,225
→
00:12:16,005
Malcolm in the, Middle or
00:12:16,380
→
00:12:17,440
It's just everyone likes
00:12:17,476
→
00:12:17,596
liked
00:12:17,625
→
00:12:18,255
it worked at the time.
00:12:18,255
→
00:12:18,635
Like they've done, yeah.
00:12:18,665
→
00:12:19,945
Yeah, why don't we do this again?
00:12:20,285
→
00:12:21,175
But I wonder how if that
00:12:21,175
→
00:12:21,545
was a,
00:12:21,890
→
00:12:22,180
that was
00:12:22,180
→
00:12:23,310
something that was interesting for Jess.
00:12:23,310
→
00:12:24,070
The other thing she said
00:12:24,070
→
00:12:24,180
in
00:12:24,180
→
00:12:27,840
that letter was "I wanted to put software on everybody's phones that
00:12:27,840
→
00:12:30,290
basically would b- stop children uploading naked pictures of themselves
00:12:30,290
→
00:12:31,170
to the internet." Now, we can have
00:12:31,170
→
00:12:31,740
an argument about
00:12:31,740
→
00:12:33,340
whether or not that's authoritarianism, whatever.
00:12:33,660
→
00:12:35,480
But her way of presenting it was they didn't wanna
00:12:35,480
→
00:12:37,030
have the fight with the tech companies.
00:12:37,570
→
00:12:37,680
And
00:12:37,680
→
00:12:39,230
I think that is a really interesting
00:12:39,230
→
00:12:42,010
thing, is that are you willing to identify villains in
00:12:42,010
→
00:12:42,590
public life?
00:12:42,620
→
00:12:44,330
So Reform have got a very
00:12:44,655
→
00:12:46,045
clear argument about Who they think is
00:12:46,080
→
00:12:46,800
ruining Britain.
00:12:46,860
→
00:12:46,970
Yeah
00:12:47,000
→
00:12:48,560
the Greens have got a very clear argument
00:12:48,560
→
00:12:49,870
about who they think is ruining Britain.
00:12:50,170
→
00:12:52,700
who according to Keir Starmer, is stopping
00:12:52,725
→
00:12:53,085
us being
00:12:53,110
→
00:12:54,860
kind of country he would like us to be?
00:12:55,180
→
00:12:57,540
And I can't, two years in, I can't answer that.
00:12:57,910
→
00:12:58,610
He's come out pretty
00:12:58,635
→
00:12:59,005
strongly
00:12:59,590
→
00:13:01,480
about Reform and, their opinions, and
00:13:01,480
→
00:13:03,820
he's, I think, flirted with actually saying, I
00:13:03,820
→
00:13:04,490
think these people
00:13:04,980
→
00:13:06,730
are, acting in a racist manner, which
00:13:06,730
→
00:13:08,500
is strong prime ministerial language.
00:13:08,660
→
00:13:09,140
But that's
00:13:10,185
→
00:13:10,845
Not enough for You
00:13:11,057
→
00:13:11,647
Being scared of the
00:13:11,757
→
00:13:12,567
tech barons is
00:13:12,597
→
00:13:13,077
a really weird
00:13:13,077
→
00:13:13,237
one,
00:13:13,347
→
00:13:14,667
these guys are not popular.
00:13:14,877
→
00:13:14,977
Yeah.
00:13:15,187
→
00:13:16,077
I know that weirdly Tommy
00:13:16,077
→
00:13:17,007
Robinson on Saturday got
00:13:17,137
→
00:13:17,397
his
00:13:17,427
→
00:13:17,697
crowd to
00:13:17,787
→
00:13:18,877
three cheers for Elon Musk,
00:13:18,937
→
00:13:20,987
but I'm not sure the country at large want to
00:13:20,987
→
00:13:21,137
give
00:13:21,297
→
00:13:22,527
cheers for Elon, Musk.
00:13:22,777
→
00:13:24,317
they, these are quite identifiable
00:13:24,317
→
00:13:25,067
baddies that
00:13:25,577
→
00:13:25,987
that Yeah that
00:13:26,007
→
00:13:26,547
... it might not
00:13:26,587
→
00:13:27,537
hurt him to go up against.
00:13:27,687
→
00:13:27,767
they're
00:13:27,767
→
00:13:28,197
a bit like
00:13:28,197
→
00:13:28,657
sort of water
00:13:28,957
→
00:13:29,377
bosses.
00:13:29,377
→
00:13:29,917
There are a few
00:13:29,917
→
00:13:30,727
obvious villains
00:13:30,727
→
00:13:31,137
out there
00:13:31,447
→
00:13:33,667
who, you could set yourself
00:13:33,667
→
00:13:35,207
against and define yourself that way, I'm sure.
00:13:35,207
→
00:13:35,354
Yeah,
00:13:35,417
→
00:13:36,097
you can see- Andy Burnham
00:13:36,187
→
00:13:36,257
what
00:13:36,257
→
00:13:36,727
he's doing there.
00:13:36,727
→
00:13:39,257
He's come out against, smartphone use in school, and he
00:13:39,287
→
00:13:39,947
came out at the,
00:13:40,057
→
00:13:40,287
maybe
00:13:40,287
→
00:13:41,097
at the weekend or maybe it was an
00:13:41,097
→
00:13:42,057
archive clip, against VAR
00:13:42,057
→
00:13:42,977
in football,
00:13:43,633
→
00:13:43,793
which
00:13:43,857
→
00:13:46,617
just one of those things that is, I think, unites most football fans- ... is
00:13:46,617
→
00:13:49,067
that they hate the idea that you stop a match for six minutes while some
00:13:49,067
→
00:13:50,527
people in a shed look at the clip and
00:13:50,527
→
00:13:51,337
then you start again.
00:13:51,487
→
00:13:51,837
Yeah,
00:13:51,917
→
00:13:53,037
And- Experts, boo.
00:13:53,557
→
00:13:54,147
Sorry.
00:13:54,407
→
00:13:54,827
No, but that
00:13:54,877
→
00:13:55,817
referee was supposed
00:13:55,847
→
00:13:55,937
to
00:13:55,967
→
00:13:57,057
the expert, and he's actually-
00:13:57,547
→
00:13:57,907
there.
00:13:58,137
→
00:14:02,287
Anyway, but the he has identified they're... Who likes
00:14:02,557
→
00:14:03,047
FIFA?
00:14:03,927
→
00:14:04,367
Who likes
00:14:04,367
→
00:14:05,327
the FA, right?
00:14:05,327
→
00:14:05,827
Who likes
00:14:05,827
→
00:14:07,897
faceless corporations that make a load of,
00:14:07,897
→
00:14:08,327
of money out
00:14:08,367
→
00:14:09,247
fans- Yeah
00:14:09,317
→
00:14:11,267
and don't s- you know, FIFA are in the middle of putting,
00:14:11,377
→
00:14:12,437
halftime breaks
00:14:12,437
→
00:14:12,727
into
00:14:12,727
→
00:14:15,817
the World Cup final so they can flog more adverts and make it like the Super Bowl.
00:14:16,157
→
00:14:16,747
These people are
00:14:16,747
→
00:14:18,637
not popular, and if you're a government, you're
00:14:18,667
→
00:14:18,807
you're
00:14:18,807
→
00:14:19,167
allowed
00:14:19,167
→
00:14:19,317
to,
00:14:19,637
→
00:14:20,007
you're allowed
00:14:20,007
→
00:14:20,977
to hop... This comes back
00:14:21,027
→
00:14:22,007
to your Deirdre Barlow
00:14:22,327
→
00:14:22,987
of Tony Blair.
00:14:22,987
→
00:14:23,067
Free-
00:14:24,243
→
00:14:25,933
My Deirdre Bar- Tony Blair.
00:14:26,057
→
00:14:26,117
But
00:14:26,137
→
00:14:27,587
he Suddenly got into Free Deirdre.
00:14:27,627
→
00:14:27,727
You
00:14:27,727
→
00:14:28,697
jump on the bandwagon.
00:14:28,697
→
00:14:28,947
Yes.
00:14:29,127
→
00:14:29,197
Yeah,
00:14:29,197
→
00:14:29,737
yeah, yeah.
00:14:29,737
→
00:14:31,297
This was when she went to prison,
00:14:31,654
→
00:14:32,496
Fictional character, my lad,
00:14:33,323
→
00:14:34,023
in Coronation Street.
00:14:34,053
→
00:14:34,953
Oh, thank for a minute
00:14:35,003
→
00:14:35,423
there, Dave- ... Tony
00:14:35,447
→
00:14:35,577
had
00:14:35,823
→
00:14:37,143
campaigning for someone
00:14:37,167
→
00:14:38,077
the
00:14:38,103
→
00:14:38,413
real
00:14:38,413
→
00:14:38,943
world.
00:14:40,196
→
00:14:40,976
But, she was on
00:14:41,017
→
00:14:41,547
Coronation
00:14:41,936
→
00:14:42,866
There was a storyline,
00:14:42,897
→
00:14:44,087
and Tony Blair shamelessly
00:14:44,356
→
00:14:44,666
onto
00:14:44,697
→
00:14:45,337
And then- Yeah ... it hadn't seemed-
00:14:45,506
→
00:14:46,176
haven't seen- I mean, the
00:14:46,176
→
00:14:46,736
Jas, the Jas Phillips one in
00:14:46,736
→
00:14:47,986
particular seemed because not only
00:14:48,017
→
00:14:48,437
is it going up
00:14:48,437
→
00:14:48,647
against
00:14:48,666
→
00:14:52,306
tech bar- tech barons, but it's also attempting to stop child pornography.
00:14:52,586
→
00:14:53,406
this seems to me this would be
00:14:53,406
→
00:14:54,896
quite a popular move with the public.
00:14:54,896
→
00:14:57,766
There's not- Yeah, there's not a huge pro child pornography lobby out
00:14:57,766
→
00:14:58,596
there in politics that
00:14:58,596
→
00:14:59,266
you're gonna lose a vote to.
00:14:59,266
→
00:14:59,646
there's
00:14:59,646
→
00:14:59,706
is
00:14:59,767
→
00:14:59,797
... a
00:15:00,043
→
00:15:00,143
a big
00:15:00,143
→
00:15:01,223
reform chunk who are
00:15:01,223
→
00:15:03,753
fixated and concentrate
00:15:03,753
→
00:15:04,893
on defending children.
00:15:04,953
→
00:15:05,103
Yeah.
00:15:05,357
→
00:15:05,557
this
00:15:05,557
→
00:15:05,717
is
00:15:05,743
→
00:15:06,523
their agenda.
00:15:06,803
→
00:15:07,123
This was the-
00:15:07,127
→
00:15:07,187
What
00:15:07,187
→
00:15:07,887
about SLAPPs?
00:15:08,147
→
00:15:08,697
You're always telling
00:15:08,737
→
00:15:09,907
SLAPPs would be incredibly
00:15:09,933
→
00:15:11,103
popular for a government
00:15:11,177
→
00:15:11,397
bring
00:15:11,423
→
00:15:11,583
in.
00:15:11,903
→
00:15:12,053
Yeah,
00:15:12,057
→
00:15:12,407
SLAPPs,
00:15:12,407
→
00:15:12,737
which seem to
00:15:12,737
→
00:15:13,357
have completely fallen
00:15:13,357
→
00:15:13,717
by the wayside.
00:15:13,787
→
00:15:14,377
talked about this,
00:15:14,657
→
00:15:16,247
in, in in the last podcast.
00:15:16,397
→
00:15:19,327
so this is strategic lawsuits against public participation, and
00:15:19,327
→
00:15:20,357
there's been a lot of, research
00:15:20,357
→
00:15:22,647
come out for FOI, requests by various people
00:15:22,677
→
00:15:22,837
which
00:15:22,837
→
00:15:23,697
show that the lobbying
00:15:23,703
→
00:15:23,883
by
00:15:23,987
→
00:15:24,567
Society of
00:15:24,567
→
00:15:25,327
Media Lawyers,
00:15:25,327
→
00:15:28,487
our friends at Carter-Ruck and Mishcon de Reya and places like that,
00:15:28,947
→
00:15:30,037
has been very, successful.
00:15:30,197
→
00:15:30,827
it's gone completely
00:15:30,887
→
00:15:31,617
the back burner.
00:15:32,147
→
00:15:33,007
I, again, it's,
00:15:33,967
→
00:15:34,257
greedy
00:15:34,257
→
00:15:34,647
lawyers
00:15:34,647
→
00:15:35,047
and sort
00:15:35,047
→
00:15:36,367
of Russian oligarchs and people
00:15:36,367
→
00:15:37,477
suing journalists.
00:15:38,067
→
00:15:38,217
It
00:15:38,247
→
00:15:38,427
would,
00:15:39,003
→
00:15:39,043
I
00:15:39,047
→
00:15:39,287
think, be
00:15:39,287
→
00:15:40,047
fairly popular with
00:15:40,047
→
00:15:40,097
the
00:15:40,447
→
00:15:41,267
to go up against these people.
00:15:41,267
→
00:15:43,387
It would certainly get the newspaper editors on
00:15:43,387
→
00:15:43,957
side, wouldn't
00:15:43,957
→
00:15:44,037
it?
00:15:44,507
→
00:15:44,567
I
00:15:44,597
→
00:15:45,917
think we would unequivocally
00:15:46,127
→
00:15:46,567
that people
00:15:46,697
→
00:15:47,487
stopping-
00:15:48,381
→
00:15:49,893
here.
00:15:49,937
→
00:15:50,167
Trying
00:15:50,167
→
00:15:50,417
to put
00:15:50,417
→
00:15:50,737
us out
00:15:50,813
→
00:15:51,513
business- Yeah
00:15:51,517
→
00:15:51,677
would,
00:15:52,427
→
00:15:52,717
would go
00:15:52,717
→
00:15:53,047
down quite
00:15:53,077
→
00:15:53,447
well,
00:15:53,827
→
00:15:58,537
But none of these things, I think, clear the public opinion threshold.
00:15:58,607
→
00:16:01,117
I know, I, see what you're saying about SLAPPs, but I don't think-
00:16:01,837
→
00:16:05,077
Most members of the public care too much about slaps in particular.
00:16:05,327
→
00:16:05,797
Sorry.
00:16:05,863
→
00:16:06,178
No, they
00:16:06,437
→
00:16:06,527
though.
00:16:06,527
→
00:16:07,424
But they, I know they should.
00:16:07,527
→
00:16:08,367
I know they should.
00:16:08,767
→
00:16:09,597
But none of these things,
00:16:09,597
→
00:16:10,337
seem to clear
00:16:10,337
→
00:16:11,247
the bar.
00:16:11,247
→
00:16:14,207
It just feel, feels like a slow agglomeration of
00:16:14,207
→
00:16:17,477
irritations that have sapped public support, meaning that eventually
00:16:17,477
→
00:16:18,827
no one's willing to go into bat
00:16:19,428
→
00:16:19,798
for the government.
00:16:20,028
→
00:16:20,598
I, think there's also a
00:16:20,598
→
00:16:20,988
feeling
00:16:20,988
→
00:16:24,438
that, putting, employers' National Insurance up-
00:16:24,687
→
00:16:24,867
Yeah
00:16:24,957
→
00:16:26,167
hasn't helped hugely, and the
00:16:26,167
→
00:16:26,537
figures
00:16:26,568
→
00:16:27,588
are, people are
00:16:27,588
→
00:16:27,798
still
00:16:27,798
→
00:16:28,808
arguing about them, but
00:16:28,887
→
00:16:29,847
not looking terribly
00:16:29,847
→
00:16:30,127
good.
00:16:30,347
→
00:16:30,437
Yeah.
00:16:30,437
→
00:16:32,857
And the economy is, always something that people
00:16:32,888
→
00:16:36,338
will judge you on, and whether it's Keir's fault or not,
00:16:36,898
→
00:16:37,388
he hasn't
00:16:37,827
→
00:16:38,647
sufficiently well that
00:16:38,647
→
00:16:38,747
it
00:16:38,747
→
00:16:39,627
isn't his fault.
00:16:39,977
→
00:16:40,107
If
00:16:40,138
→
00:16:40,438
it's the
00:16:40,438
→
00:16:41,068
fault of,
00:16:41,947
→
00:16:42,467
hangover
00:16:42,498
→
00:16:45,708
from, Russia/Ukraine plus, the next
00:16:45,708
→
00:16:46,418
war in the middle
00:16:46,418
→
00:16:47,468
of, plus,
00:16:47,948
→
00:16:51,528
the, financial crisis, which is still going on, and
00:16:51,738
→
00:16:53,108
dare I say it, Brexit, and
00:16:53,147
→
00:16:53,547
figures are
00:16:53,547
→
00:16:55,757
still suggesting GDP went
00:16:55,798
→
00:16:56,208
down,
00:16:56,438
→
00:16:58,398
4% and everybody's lost out.
00:16:58,928
→
00:17:00,098
You've got to make that case.
00:17:00,568
→
00:17:03,098
If you're in the middle of an economic crisis, you can't just say, "Oh,
00:17:04,927
→
00:17:05,837
it's miserable, isn't it?
00:17:05,868
→
00:17:06,938
And I look miserable."
00:17:07,447
→
00:17:07,557
You
00:17:07,557
→
00:17:07,697
do,
00:17:07,697
→
00:17:07,917
have
00:17:07,948
→
00:17:08,368
to say
00:17:08,397
→
00:17:08,737
why.
00:17:09,368
→
00:17:09,498
And
00:17:09,717
→
00:17:11,297
the case for the unpopular bits as well.
00:17:11,437
→
00:17:12,477
that was the thing with Mrs. Thatcher.
00:17:12,477
→
00:17:12,597
She
00:17:12,637
→
00:17:13,117
was prepared
00:17:13,147
→
00:17:16,037
say, unemployment sadly is the price we're gonna have to pay," which
00:17:16,077
→
00:17:17,557
was a very, unpopular thing
00:17:17,607
→
00:17:17,887
say,
00:17:17,957
→
00:17:18,997
but it felt at least that
00:17:19,457
→
00:17:20,447
there was a sort of vision
00:17:20,517
→
00:17:20,997
a reasoning
00:17:20,997
→
00:17:21,347
behind it?
00:17:21,397
→
00:17:21,747
Whereas I
00:17:21,747
→
00:17:22,097
feel
00:17:22,567
→
00:17:22,637
the
00:17:22,637
→
00:17:23,077
public at the
00:17:23,077
→
00:17:23,837
moment are just feeling
00:17:23,867
→
00:17:24,047
like
00:17:24,527
→
00:17:24,577
the
00:17:24,577
→
00:17:25,327
economy and everything, is
00:17:25,327
→
00:17:27,047
just drifting and
00:17:27,547
→
00:17:27,997
no one is
00:17:28,187
→
00:17:28,537
taking
00:17:28,957
→
00:17:29,497
any, charge
00:17:29,518
→
00:17:29,948
of anything.
00:17:30,444
→
00:17:30,564
Now,
00:17:30,594
→
00:17:31,134
the other case
00:17:31,214
→
00:17:31,434
people
00:17:31,434
→
00:17:32,034
make is
00:17:32,034
→
00:17:33,924
that, Keir Starmer just
00:17:33,924
→
00:17:34,264
doesn't look
00:17:34,264
→
00:17:35,314
like he's having fun.
00:17:35,634
→
00:17:36,504
And it's easy to
00:17:36,504
→
00:17:36,694
see
00:17:36,694
→
00:17:38,484
why you would not look like you're having fun
00:17:38,484
→
00:17:38,734
because
00:17:38,774
→
00:17:39,074
it's...
00:17:39,644
→
00:17:43,044
most people have not seemed like they're having fun in this job, frankly.
00:17:43,044
→
00:17:43,374
Theresa
00:17:43,415
→
00:17:44,025
May did that little
00:17:44,217
→
00:17:44,625
dance, didn't she?
00:17:44,625
→
00:17:44,835
Oh, you're right.
00:17:44,835
→
00:17:45,365
She was having fun
00:17:45,365
→
00:17:45,465
then.
00:17:45,465
→
00:17:46,105
She was away on that time.
00:17:46,105
→
00:17:46,675
that was her happy place.
00:17:46,675
→
00:17:47,155
Boris Johnson
00:17:47,304
→
00:17:47,884
was her happy place.
00:17:47,914
→
00:17:50,644
Boris Johnson seemed to be having an absolute ball, but I don't- Yeah, none of
00:17:50,694
→
00:17:51,114
the
00:17:51,114
→
00:17:51,304
rest
00:17:51,304
→
00:17:51,344
of
00:17:51,344
→
00:17:51,474
us were.
00:17:51,474
→
00:17:51,534
No,
00:17:51,534
→
00:17:51,774
exactly.
00:17:51,795
→
00:17:51,934
So-
00:17:51,934
→
00:17:52,054
Even
00:17:52,054
→
00:17:52,174
Rishi
00:17:52,174
→
00:17:55,084
Sunak looked like he was doing u- useful and important work.
00:17:55,174
→
00:17:55,614
Do you think?
00:17:55,804
→
00:17:56,964
when he got to have his AI
00:17:56,964
→
00:17:58,954
summit, he s- was absolutely thrilled.
00:17:59,154
→
00:17:59,864
That was his- That
00:17:59,864
→
00:18:00,004
was
00:18:00,004
→
00:18:00,324
his high
00:18:00,324
→
00:18:00,594
point.
00:18:00,594
→
00:18:00,634
That
00:18:00,634
→
00:18:00,735
was
00:18:00,806
→
00:18:00,946
his
00:18:00,955
→
00:18:01,055
thing.
00:18:01,055
→
00:18:01,205
And
00:18:01,336
→
00:18:01,576
off, wasn't it?
00:18:01,576
→
00:18:01,656
And
00:18:01,664
→
00:18:01,944
chess-
00:18:02,005
→
00:18:02,175
chessboards
00:18:02,204
→
00:18:02,754
in parks
00:18:02,754
→
00:18:04,344
and con- And maths A-levels,
00:18:04,446
→
00:18:05,226
that made him very happy.
00:18:05,234
→
00:18:06,884
100 chess boards in parks.
00:18:07,064
→
00:18:08,084
But no pieces.
00:18:08,230
→
00:18:08,640
Bring your own
00:18:09,344
→
00:18:09,594
Bring your
00:18:09,594
→
00:18:09,734
own
00:18:09,734
→
00:18:09,962
pieces.
00:18:10,194
→
00:18:10,804
Anyway,
00:18:11,004
→
00:18:11,604
God, that's
00:18:11,606
→
00:18:15,486
And when he tried to u- buy a can of Coke ...and meet members of the public.
00:18:15,486
→
00:18:15,536
And
00:18:15,614
→
00:18:15,644
Oh,
00:18:15,864
→
00:18:15,924
yeah.
00:18:15,924
→
00:18:16,164
And he didn't have
00:18:16,164
→
00:18:16,294
any
00:18:16,326
→
00:18:16,436
get
00:18:16,436
→
00:18:16,596
That
00:18:16,596
→
00:18:17,256
was quite good.
00:18:17,256
→
00:18:17,316
He
00:18:17,654
→
00:18:18,034
up someone
00:18:18,034
→
00:18:18,494
else's car with
00:18:18,494
→
00:18:18,834
petrol,
00:18:18,834
→
00:18:19,134
didn't he?
00:18:19,335
→
00:18:20,515
Oh, we're feeling wistful about Rishi
00:18:20,515
→
00:18:20,945
Sunak now.
00:18:20,995
→
00:18:21,455
Yeah.
00:18:21,526
→
00:18:22,296
is what happens,
00:18:22,626
→
00:18:22,856
There's always-
00:18:22,856
→
00:18:23,226
a nostalgia.
00:18:23,226
→
00:18:23,826
The nostalgia.
00:18:23,826
→
00:18:24,096
kicks in.
00:18:24,096
→
00:18:24,196
Okay.
00:18:24,456
→
00:18:24,856
But you're
00:18:24,865
→
00:18:25,085
right.
00:18:25,454
→
00:18:26,134
there is a trope
00:18:26,134
→
00:18:26,224
in
00:18:26,224
→
00:18:28,444
politics that's called the happy warrior, Which is
00:18:28,444
→
00:18:30,324
basically someone who gets out of bed every morning and they
00:18:30,356
→
00:18:30,766
go, and they
00:18:30,766
→
00:18:31,046
argue
00:18:31,174
→
00:18:31,514
people.
00:18:31,754
→
00:18:31,844
And
00:18:31,885
→
00:18:33,385
actually it works in journalism too.
00:18:33,704
→
00:18:34,154
lots of these
00:18:34,154
→
00:18:36,014
YouTube creators, they just love having a ruck.
00:18:36,014
→
00:18:38,124
They get up... r- I... The thought for me of
00:18:38,124
→
00:18:40,894
being invited on some show to argue the toss with somebody makes, fills
00:18:40,894
→
00:18:42,444
my heart with dread these days.
00:18:42,664
→
00:18:42,874
some
00:18:42,874
→
00:18:45,454
people love it, They get out and they, absolutely thrive on it.
00:18:45,834
→
00:18:46,254
And actually,
00:18:46,285
→
00:18:47,615
in today's attention economy, you've
00:18:47,615
→
00:18:47,965
gotta be
00:18:48,724
→
00:18:50,064
out stuff all the time.
00:18:50,104
→
00:18:52,114
You've gotta seem like you're really up for a ruck.
00:18:52,154
→
00:18:52,564
And this is a
00:18:52,564
→
00:18:55,474
thing that Nigel Farage And Zak Polanski are both constantly doing.
00:18:55,944
→
00:18:56,044
They're,
00:18:56,044
→
00:18:56,544
almost
00:18:56,894
→
00:18:57,844
n- they're almost never
00:18:57,844
→
00:19:00,164
not making a TikTok, as far as I can tell.
00:19:00,164
→
00:19:00,304
They're
00:19:00,304
→
00:19:00,414
just-
00:19:00,414
→
00:19:00,604
They're like
00:19:00,604
→
00:19:01,844
95th percentile- Yeah
00:19:01,844
→
00:19:02,564
... extroverts.
00:19:02,615
→
00:19:02,735
They
00:19:02,914
→
00:19:03,404
their energy
00:19:03,404
→
00:19:03,644
Yeah ...from
00:19:03,644
→
00:19:04,474
being in company.
00:19:04,474
→
00:19:04,994
Now, Nigel
00:19:04,994
→
00:19:05,694
Farage in the
00:19:05,984
→
00:19:06,874
Reform podcast,
00:19:06,916
→
00:19:07,106
which I
00:19:07,204
→
00:19:07,564
be the only
00:19:07,564
→
00:19:09,904
listener to, he has got so many
00:19:09,904
→
00:19:11,024
people waiting to see him on
00:19:11,024
→
00:19:12,264
stage, and there's an overflow room.
00:19:12,424
→
00:19:12,964
So he goes
00:19:12,964
→
00:19:13,134
and
00:19:13,134
→
00:19:15,294
does an hour of Q&A in the overflow
00:19:15,294
→
00:19:16,024
room beforehand.
00:19:16,404
→
00:19:17,204
that is, for him
00:19:17,204
→
00:19:17,364
that
00:19:17,395
→
00:19:18,555
is politics, is people
00:19:18,834
→
00:19:20,944
questions, him shooting the breeze with them.
00:19:21,154
→
00:19:22,254
You get that same vibe
00:19:22,254
→
00:19:23,094
off Zak Polanski.
00:19:23,252
→
00:19:23,332
the
00:19:23,332
→
00:19:25,582
Q&A sessions don't involve the
00:19:25,582
→
00:19:28,172
question- why did you take that money?
00:19:29,160
→
00:19:29,510
and why
00:19:29,730
→
00:19:29,850
you
00:19:29,892
→
00:19:30,572
declare it?
00:19:30,572
→
00:19:32,472
I... He seems less keen to answer that one.
00:19:32,592
→
00:19:32,682
Yeah.
00:19:32,682
→
00:19:32,852
that
00:19:32,882
→
00:19:33,202
ruck
00:19:33,202
→
00:19:33,812
is not one
00:19:33,920
→
00:19:34,180
having.
00:19:34,180
→
00:19:34,240
No.
00:19:34,290
→
00:19:34,460
But
00:19:34,460
→
00:19:34,720
that
00:19:34,800
→
00:19:35,980
that was also the case with Jeremy
00:19:36,330
→
00:19:36,940
Jeremy Corbyn
00:19:36,980
→
00:19:39,900
loved being asked, "When will the socialist paradise come? How
00:19:39,900
→
00:19:41,360
Can I hear more about your jam?"
00:19:41,670
→
00:19:44,220
And rather less about, "Do you think we should pull out of NATO
00:19:44,220
→
00:19:45,430
then, like you always used to say?"
00:19:45,580
→
00:19:46,530
Can I... finish, can I
00:19:46,530
→
00:19:47,200
finish?
00:19:47,360
→
00:19:48,000
Can I finish?
00:19:48,492
→
00:19:48,712
Yeah, All
00:19:48,712
→
00:19:49,162
right, love.
00:19:49,282
→
00:19:50,202
All right,
00:19:50,370
→
00:19:50,480
down.
00:19:50,920
→
00:19:51,150
Now,
00:19:51,727
→
00:19:52,037
Let's turn
00:19:52,037
→
00:19:53,137
to someone who does seem like they
00:19:53,326
→
00:19:53,846
enjoy public
00:19:53,846
→
00:19:53,943
life,
00:19:54,056
→
00:19:54,416
who's Andy
00:19:54,416
→
00:19:54,816
Burnham.
00:19:55,084
→
00:19:56,924
Yeah, for some of us, this is,
00:19:56,933
→
00:20:00,593
the whole episode is bringing back me- memories of the long 2010s-
00:20:01,054
→
00:20:01,954
when Andy Burnham
00:20:02,343
→
00:20:03,793
on the periphery of, of my
00:20:03,793
→
00:20:05,183
vision for all of that, time.
00:20:05,523
→
00:20:09,163
Actually, I was on a I was on a panel with him in Labour Party conference in 2021.
00:20:09,163
→
00:20:09,533
God, I'm
00:20:09,533
→
00:20:10,493
getting nostalgic for Labour
00:20:10,624
→
00:20:11,784
Party conferences past.
00:20:11,784
→
00:20:13,664
This is worse than nostalgia for Rishi Sunak.
00:20:14,593
→
00:20:18,443
he is, he has enjoyed being m- mayor of Manchester.
00:20:18,793
→
00:20:21,483
I think people generally find the mayoralties to be the right
00:20:21,483
→
00:20:22,873
size of job, where you can
00:20:22,873
→
00:20:26,413
actually do things, and people see them in their everyday lives in a
00:20:26,413
→
00:20:29,403
way that at prime ministerial level has become much more a struggle.
00:20:29,443
→
00:20:31,303
S- Sadiq Khan has been, what?
00:20:31,303
→
00:20:32,813
He's in his third term as mayor of London now.
00:20:32,813
→
00:20:35,073
He's majored on, mostly on clean air
00:20:35,363
→
00:20:37,753
and, things like that, and he's, he's written books about it.
00:20:37,753
→
00:20:41,323
He's And that's something he really likes talking about and going into bat for.
00:20:41,413
→
00:20:43,183
And Ulez is another example of it.
00:20:43,433
→
00:20:43,693
And if it- And he
00:20:43,694
→
00:20:44,304
he loves doing,
00:20:44,484
→
00:20:45,514
cross-religious stuff.
00:20:45,643
→
00:20:46,273
That man has been to a
00:20:46,275
→
00:20:46,525
a lot
00:20:46,533
→
00:20:47,063
synagogues.
00:20:47,253
→
00:20:47,623
Can't, you
00:20:47,674
→
00:20:47,734
him
00:20:47,893
→
00:20:48,203
keep him out.
00:20:48,203
→
00:20:48,333
Okay.
00:20:48,483
→
00:20:51,373
But, he, sees the ambassadorial role of being, London's
00:20:51,373
→
00:20:52,833
voice as Well, yeah- as being really important.
00:20:53,154
→
00:20:53,694
And again, does
00:20:53,705
→
00:20:54,995
seem to be enjoying
00:20:55,053
→
00:20:55,313
more.
00:20:55,603
→
00:21:00,003
But yeah, so Andy Burnham's path to glory is, there's a selection
00:21:00,003
→
00:21:01,273
meeting at the NEC this week.
00:21:01,273
→
00:21:02,823
Technically, Starmer has got
00:21:02,853
→
00:21:04,183
the votes on the NEC
00:21:04,183
→
00:21:07,413
to block it, but I think there would be an actual riot if he did.
00:21:07,829
→
00:21:07,929
Okay.
00:21:08,993
→
00:21:10,553
candidate selection, again,
00:21:11,579
→
00:21:11,909
quite
00:21:11,933
→
00:21:14,713
brave person than the rest of Labour to run against him for that
00:21:14,713
→
00:21:16,003
selection, so we'll see how that goes.
00:21:16,423
→
00:21:19,943
But then, then he's got to, a, really difficult challenge to win
00:21:19,943
→
00:21:20,573
that seat.
00:21:21,043
→
00:21:22,123
His chances are looking pretty good.
00:21:22,363
→
00:21:26,673
But the, specific, so it's Makerfield on the outskirts of Wigan, and it
00:21:26,673
→
00:21:30,883
just returned all Reform councilors in the latest group of local elections.
00:21:30,883
→
00:21:30,973
So
00:21:30,973
→
00:21:32,743
why do you think his chances look pretty good then?
00:21:32,843
→
00:21:35,363
Because he is popular in that area.
00:21:36,253
→
00:21:38,223
he's got incredibly good public profile.
00:21:38,443
→
00:21:41,743
Who are Reform gonna run that's gonna have an equivalent profile to
00:21:41,743
→
00:21:41,973
him?
00:21:42,003
→
00:21:42,583
Matt Goodwin
00:21:42,583
→
00:21:42,853
lastly.
00:21:42,853
→
00:21:43,053
It could be
00:21:43,114
→
00:21:44,494
good Matt Win.
00:21:44,524
→
00:21:44,964
Matt Goodwin.
00:21:44,964
→
00:21:45,084
in
00:21:45,093
→
00:21:45,503
beard.
00:21:45,564
→
00:21:46,114
be Good Matt Win.
00:21:46,114
→
00:21:46,744
Matt Goodwin in a beard.
00:21:46,893
→
00:21:47,053
but
00:21:47,963
→
00:21:51,443
if Reform could find somebody with his popularity and name recognition.
00:21:51,783
→
00:21:53,283
And the other thing is it's a by-election.
00:21:53,283
→
00:21:54,303
It's not the general election.
00:21:54,333
→
00:21:58,033
Reform's voter base is more people who left school at 18, more
00:21:58,033
→
00:21:59,163
low information voters, people
00:21:59,163
→
00:21:59,223
who
00:21:59,223
→
00:22:00,843
aren't massively engaged by politics.
00:22:01,173
→
00:22:01,933
Those people don't
00:22:01,933
→
00:22:04,423
tend to turn out in by-elections in the way
00:22:04,423
→
00:22:06,923
that college gr- college graduates, I'm so American.
00:22:07,203
→
00:22:10,613
University graduates- ...people who read a newspaper consistently,
00:22:11,024
→
00:22:11,474
all those
00:22:11,474
→
00:22:11,714
kind of
00:22:11,720
→
00:22:12,030
people
00:22:12,643
→
00:22:15,173
are much more likely... like the f- the conditions in a by-election are
00:22:15,180
→
00:22:16,310
are more favorable to Labour.
00:22:16,340
→
00:22:16,460
But
00:22:16,550
→
00:22:18,540
they said that about local elections, didn't they?
00:22:18,540
→
00:22:20,550
And then a lot of Reform voters did
00:22:20,550
→
00:22:21,080
turn up this
00:22:21,080
→
00:22:21,170
time.
00:22:21,170
→
00:22:21,460
Yeah.
00:22:21,784
→
00:22:22,764
it might just be that they're people...
00:22:23,303
→
00:22:27,653
my, main fear for Andy Burnham in this is what I think of as the Boaty McBoatface
00:22:28,333
→
00:22:30,123
problem, which is I think there might
00:22:30,164
→
00:22:30,484
be a lot
00:22:30,513
→
00:22:32,303
people... who think, "You really want
00:22:32,344
→
00:22:32,444
to
00:22:32,533
→
00:22:33,093
prime minister.
00:22:33,093
→
00:22:35,443
This is essentially a by-election to be prime minister."
00:22:35,474
→
00:22:35,684
Yeah.
00:22:35,864
→
00:22:36,204
"Wouldn't it
00:22:36,253
→
00:22:37,573
funny if we just voted
00:22:37,573
→
00:22:40,073
against you and stopped you?" Much like voting
00:22:40,073
→
00:22:41,623
for the, a ship to be named
00:22:41,640
→
00:22:42,590
Boaty McBoatface.
00:22:42,623
→
00:22:43,413
That's the banter
00:22:43,810
→
00:22:44,000
outcome.
00:22:44,030
→
00:22:44,090
But-
00:22:44,104
→
00:22:44,584
There is a
00:22:44,963
→
00:22:45,433
isn't there, of
00:22:45,433
→
00:22:45,993
people not, lo-
00:22:45,993
→
00:22:48,643
of people in constituencies not liking being used
00:22:48,643
→
00:22:49,043
this way.
00:22:49,363
→
00:22:51,353
there was the Leyton by-election in '64 when
00:22:51,563
→
00:22:51,943
Harold Wilson
00:22:51,943
→
00:22:52,383
was trying to get
00:22:52,383
→
00:22:52,873
someone in.
00:22:53,543
→
00:22:53,988
You're
00:22:54,270
→
00:22:54,890
laughing at me.
00:22:54,950
→
00:22:55,440
Oh, yeah.
00:22:55,440
→
00:22:56,090
No, Leyton, '64.
00:22:56,120
→
00:22:56,210
Yeah, '64.
00:22:56,444
→
00:22:56,794
'64. Yeah.
00:22:56,853
→
00:22:57,143
I was,
00:22:57,143
→
00:22:57,823
thinking it was '63,
00:22:57,864
→
00:22:58,864
' 63, but it's '64.
00:22:59,044
→
00:22:59,124
yeah.
00:22:59,124
→
00:23:00,384
With my Professor Sir John Curtice
00:23:00,573
→
00:23:00,663
on-
00:23:00,804
→
00:23:01,804
... ' 64,
00:23:01,810
→
00:23:02,330
Harold Wilson
00:23:02,334
→
00:23:03,304
tried to parachute in
00:23:03,653
→
00:23:05,213
a a someone who he wanted to make
00:23:05,213
→
00:23:05,333
his
00:23:05,364
→
00:23:06,044
foreign secretary.
00:23:06,164
→
00:23:06,764
And the voters just
00:23:06,764
→
00:23:07,614
kind of went, "No, we're not having
00:23:07,733
→
00:23:08,193
We're not doing that
00:23:08,234
→
00:23:08,354
at
00:23:08,354
→
00:23:08,434
all."
00:23:08,523
→
00:23:09,003
And then fo-
00:23:09,354
→
00:23:09,584
all Right.
00:23:09,584
→
00:23:10,574
this is one you have heard of.
00:23:10,699
→
00:23:10,739
of.
00:23:11,623
→
00:23:12,453
same year, I think.
00:23:13,323
→
00:23:17,973
when, Alec Douglas-Home was, appointed as head of the, as leader
00:23:18,014
→
00:23:18,114
of.
00:23:18,143
→
00:23:19,663
Conservative Party without a seat in Parliament.
00:23:19,663
→
00:23:19,993
Ah, yeah.
00:23:20,054
→
00:23:20,124
yeah.
00:23:20,124
→
00:23:20,254
He was
00:23:20,713
→
00:23:23,353
into a seat up in Scotland, And famously Private Eye put
00:23:23,384
→
00:23:24,164
up a candidate against
00:23:24,233
→
00:23:25,283
for exactly this reason,
00:23:25,604
→
00:23:26,304
' cause they objected to
00:23:26,343
→
00:23:28,933
some sort of coronation, and, Willie Rushton ran against
00:23:28,933
→
00:23:29,123
him.
00:23:29,263
→
00:23:29,343
He
00:23:29,390
→
00:23:30,930
didn't get a huge number of votes.
00:23:30,930
→
00:23:31,810
He is still trying.
00:23:31,810
→
00:23:32,810
37 votes, so it wasn't-
00:23:32,814
→
00:23:33,834
brilliantly successful.
00:23:33,834
→
00:23:34,224
37. But- Okay.
00:23:34,224
→
00:23:35,924
But it does tell you something about the kind of mood
00:23:36,870
→
00:23:37,290
on, on,
00:23:37,290
→
00:23:37,670
occasions
00:23:37,674
→
00:23:38,344
when people feel that
00:23:38,553
→
00:23:39,843
people are being parachuted in like that.
00:23:40,045
→
00:23:41,285
One last solution.
00:23:41,285
→
00:23:43,255
Surely Farage resigns his Clacton
00:23:43,255
→
00:23:44,665
seat, stands in this by-election.
00:23:44,865
→
00:23:45,145
Whoever
00:23:45,145
→
00:23:46,355
wins becomes PM.
00:23:46,645
→
00:23:47,075
Easy.
00:23:47,175
→
00:23:47,295
And
00:23:47,295
→
00:23:47,655
then Josh
00:23:47,761
→
00:23:48,555
Simons could take over
00:23:48,555
→
00:23:49,115
in Clacton,
00:23:49,165
→
00:23:49,405
couldn't he?
00:23:49,405
→
00:23:51,115
They could all just musical chairs all around the country.
00:23:51,213
→
00:23:51,553
would- That's a
00:23:51,553
→
00:23:51,733
good
00:23:51,733
→
00:23:52,233
idea,
00:23:52,233
→
00:23:52,703
except
00:23:52,703
→
00:23:54,103
that it's the first time
00:23:54,133
→
00:23:55,453
Farage won in a by-election.
00:23:55,453
→
00:23:56,623
I do not think
00:23:56,683
→
00:23:57,283
- Yeah ... he's going
00:23:57,283
→
00:23:58,513
to give up Clacton,
00:23:59,007
→
00:23:59,637
" easily.
00:23:59,707
→
00:24:00,017
Who's gonna
00:24:00,067
→
00:24:01,037
buy him a house in,
00:24:01,567
→
00:24:01,847
Macces-
00:24:01,947
→
00:24:02,497
Macclesfield?
00:24:03,077
→
00:24:03,527
Macclesfield?
00:24:03,677
→
00:24:04,087
partner.
00:24:04,177
→
00:24:04,287
His
00:24:04,607
→
00:24:05,237
with her family money.
00:24:05,237
→
00:24:05,897
Oh, that's so true.
00:24:05,967
→
00:24:06,027
Yeah.
00:24:06,027
→
00:24:06,197
That's a
00:24:06,197
→
00:24:06,497
good point.
00:24:06,497
→
00:24:08,017
He probably won't need a donation he
00:24:08,043
→
00:24:08,503
doesn't declare.
00:24:08,793
→
00:24:09,043
aren't
00:24:09,043
→
00:24:09,833
there canals there?
00:24:09,833
→
00:24:10,443
Could he live on a
00:24:10,443
→
00:24:10,713
boat
00:24:10,777
→
00:24:11,037
for
00:24:11,407
→
00:24:11,807
boat?
00:24:12,027
→
00:24:12,117
bit?
00:24:12,403
→
00:24:12,523
a bit?
00:24:13,403
→
00:24:13,783
Can I just
00:24:13,783
→
00:24:14,743
bu- the last point I'd
00:24:14,973
→
00:24:15,173
said
00:24:15,173
→
00:24:15,733
is, when
00:24:15,737
→
00:24:16,407
I read these
00:24:16,553
→
00:24:18,063
resignation letters, all of
00:24:18,063
→
00:24:18,213
them
00:24:18,213
→
00:24:19,573
say, I did a
00:24:19,573
→
00:24:20,463
fantastic job
00:24:20,463
→
00:24:21,513
as Manchester mayor.
00:24:21,803
→
00:24:22,833
I did a fantastic
00:24:22,833
→
00:24:26,353
job as health secretary." I think, why don't you just stay there-
00:24:26,473
→
00:24:26,723
then
00:24:27,273
→
00:24:27,413
and
00:24:27,417
→
00:24:27,637
then you
00:24:27,637
→
00:24:28,117
can all do
00:24:28,227
→
00:24:28,607
brilliant
00:24:28,607
→
00:24:29,337
job, and we could
00:24:29,337
→
00:24:29,697
carry
00:24:29,733
→
00:24:29,993
on.
00:24:30,399
→
00:24:30,599
That's
00:24:30,603
→
00:24:31,713
what I've been trying to say.
00:24:31,932
→
00:24:32,852
Because it's the only time
00:24:32,893
→
00:24:33,553
that anyone is ever
00:24:33,553
→
00:24:34,153
going to listen
00:24:34,262
→
00:24:36,072
you talk about how hard it's been and how
00:24:36,129
→
00:24:37,289
you've done- in your job without
00:24:37,892
→
00:24:38,152
right?
00:24:38,152
→
00:24:40,552
You just have to go, "I tried very hard and I won the 50 meters
00:24:40,552
→
00:24:42,082
swimming medal," and no one cared.
00:24:42,252
→
00:24:45,652
I'm gonna write a letter resigning as host of Page 94, but saying I've driven us
00:24:45,652
→
00:24:47,632
to new metrics and new global audiences.
00:24:47,632
→
00:24:48,332
Yeah, I'm excited.
00:24:48,332
→
00:24:48,622
Okay.
00:24:49,302
→
00:24:49,562
Great.
00:24:50,032
→
00:24:50,402
can you do that
00:24:50,523
→
00:24:50,803
after
00:24:50,803
→
00:24:50,963
this
00:24:51,252
→
00:24:51,432
Yeah, all
00:24:51,433
→
00:24:51,523
will.
00:24:51,523
→
00:24:51,613
'Cause
00:24:51,613
→
00:24:52,233
I've spent time writing
00:24:52,233
→
00:24:52,593
this.
00:24:52,803
→
00:24:52,893
Yes.
00:24:53,372
→
00:24:53,872
we come now
00:24:53,872
→
00:24:54,962
to the quiz.
00:24:55,072
→
00:24:55,422
Helen, give
00:24:55,463
→
00:24:55,823
us the name of
00:24:55,823
→
00:24:56,243
the quiz.
00:24:56,473
→
00:24:56,713
Okay.
00:24:56,713
→
00:24:57,063
Th- You
00:24:57,063
→
00:24:58,233
wrote, this is like
00:24:58,282
→
00:24:58,882
resignation.
00:24:58,912
→
00:24:59,692
I was writing the things
00:24:59,733
→
00:25:01,403
I was... proud of was writing the name of this quiz.
00:25:01,513
→
00:25:01,963
Faction
00:25:01,963
→
00:25:02,553
or Fiction.
00:25:02,652
→
00:25:03,152
Oh.
00:25:03,152
→
00:25:03,182
Hey.
00:25:03,182
→
00:25:03,576
Thank
00:25:03,752
→
00:25:03,792
you
00:25:03,792
→
00:25:03,912
Very
00:25:03,952
→
00:25:04,152
much.
00:25:04,152
→
00:25:04,952
It is, of course, about
00:25:04,952
→
00:25:05,012
the
00:25:05,262
→
00:25:05,492
people
00:25:05,539
→
00:25:06,299
vying for the Labour
00:25:06,299
→
00:25:06,739
leadership-
00:25:06,852
→
00:25:08,732
past candidates for the Labour leadership.
00:25:08,802
→
00:25:09,152
Okay.
00:25:09,992
→
00:25:12,922
With what hashtag did Angela Rayner announce that she'd become a
00:25:12,922
→
00:25:13,712
a grandmother
00:25:13,867
→
00:25:14,012
at the
00:25:14,172
→
00:25:14,982
of 37?
00:25:15,990
→
00:25:16,610
Agrandgela.
00:25:16,949
→
00:25:17,529
Very good.
00:25:17,610
→
00:25:17,640
Hey.
00:25:17,640
→
00:25:18,760
Very good.
00:25:19,260
→
00:25:22,010
in 2015, Andy Burnham wore a T-shirt
00:25:22,050
→
00:25:22,980
declaring that he had never
00:25:22,980
→
00:25:23,990
done what to a
00:25:23,990
→
00:25:24,500
Tory,
00:25:25,069
→
00:25:25,569
Kissed.
00:25:26,369
→
00:25:27,109
Tentatively.
00:25:27,126
→
00:25:27,616
Very
00:25:27,809
→
00:25:28,419
I wrote hopefully.
00:25:28,679
→
00:25:29,259
No, I remember that
00:25:29,259
→
00:25:29,549
phase
00:25:29,559
→
00:25:29,789
people
00:25:29,829
→
00:25:30,699
going around wearing "Never
00:25:30,899
→
00:25:31,669
a Tory" T-shirts.
00:25:31,819
→
00:25:32,519
it is correct.
00:25:33,219
→
00:25:33,669
the update
00:25:33,759
→
00:25:34,699
it was that when the Evening
00:25:34,739
→
00:25:35,449
Standard cornered
00:25:35,659
→
00:25:36,369
at late night
00:25:36,409
→
00:25:38,569
at, Labour Party conference,
00:25:39,039
→
00:25:40,799
he said he had in fact kissed a Tory.
00:25:41,029
→
00:25:41,436
snogging a
00:25:41,496
→
00:25:42,286
Tory, her name was
00:25:42,286
→
00:25:42,896
Octavia, and
00:25:42,966
→
00:25:43,186
went to
00:25:43,186
→
00:25:43,536
Trinity
00:25:43,536
→
00:25:43,976
College.
00:25:44,472
→
00:25:44,882
Oh, I thought you
00:25:44,882
→
00:25:45,292
were gonna say
00:25:45,356
→
00:25:45,626
William
00:25:45,716
→
00:25:46,016
Hague.
00:25:46,016
→
00:25:46,236
If
00:25:48,141
→
00:25:48,411
Which
00:25:48,411
→
00:25:48,501
of
00:25:48,541
→
00:25:49,111
the following
00:25:49,111
→
00:25:49,611
people
00:25:49,731
→
00:25:51,381
has Andy Burnham received fewer
00:25:51,381
→
00:25:51,721
votes
00:25:51,721
→
00:25:52,021
than
00:25:52,391
→
00:25:53,411
in a Labour leadership
00:25:53,411
→
00:25:53,851
election?
00:25:54,581
→
00:26:01,601
A, Ed Miliband, B, David Miliband, C, Ed Balls, or D, Jeremy Corbyn.
00:26:02,017
→
00:26:02,677
It's all of them, isn't it?
00:26:02,677
→
00:26:04,027
It's all of the above, yeah.
00:26:04,027
→
00:26:04,497
you saw
00:26:04,497
→
00:26:05,317
through my ruse.
00:26:05,317
→
00:26:06,267
It's
00:26:06,281
→
00:26:07,591
a trick question, yes.
00:26:07,791
→
00:26:08,071
very good.
00:26:08,071
→
00:26:09,151
in 2010, he
00:26:09,191
→
00:26:09,491
placed
00:26:09,491
→
00:26:10,811
behind both Milibands
00:26:10,871
→
00:26:12,211
and TV favorite
00:26:12,331
→
00:26:12,771
Balls-
00:26:13,191
→
00:26:13,971
... in the first round.
00:26:14,681
→
00:26:15,961
he did beat Diane Abbott, though.
00:26:16,691
→
00:26:16,891
Okay.
00:26:16,891
→
00:26:19,121
Who you remember was lent the vote by- to get in
00:26:19,121
→
00:26:19,171
the
00:26:19,671
→
00:26:19,951
because
00:26:19,977
→
00:26:20,467
David Miliband
00:26:20,671
→
00:26:21,391
" This is quite embarrassing.
00:26:21,391
→
00:26:22,041
We're all white men."
00:26:22,811
→
00:26:24,891
Establishing a precedent that Labour MPs then followed
00:26:24,991
→
00:26:26,041
letting a left candidate in
00:26:26,041
→
00:26:27,831
2015. His name was
00:26:27,867
→
00:26:28,577
Jeremy Corbyn.
00:26:29,101
→
00:26:30,061
That went badly for them.
00:26:30,746
→
00:26:32,086
okay, in 2016,
00:26:32,496
→
00:26:33,566
Owen Smith challenged
00:26:33,566
→
00:26:34,426
Jeremy Corbyn
00:26:34,426
→
00:26:35,366
for the Labour leadership,
00:26:35,676
→
00:26:37,726
and the Labour left successfully painted him
00:26:37,726
→
00:26:37,826
as
00:26:37,826
→
00:26:38,206
a big
00:26:38,206
→
00:26:41,906
pharma shill because of his previous life as a lobbyist for Pfizer.
00:26:42,916
→
00:26:45,966
But which drug was He forced to deny having used?
00:26:46,776
→
00:26:47,296
Viagra.
00:26:47,559
→
00:26:47,939
Correct.
00:26:47,939
→
00:26:48,209
Oh.
00:26:48,209
→
00:26:48,549
Yeah.
00:26:49,059
→
00:26:49,499
He
00:26:49,600
→
00:26:50,020
It was
00:26:50,020
→
00:26:50,380
Viagra.
00:26:50,380
→
00:26:50,520
He
00:26:50,520
→
00:26:50,770
told
00:26:50,950
→
00:26:51,540
Piers Morgan,
00:26:51,610
→
00:26:52,090
asked about
00:26:52,090
→
00:26:53,050
it somewhat inevitably.
00:26:53,050
→
00:26:53,320
Of course he
00:26:53,320
→
00:26:53,500
did, Yeah,
00:26:53,720
→
00:26:54,340
That's for me
00:26:54,340
→
00:26:54,500
and
00:26:54,500
→
00:26:56,110
Mrs. Smith to know about."
00:26:56,340
→
00:26:56,700
Wow.
00:26:56,928
→
00:26:57,248
Yeah, he went
00:26:57,284
→
00:26:58,674
back to university.
00:26:59,264
→
00:26:59,794
Last Labour
00:26:59,794
→
00:27:00,734
candidate that who
00:27:00,734
→
00:27:01,734
could claim to have achieved growth.
00:27:03,397
→
00:27:03,447
It
00:27:03,447
→
00:27:04,607
didn't give him a bump in the polls?
00:27:04,673
→
00:27:04,833
Now
00:27:04,833
→
00:27:05,393
stop it.
00:27:05,393
→
00:27:05,603
Okay.
00:27:05,603
→
00:27:05,853
Okay.
00:27:05,853
→
00:27:05,953
All
00:27:05,967
→
00:27:06,467
of you,
00:27:06,673
→
00:27:07,493
think about what you've
00:27:07,493
→
00:27:07,793
done.
00:27:08,383
→
00:27:08,933
Also in
00:27:08,933
→
00:27:09,833
2016,
00:27:10,087
→
00:27:13,677
Angela Eagle's Labour leadership campaign... Now, yeah, okay, remember
00:27:13,677
→
00:27:13,847
this?
00:27:14,063
→
00:27:14,163
Yeah
00:27:14,203
→
00:27:16,473
was blighted by what technical difficulty?
00:27:16,963
→
00:27:17,293
A,
00:27:17,787
→
00:27:20,977
she had lost her voice and had to use gestures to indicate her
00:27:21,017
→
00:27:21,367
issues
00:27:21,404
→
00:27:21,794
with Jeremy
00:27:21,794
→
00:27:22,244
Corbyn.
00:27:22,883
→
00:27:24,493
Think
00:27:24,587
→
00:27:25,537
think, yeah, think to
00:27:25,573
→
00:27:26,043
yourself.
00:27:26,923
→
00:27:27,333
B,
00:27:27,363
→
00:27:29,283
one of the Tory leadership candidates
00:27:29,297
→
00:27:29,807
the same time
00:27:29,807
→
00:27:30,047
pulled
00:27:30,093
→
00:27:30,322
out of,
00:27:30,363
→
00:27:30,553
their
00:27:31,037
→
00:27:31,797
during her speech
00:27:31,797
→
00:27:32,797
causing all the journos to
00:27:32,797
→
00:27:33,287
flee.
00:27:34,137
→
00:27:35,237
C, the
00:27:35,237
→
00:27:36,697
day before, BBC News had
00:27:36,757
→
00:27:39,597
accidentally booked her twin, Maria Eagle, to
00:27:39,597
→
00:27:39,977
talk about
00:27:40,014
→
00:27:40,494
the contest
00:27:40,494
→
00:27:40,554
on
00:27:40,637
→
00:27:41,087
Newsnight.
00:27:41,744
→
00:27:41,884
Or
00:27:41,893
→
00:27:42,423
D,
00:27:42,637
→
00:27:45,427
one of the banners at the front of the hall collapsed revealing
00:27:45,427
→
00:27:46,827
Tom Watson hiding behind
00:27:46,873
→
00:27:47,023
it
00:27:47,285
→
00:27:48,155
that's brilliant.
00:27:48,192
→
00:27:48,422
I I
00:27:48,431
→
00:27:48,831
was gonna
00:27:48,831
→
00:27:49,051
say
00:27:49,051
→
00:27:50,191
B, but I remember it being
00:27:50,191
→
00:27:52,661
interrupted, not by Boris Johnson dropping out,
00:27:52,875
→
00:27:53,545
but by him being
00:27:53,545
→
00:27:54,985
appointed foreign secretary, wasn't it?
00:27:55,075
→
00:27:56,985
No, you're smudging things together in your mind.
00:27:56,985
→
00:27:57,175
Am
00:27:57,175
→
00:27:57,215
I?
00:27:57,221
→
00:27:57,391
I Okay.
00:27:57,391
→
00:27:57,741
I think it was-
00:27:57,741
→
00:27:57,871
I
00:27:57,871
→
00:27:58,021
think it
00:27:58,021
→
00:27:58,461
was B.
00:27:58,645
→
00:27:59,145
I think it was-
00:27:59,461
→
00:27:59,921
You think B, you're going B?
00:27:59,921
→
00:28:00,671
the same speech at the same time.
00:28:00,671
→
00:28:00,701
You're
00:28:00,701
→
00:28:01,001
going B?
00:28:01,472
→
00:28:01,712
You're going B?
00:28:01,772
→
00:28:04,492
I like the one where the BBC books the wrong person.
00:28:05,712
→
00:28:06,382
twin, Maria
00:28:06,745
→
00:28:06,805
Yeah.
00:28:06,851
→
00:28:07,031
They were
00:28:07,031
→
00:28:08,001
both in the parliament
00:28:08,025
→
00:28:08,335
same time.
00:28:08,615
→
00:28:10,005
It was B. Ah.
00:28:10,248
→
00:28:12,018
it was Andrea Leadsom who pulled out.
00:28:12,358
→
00:28:12,948
Okay.
00:28:13,028
→
00:28:13,288
Yes.
00:28:13,288
→
00:28:15,508
She went for a question saying- Leadsom ... "Can I take a question
00:28:15,508
→
00:28:17,928
from Robert Peston?" He wasn't there.
00:28:17,998
→
00:28:18,308
Oh.
00:28:18,308
→
00:28:18,448
He'd
00:28:18,448
→
00:28:18,938
left.
00:28:19,118
→
00:28:19,588
Oh.
00:28:19,588
→
00:28:20,128
And that,
00:28:20,308
→
00:28:20,658
it never
00:28:20,658
→
00:28:21,038
recovered.
00:28:21,038
→
00:28:22,668
Her whole, basically her leadership campaign.
00:28:22,668
→
00:28:23,168
It's what they say, if you've
00:28:23,168
→
00:28:24,528
lost Peston, you've lost the leadership,
00:28:24,629
→
00:28:24,998
don't they?
00:28:25,848
→
00:28:27,508
Did Andrea Leadsom drop out because
00:28:27,567
→
00:28:27,597
a
00:28:27,597
→
00:28:28,007
CV
00:28:28,007
→
00:28:28,567
issue?
00:28:28,927
→
00:28:30,517
No, She dropped out- 'cause she said- No
00:28:30,517
→
00:28:32,557
Theresa May won't be able to understand the country 'cause
00:28:32,557
→
00:28:33,447
she doesn't have children.
00:28:33,847
→
00:28:35,827
An incredible Times front page with that
00:28:35,827
→
00:28:36,897
interview with Andrea Leadsom,
00:28:36,897
→
00:28:41,457
and then Stephen Crabb had been sexting a young person inappropriately, and just
00:28:41,457
→
00:28:43,437
the ti- one day, The Times just nuked
00:28:44,047
→
00:28:44,367
two of
00:28:44,367
→
00:28:44,537
them at
00:28:44,578
→
00:28:44,628
the
00:28:44,837
→
00:28:45,197
time.
00:28:45,447
→
00:28:48,577
for any younger viewers, maybe the people on YouTube, just ask
00:28:48,577
→
00:28:49,897
your parents about all this.
00:28:49,977
→
00:28:50,369
Stephen
00:28:50,472
→
00:28:50,762
Crabb.
00:28:50,762
→
00:28:50,922
to
00:28:50,987
→
00:28:51,687
Stephen Crabb.
00:28:51,732
→
00:28:52,012
Just to
00:28:52,012
→
00:28:53,982
specify quite what a brilliant media operator,
00:28:54,137
→
00:28:54,797
And- Andrea
00:28:54,797
→
00:28:55,537
Leadsom was, the
00:28:55,572
→
00:28:55,862
full
00:28:56,137
→
00:28:56,767
was something along
00:28:56,767
→
00:28:57,797
the lines of, "I
00:28:57,832
→
00:28:58,442
wouldn't want to say
00:28:58,442
→
00:28:58,932
this in public
00:28:59,027
→
00:29:00,037
it's really nasty."
00:29:00,397
→
00:29:00,527
"But
00:29:00,548
→
00:29:00,968
Theresa
00:29:00,968
→
00:29:01,178
wouldn't
00:29:01,178
→
00:29:02,068
be a good prime minister
00:29:02,177
→
00:29:02,887
she hasn't got
00:29:02,887
→
00:29:03,637
children," she
00:29:03,682
→
00:29:04,762
said to a journalist with a
00:29:04,762
→
00:29:05,512
tape recorder.
00:29:05,512
→
00:29:05,622
Said
00:29:06,267
→
00:29:06,407
Said
00:29:06,467
→
00:29:07,117
it once-
00:29:07,117
→
00:29:07,217
and-
00:29:07,228
→
00:29:09,158
it once- for the younger people you've just referred
00:29:09,158
→
00:29:09,318
to,
00:29:09,447
→
00:29:09,887
it does
00:29:09,887
→
00:29:10,927
suggest that politics
00:29:11,578
→
00:29:13,078
doesn't just get worse.
00:29:13,078
→
00:29:13,138
Yeah.
00:29:13,138
→
00:29:14,848
It sometimes stays quite the same.
00:29:15,062
→
00:29:15,162
Oh,
00:29:15,162
→
00:29:15,302
that?
00:29:15,302
→
00:29:15,512
was
00:29:15,677
→
00:29:15,867
an...
00:29:16,147
→
00:29:18,357
I feel sad for anyone who can't remember that, 'cause that was also
00:29:18,712
→
00:29:19,232
surely the
00:29:19,232
→
00:29:20,512
one where Boris Johnson was
00:29:20,512
→
00:29:20,732
going
00:29:20,818
→
00:29:21,358
stand, and
00:29:21,487
→
00:29:23,577
the morning of his campaign launch, Michael Gove
00:29:23,622
→
00:29:24,192
knifed him.
00:29:24,207
→
00:29:24,447
and then he
00:29:24,462
→
00:29:24,742
he had to
00:29:24,742
→
00:29:25,812
go and give a speech
00:29:25,982
→
00:29:27,112
saying, "I'm not
00:29:27,117
→
00:29:27,937
going to stand." Yeah.
00:29:27,997
→
00:29:28,337
Yes.
00:29:28,387
→
00:29:28,757
And then
00:29:28,802
→
00:29:29,072
then Michael
00:29:29,072
→
00:29:29,472
And gloriously,
00:29:29,507
→
00:29:30,777
camera was on Nadine Dorries,
00:29:30,777
→
00:29:30,887
who
00:29:30,887
→
00:29:31,607
reacted, who'd been
00:29:31,607
→
00:29:32,937
expecting him to say, "I will be your next
00:29:32,937
→
00:29:34,797
prime minister," and just the, find it
00:29:34,797
→
00:29:34,897
on
00:29:34,897
→
00:29:36,687
YouTube, the look of devastation that creeps
00:29:36,687
→
00:29:37,217
across her face as
00:29:37,217
→
00:29:38,507
she grabs the man next to her's arm.
00:29:38,677
→
00:29:38,847
Oh.
00:29:38,937
→
00:29:39,237
Oh.
00:29:39,442
→
00:29:39,802
It's worth it
00:29:39,808
→
00:29:40,068
Michael
00:29:40,068
→
00:29:41,807
Gove's finest hour.
00:29:42,378
→
00:29:43,468
Yeah,
00:29:43,621
→
00:29:43,868
definitely.
00:29:43,868
→
00:29:44,198
Okay,
00:29:44,780
→
00:29:48,830
riffing on Gerard Kaufman's famous description of Michael Foot's 1983
00:29:48,830
→
00:29:51,340
manifesto, how did the journalist Chris
00:29:51,340
→
00:29:55,340
Deering once describe the Ed Stone, Ed Miliband's obelisk of
00:29:55,340
→
00:29:56,170
electoral pledges?
00:29:56,917
→
00:29:59,347
the tallest suicide note in history?
00:29:59,587
→
00:30:00,137
Nearly.
00:30:00,137
→
00:30:00,387
So
00:30:00,387
→
00:30:00,827
nearly.
00:30:01,054
→
00:30:01,134
The
00:30:01,134
→
00:30:01,714
Hardest,
00:30:01,894
→
00:30:02,314
Yes,
00:30:02,359
→
00:30:03,249
yeah, that's where I was going.
00:30:03,249
→
00:30:04,689
I've gone back to Owen
00:30:04,689
→
00:30:04,929
Smith
00:30:04,931
→
00:30:05,061
and the
00:30:05,061
→
00:30:05,321
lime.
00:30:05,321
→
00:30:05,391
But,
00:30:05,784
→
00:30:05,934
bike.
00:30:07,274
→
00:30:08,294
It was the heaviest
00:30:08,294
→
00:30:08,934
suicide note
00:30:09,111
→
00:30:09,171
in
00:30:09,171
→
00:30:09,381
history.
00:30:09,441
→
00:30:09,551
Oh, Oh,
00:30:09,551
→
00:30:10,001
yes.
00:30:10,074
→
00:30:13,414
He described, the 1983 manifesto of Labour as the longest suicide
00:30:13,414
→
00:30:13,704
note in
00:30:13,704
→
00:30:13,934
history.
00:30:13,934
→
00:30:14,324
Yes.
00:30:14,529
→
00:30:14,619
I
00:30:14,734
→
00:30:14,954
know who's
00:30:14,954
→
00:30:15,254
winning, but
00:30:15,299
→
00:30:15,729
I'm gonna give you
00:30:15,781
→
00:30:16,691
tiebreaker anyway.
00:30:16,781
→
00:30:17,301
It's Adam
00:30:17,301
→
00:30:17,821
who's winning.
00:30:17,821
→
00:30:17,951
Yeah,
00:30:17,959
→
00:30:18,349
it's Adam
00:30:18,434
→
00:30:18,684
winning.
00:30:19,064
→
00:30:19,284
he knew
00:30:19,284
→
00:30:19,534
about
00:30:19,541
→
00:30:20,181
1964.
00:30:20,181
→
00:30:20,271
In
00:30:20,279
→
00:30:20,829
what year?
00:30:20,859
→
00:30:21,489
The
00:30:21,514
→
00:30:21,854
late
00:30:21,854
→
00:30:22,114
Empire...
00:30:22,199
→
00:30:22,549
yeah,
00:30:22,869
→
00:30:22,959
yeah,
00:30:23,709
→
00:30:25,049
When pictured out running- Yes
00:30:25,691
→
00:30:25,841
Yes ... in
00:30:25,904
→
00:30:27,954
short shorts, Andy
00:30:27,999
→
00:30:30,029
Burnham was wearing a replica vintage
00:30:30,034
→
00:30:30,914
Everton shirt.
00:30:31,074
→
00:30:33,114
from which period of the club's history
00:30:33,149
→
00:30:33,429
did it come?
00:30:33,581
→
00:30:33,751
Ding,
00:30:33,921
→
00:30:34,401
ding, ding,
00:30:34,409
→
00:30:34,859
ding, 1980.
00:30:35,259
→
00:30:35,679
Oh my God.
00:30:35,861
→
00:30:35,921
I
00:30:35,921
→
00:30:37,441
got a football question right.
00:30:38,444
→
00:30:39,594
Ian and I
00:30:39,639
→
00:30:39,739
are
00:30:39,781
→
00:30:40,261
still trying to
00:30:40,261
→
00:30:40,651
understand the
00:30:40,894
→
00:30:41,594
of reference.
00:30:42,454
→
00:30:43,844
Can I, suggest that's a
00:30:43,891
→
00:30:45,571
sackable offense?
00:30:45,811
→
00:30:47,251
It won't happen
00:30:47,251
→
00:30:47,731
again, boss.
00:30:47,731
→
00:30:48,221
Definitely.
00:30:48,351
→
00:30:49,051
this Thank
00:30:49,089
→
00:30:50,309
I would like, to say also- Yeah ... have you
00:30:50,451
→
00:30:50,801
he's gone out,
00:30:51,169
→
00:30:51,979
jogging again today
00:30:51,979
→
00:30:53,799
on the recording in rather longer shorts.
00:30:53,799
→
00:30:54,039
Longer shorts.
00:30:54,039
→
00:30:54,199
Yeah,
00:30:54,199
→
00:30:54,239
I
00:30:54,239
→
00:30:55,439
think he decided that was a mistake.
00:30:55,439
→
00:30:55,559
I think
00:30:55,559
→
00:30:55,989
Mrs. Burnham's had a
00:30:56,011
→
00:30:56,231
a word
00:30:56,231
→
00:30:56,531
about
00:30:56,789
→
00:30:56,889
away
00:30:56,889
→
00:30:57,939
the 1970s
00:30:58,044
→
00:30:58,604
pants and,
00:30:59,269
→
00:30:59,569
yes,
00:31:00,154
→
00:31:00,744
Can, I just
00:31:00,804
→
00:31:01,134
ask-
00:31:01,661
→
00:31:01,821
Yes ... the
00:31:01,821
→
00:31:02,291
assembled...
00:31:02,574
→
00:31:03,004
and this is a
00:31:03,061
→
00:31:04,131
a serious political question.
00:31:04,484
→
00:31:04,594
do
00:31:04,631
→
00:31:07,511
you think on the day he knew he was going to be photographed
00:31:07,941
→
00:31:13,331
running about, the shorts were an error, carelessness, deliberate?
00:31:14,154
→
00:31:14,244
I
00:31:14,289
→
00:31:14,969
think he's got quite
00:31:15,174
→
00:31:15,504
legs,
00:31:15,539
→
00:31:17,189
and he thought he'd- I thought they looked good ... why not show them off?
00:31:17,189
→
00:31:17,389
I'm sorry,
00:31:17,389
→
00:31:17,909
but I'm,
00:31:17,909
→
00:31:17,959
a
00:31:17,959
→
00:31:18,169
fan
00:31:18,169
→
00:31:18,869
of the short-shorted
00:31:18,869
→
00:31:19,139
Burnham.
00:31:19,139
→
00:31:19,299
Yeah.
00:31:19,544
→
00:31:19,714
Yeah,
00:31:20,004
→
00:31:20,254
There we go.
00:31:20,271
→
00:31:20,851
we go.
00:31:21,501
→
00:31:21,981
that's, the
00:31:21,981
→
00:31:22,301
answer I
00:31:22,301
→
00:31:22,721
was hoping for.
00:31:22,721
→
00:31:24,281
Adam- UK's code for the boys
00:31:24,281
→
00:31:25,261
There's
00:31:25,261
→
00:31:25,681
your focus group.
00:31:25,704
→
00:31:25,794
Yeah.
00:31:28,272
→
00:31:28,652
right.
00:31:28,711
→
00:31:29,751
Now, for part two,
00:31:30,120
→
00:31:31,600
Adam, you have reincarnated
00:31:31,600
→
00:31:32,610
as Saba Salman.
00:31:32,610
→
00:31:32,840
Hello,
00:31:32,840
→
00:31:33,210
Saba.
00:31:33,510
→
00:31:33,920
Hello.
00:31:34,472
→
00:31:34,782
Saba
00:31:34,970
→
00:31:35,680
of Rotten Boroughs.
00:31:35,680
→
00:31:36,320
You were last on
00:31:36,680
→
00:31:38,950
a couple of, episodes ago when we were
00:31:38,950
→
00:31:40,950
doing a pre-mortem for
00:31:40,950
→
00:31:41,990
the local elections,
00:31:42,260
→
00:31:42,940
and now it's time
00:31:42,940
→
00:31:43,620
inevitably for the
00:31:43,620
→
00:31:44,430
post-mortem.
00:31:45,060
→
00:31:45,610
How did you
00:31:45,610
→
00:31:45,840
do?
00:31:45,840
→
00:31:46,150
How were
00:31:46,150
→
00:31:46,760
your predictions?
00:31:46,760
→
00:31:46,910
Was
00:31:46,971
→
00:31:47,471
there anything
00:31:47,730
→
00:31:48,470
you were right or
00:31:48,470
→
00:31:49,140
wrong about?
00:31:50,074
→
00:31:53,284
think my favorite bit was when one of the election experts, and we had many-
00:31:53,699
→
00:31:53,749
... Mm-hmm
00:31:53,954
→
00:31:54,704
Professor
00:31:54,804
→
00:31:59,494
John Curtice said, "Really no one's very popular." and that for
00:31:59,494
→
00:32:00,994
me kinda summed up a lot
00:32:00,994
→
00:32:02,034
of what was going on.
00:32:02,064
→
00:32:04,454
Nobody seemed very happy apart from,
00:32:04,569
→
00:32:07,589
a lot of Reform, candidates who obviously got in.
00:32:07,859
→
00:32:09,059
So I think largely our
00:32:09,059
→
00:32:11,399
predictions were pretty spot on.
00:32:11,894
→
00:32:16,719
we talked about fragmentation, we talked about the multi-parties, standing.
00:32:17,166
→
00:32:17,246
the
00:32:17,246
→
00:32:22,146
fact that, a lot of new candidates are coming in with no experience,
00:32:22,569
→
00:32:22,909
that's,
00:32:22,954
→
00:32:23,074
That
00:32:23,255
→
00:32:23,505
one of
00:32:23,505
→
00:32:24,255
your points.
00:32:24,255
→
00:32:24,515
That was
00:32:24,515
→
00:32:24,755
one of
00:32:24,799
→
00:32:25,359
points,
00:32:25,419
→
00:32:27,869
and not just restricted to a single party.
00:32:27,869
→
00:32:31,553
So I think, if you look at the map of England, if you're looking at England,
00:32:32,263
→
00:32:37,473
down the right-hand side, you've got the teal, a chonky teal bit, which is Reform.
00:32:38,143
→
00:32:43,223
down in the boot on the left southwest sort of side, you've got the
00:32:43,223
→
00:32:44,753
orange segment.
00:32:45,703
→
00:32:46,313
moving up,
00:32:46,683
→
00:32:47,813
it's no longer a red wall,
00:32:48,593
→
00:32:49,213
more like a
00:32:50,233
→
00:32:51,993
red windowsill- Trellis maybe.
00:32:51,993
→
00:32:52,053
Yeah
00:32:52,058
→
00:32:52,638
... or a trellis,
00:32:53,058
→
00:32:54,458
veranda- lots of holes in it.
00:32:54,598
→
00:32:54,738
Yeah
00:32:54,873
→
00:32:56,283
... windowsill, something like that.
00:32:56,903
→
00:32:59,723
and then in London, you come to London, and it's just a
00:32:59,723
→
00:33:01,513
complete mess.
00:33:02,803
→
00:33:04,483
so it's a bit more
00:33:04,483
→
00:33:06,793
Jackson Pollock-y, I think- ... there.
00:33:06,963
→
00:33:07,703
That's London for you.
00:33:07,813
→
00:33:07,923
Yeah.
00:33:07,923
→
00:33:11,243
Yeah, so round the outside of London you've got some blue.
00:33:11,243
→
00:33:11,493
You've
00:33:11,493
→
00:33:13,573
still got some Tory boroughs.
00:33:14,123
→
00:33:14,783
The doughnut,
00:33:14,843
→
00:33:15,883
as I believe- The doughnut ... they used to call it.
00:33:15,883
→
00:33:16,013
Yes.
00:33:16,043
→
00:33:16,193
Yes.
00:33:16,193
→
00:33:16,903
Like the idea of outer London.
00:33:16,903
→
00:33:17,143
I like that
00:33:17,143
→
00:33:17,613
analogy.
00:33:17,613
→
00:33:17,763
Yeah.
00:33:17,763
→
00:33:18,023
Yes,
00:33:18,023
→
00:33:21,123
it's more down to earth than the Jackson Pollock, but I like that Yes.
00:33:21,439
→
00:33:23,459
and you've got Havering, in
00:33:23,459
→
00:33:25,389
the east that's gone, to Reform.
00:33:25,929
→
00:33:27,299
some Green action going
00:33:27,299
→
00:33:27,499
on.
00:33:27,969
→
00:33:30,889
And then other boroughs, Croydon, for example, that we feature a,
00:33:30,889
→
00:33:34,859
lot in the boroughs, which has suddenly got five different parties.
00:33:34,859
→
00:33:39,279
So you've got Labour, Tory, independent, Reform, Green
00:33:39,739
→
00:33:40,209
No overall
00:33:40,209
→
00:33:44,079
control but a Conservative mayor who just scraped in-
00:33:44,165
→
00:33:44,255
Oh ...who
00:33:44,309
→
00:33:46,749
who we've just covered in the boroughs, which means that
00:33:47,279
→
00:33:48,589
although there's no overall
00:33:48,589
→
00:33:51,929
control, the swing is with the Tories, so effectively it's
00:33:52,283
→
00:33:53,179
Conservative- Conservative ... run.
00:33:53,691
→
00:33:53,791
can
00:33:53,791
→
00:33:55,721
I ask about the phenomenon you described of people with
00:33:55,721
→
00:33:57,911
very little experience, getting
00:33:58,041
→
00:33:58,461
in?
00:33:58,521
→
00:33:59,911
What is a more common
00:33:59,971
→
00:34:03,531
route for people who are thinking about putting their hat in the
00:34:03,531
→
00:34:04,471
ring to become a counselor?
00:34:04,471
→
00:34:06,961
What's the normal route which is being deviated
00:34:06,961
→
00:34:07,351
from here?
00:34:07,521
→
00:34:11,251
I think most of the people who've proved they can do the job come
00:34:11,251
→
00:34:12,771
up through the community network.
00:34:13,111
→
00:34:16,061
so they might be, a particularly active resident.
00:34:17,123
→
00:34:17,303
they've
00:34:17,481
→
00:34:18,781
in the area locally.
00:34:19,091
→
00:34:24,487
but what we've seen with this surge of 1,500, particularly the Reform councilors,
00:34:24,487
→
00:34:26,417
is people coming in with not much clue.
00:34:27,247
→
00:34:28,847
and that literally extends to.
00:34:28,847
→
00:34:29,517
not knowing
00:34:29,517
→
00:34:30,297
which Council,
00:34:30,657
→
00:34:31,817
you've just been elected to.
00:34:32,187
→
00:34:32,357
So
00:34:32,637
→
00:34:32,907
there's
00:34:32,907
→
00:34:33,607
somebody,
00:34:33,607
→
00:34:33,697
a
00:34:33,697
→
00:34:38,357
shout-out to Kidsgrove News, a local independent news
00:34:38,357
→
00:34:40,827
site, which, reported that a,
00:34:40,827
→
00:34:45,157
councilor who was, elected to Newcastle-under-Lyme
00:34:45,627
→
00:34:49,916
Borough Council, rocked up at Kidsgrove Town
00:34:49,916
→
00:34:53,396
Council, which is a parish, because she got confused.
00:34:53,396
→
00:34:56,806
about the name of the ward in Newcastle, Town Ward.
00:34:57,563
→
00:34:59,353
so she therefore- I can... I'm confused to be fair
00:34:59,353
→
00:34:59,653
You're confused.
00:35:00,003
→
00:35:00,133
there
00:35:00,133
→
00:35:00,503
you go.
00:35:00,533
→
00:35:00,763
Let's
00:35:00,824
→
00:35:01,114
give her some credit.
00:35:01,174
→
00:35:01,624
But I wasn't
00:35:01,734
→
00:35:02,224
st- I wasn't
00:35:02,513
→
00:35:02,663
to be
00:35:02,663
→
00:35:03,603
elected there, so you know.
00:35:03,783
→
00:35:03,953
Yeah.
00:35:03,983
→
00:35:04,183
Yeah.
00:35:04,213
→
00:35:05,743
I think it's this- If it had been a Newcastle upon
00:35:05,743
→
00:35:07,383
Tyne and Newcastle-under-Lyme
00:35:07,383
→
00:35:08,093
situation- Yes
00:35:08,093
→
00:35:08,613
then you'd got really worried.
00:35:08,753
→
00:35:09,083
admittedly
00:35:09,083
→
00:35:09,203
it
00:35:09,203
→
00:35:09,893
is confusing.
00:35:09,893
→
00:35:10,173
Although I
00:35:10,173
→
00:35:10,333
would
00:35:10,333
→
00:35:10,553
like
00:35:10,553
→
00:35:13,913
to think that, most people who put themselves forward for this- Yes ... would
00:35:13,993
→
00:35:18,893
probably have checked where they were standing a- and why, and know.
00:35:19,303
→
00:35:22,173
and the backdrop to this is that the election agent was a certain
00:35:22,173
→
00:35:26,573
Jonathan Gullis, who eagle-eyed readers, i readers might remember.
00:35:26,943
→
00:35:27,233
I think he
00:35:27,233
→
00:35:30,263
was appointed as an undersecretary by Liz Truss, so-
00:35:30,884
→
00:35:31,274
... whether or not,
00:35:31,514
→
00:35:31,574
know,
00:35:31,614
→
00:35:32,214
his latest
00:35:32,354
→
00:35:32,894
protege
00:35:33,473
→
00:35:35,123
lasts longer than a lettuce, I don't know.
00:35:35,123
→
00:35:35,823
but The Truss,
00:35:35,853
→
00:35:37,243
the Truss magic lives on.
00:35:37,243
→
00:35:37,523
I know,
00:35:37,523
→
00:35:38,193
doesn't it?
00:35:38,801
→
00:35:40,461
and then over in Suffolk,
00:35:41,461
→
00:35:44,271
we've got a situation where the new Reform leader has come in
00:35:44,271
→
00:35:46,425
and said, "We need some training
00:35:47,055
→
00:35:47,175
to
00:35:47,515
→
00:35:48,365
get up to speed.
00:35:48,808
→
00:35:49,748
so we think we need
00:35:49,748
→
00:35:53,738
about six months of training and then an intensive day for our raft
00:35:53,738
→
00:35:58,208
of councilors." And I think to most people who don't know a lot about local
00:35:58,208
→
00:36:02,318
government or public sector, most of us hire people for a job that know
00:36:02,453
→
00:36:03,183
how to do it,
00:36:03,218
→
00:36:04,418
as opposed to turning
00:36:04,418
→
00:36:04,718
up
00:36:05,198
→
00:36:06,778
and going, "Where do I start?"
00:36:07,383
→
00:36:08,763
we're not talking about internships.
00:36:08,763
→
00:36:10,173
We're talking about directly
00:36:10,243
→
00:36:13,453
elected officials- Yeah ... who are, who have a job to do
00:36:13,453
→
00:36:14,793
and are controlling budgets.
00:36:14,863
→
00:36:16,513
But there is some training and briefing if you're
00:36:16,513
→
00:36:17,313
" newly elected as a
00:36:17,313
→
00:36:18,093
councilor- Yes, of course.
00:36:18,093
→
00:36:18,503
I presume.
00:36:18,833
→
00:36:18,903
Yeah.
00:36:19,043
→
00:36:19,393
there, there's
00:36:19,393
→
00:36:20,243
all sorts of things.
00:36:20,243
→
00:36:20,513
There's,
00:36:20,753
→
00:36:22,013
you have your political group in a
00:36:22,013
→
00:36:22,753
council.
00:36:24,253
→
00:36:26,673
you might wanna do your own research, perhaps.
00:36:26,703
→
00:36:29,623
But- look at the council handbook, download it.
00:36:30,283
→
00:36:32,823
there's also something called the Local Government Association, for
00:36:32,823
→
00:36:34,613
example, which is a membership body,
00:36:34,933
→
00:36:36,553
that most councils belong to, and within
00:36:36,553
→
00:36:39,963
that, each political party has a presence.
00:36:40,133
→
00:36:43,133
So at the LGA, Local Government Association, you have your
00:36:43,133
→
00:36:44,183
own little group office.
00:36:44,633
→
00:36:46,483
And interestingly, I have been checking,
00:36:46,863
→
00:36:50,933
and the Green Party does not appear to be represented, at the
00:36:50,933
→
00:36:53,463
LGA with its own political office,
00:36:54,203
→
00:36:54,433
which
00:36:54,783
→
00:36:55,473
is interesting.
00:36:55,703
→
00:36:58,743
they might have chosen not to, but considering they've come in with a
00:36:58,743
→
00:37:01,943
bunch of councilors and now control four councils, and they've got these mayors,
00:37:02,533
→
00:37:04,263
they might wanna have a presence there.
00:37:04,543
→
00:37:06,813
Whether it's the website's not been updated, I
00:37:06,813
→
00:37:07,233
don't know.
00:37:07,273
→
00:37:07,883
But it's just
00:37:07,883
→
00:37:08,563
interesting,
00:37:08,813
→
00:37:11,573
one of the interesting things about Hannah Spencer running for that seat in Gorton
00:37:11,573
→
00:37:15,233
and Denton, she's got a family who lots of them have worked in politics, and that was
00:37:15,233
→
00:37:17,303
just completely never mentioned, right?
00:37:17,363
→
00:37:17,843
It was all about
00:37:17,843
→
00:37:18,673
she's a plumber.
00:37:19,153
→
00:37:19,463
She's got a
00:37:19,513
→
00:37:19,873
a normal
00:37:19,904
→
00:37:20,084
job,
00:37:20,153
→
00:37:20,853
she's just happened.
00:37:20,853
→
00:37:23,883
This is, she's stumbled into politics almost because that would
00:37:23,883
→
00:37:25,123
seem to be a much more appealing
00:37:25,123
→
00:37:25,893
message to people.
00:37:26,163
→
00:37:26,863
And that seems to be
00:37:26,973
→
00:37:27,693
what you're
00:37:27,943
→
00:37:28,303
about, right?
00:37:28,303
→
00:37:29,623
That actually there's a
00:37:29,633
→
00:37:29,793
l- a
00:37:29,833
→
00:37:30,493
sort of love
00:37:30,524
→
00:37:30,704
for
00:37:30,723
→
00:37:31,003
the fact
00:37:31,003
→
00:37:32,023
that you're a, quote-unquote,
00:37:32,103
→
00:37:34,013
"ordinary person," not a career politician.
00:37:34,253
→
00:37:35,143
I think it's difficult.
00:37:35,493
→
00:37:38,113
I absolutely agree That if you're a bit edgy, you've got no
00:37:38,113
→
00:37:39,633
experience, let's give it a go.
00:37:39,633
→
00:37:40,323
I'm learning on the
00:37:40,323
→
00:37:41,913
job, I think where a lot of
00:37:41,913
→
00:37:47,103
people, who, vote have a problem with it is That you are
00:37:47,103
→
00:37:47,873
trusting
00:37:48,713
→
00:37:49,963
in somebody who
00:37:49,963
→
00:37:52,773
has absolutely no idea what they're doing.
00:37:52,803
→
00:37:53,843
I don't mean Hannah Spencer.
00:37:54,773
→
00:37:55,593
there are exceptions.
00:37:55,593
→
00:37:58,513
There are people who've been rumbling around their communities- doing great
00:37:58,513
→
00:38:02,133
work, painting the community center or whatever it is, being a teaching
00:38:02,133
→
00:38:03,373
assistant, whatever it may be.
00:38:03,783
→
00:38:05,253
They're really embedded in their communities, and
00:38:05,463
→
00:38:06,363
they've, got no,
00:38:06,815
→
00:38:07,755
political career.
00:38:07,975
→
00:38:09,415
they don't wanna climb the gl- greasy pole.
00:38:09,415
→
00:38:13,685
But then on the flip side, you've got people, like, you know, well, we
00:38:13,685
→
00:38:16,865
talked about the Warwickshire, teenage Warwickshire leader before in the
00:38:16,865
→
00:38:22,655
last podcast I was in, George Finch, who clearly has his eyes set firmly
00:38:23,535
→
00:38:23,725
on
00:38:23,725
→
00:38:24,425
Westminster.
00:38:25,118
→
00:38:25,308
Is
00:38:25,370
→
00:38:25,980
the argument that
00:38:26,004
→
00:38:26,124
that
00:38:26,624
→
00:38:26,704
the
00:38:26,760
→
00:38:28,480
officers are meant to know how to do this
00:38:28,480
→
00:38:28,910
stuff
00:38:29,984
→
00:38:30,104
so
00:38:30,453
→
00:38:30,803
you're not
00:38:30,840
→
00:38:33,680
completely saying, it's hopeless.
00:38:33,680
→
00:38:34,950
None of these people know how to do anything"?
00:38:34,950
→
00:38:38,175
There are- There is a group of non-political people there already.
00:38:38,263
→
00:38:38,863
Absolutely.
00:38:38,863
→
00:38:39,003
So
00:38:39,003
→
00:38:43,623
if you use the analogy, in a way of, central government, you've got
00:38:43,623
→
00:38:45,543
the elected member, and then you've
00:38:45,543
→
00:38:48,593
got, the civil servants who know what they're doing.
00:38:49,163
→
00:38:51,043
and I think what's interesting about what's happening
00:38:51,043
→
00:38:51,543
now,
00:38:52,423
→
00:38:54,533
is I'm sure what happens in central government, is that
00:38:54,533
→
00:38:55,813
you've got all of these,
00:38:56,849
→
00:38:57,139
many,
00:38:57,477
→
00:39:02,847
officers, paid officials who are non-political going, "Oh my God,
00:39:03,207
→
00:39:07,077
what is going on here?" because all of a sudden you've got a
00:39:07,077
→
00:39:08,637
bunch of new people coming in.
00:39:09,094
→
00:39:12,654
suddenly maybe your council's gone into no overall control, so that means,
00:39:13,044
→
00:39:16,134
as we said last time on the podcast, that decisions may take longer-
00:39:16,674
→
00:39:16,774
to
00:39:16,774
→
00:39:17,344
get through.
00:39:17,924
→
00:39:18,774
and certainly,
00:39:19,704
→
00:39:23,974
on Rotten Boroughs, we have had communications from people who work in
00:39:23,974
→
00:39:26,324
councils, whose name shall not be revealed-
00:39:26,751
→
00:39:29,581
who are saying, in all seriousness, "We're really worried.
00:39:30,721
→
00:39:33,541
We're really worried because we've had these policies, we've
00:39:33,621
→
00:39:37,111
got, kids with special needs, we've got housing crisis, we've
00:39:37,171
→
00:39:41,831
got bankrupt council, and we've suddenly got people who
00:39:41,871
→
00:39:46,248
have never represented, a local, community before."
00:39:46,825
→
00:39:47,785
some people,
00:39:48,055
→
00:39:52,145
as you've said, have applied and they've got no experience, and that
00:39:52,285
→
00:39:54,995
there's a slightly different phenomenon, which is where you've got, as we say,
00:39:54,995
→
00:39:57,095
paper candidates who didn't expect
00:39:57,095
→
00:39:57,155
to
00:39:57,165
→
00:39:57,465
to win at
00:39:57,525
→
00:39:58,765
all, didn't think they would,
00:39:59,075
→
00:39:59,215
are,
00:39:59,215
→
00:40:01,025
really just there to be a
00:40:01,025
→
00:40:04,295
name to represent their party or the party they support, and then they
00:40:04,295
→
00:40:04,875
end up winning.
00:40:05,165
→
00:40:05,735
That's right, and
00:40:05,735
→
00:40:08,375
I think we saw some of this with the last local elections
00:40:08,375
→
00:40:10,255
particularly, again, with Reform.
00:40:10,865
→
00:40:14,525
but I think also there are, there are reports that this happened
00:40:14,735
→
00:40:16,315
amongst Green candidates as well.
00:40:16,775
→
00:40:20,635
And so what you have is a few days after the election results were announced,
00:40:21,235
→
00:40:25,255
you had stories of certain councilors, I believe they were Reform councilors,
00:40:25,255
→
00:40:26,265
going off on holiday,
00:40:27,315
→
00:40:31,285
because they didn't really think they'd get in and quite fancied a break.
00:40:31,965
→
00:40:35,745
and I think, according to Mark Pack, who's a Lib Dem peer,
00:40:36,085
→
00:40:37,215
who has a very good tracker,
00:40:37,505
→
00:40:40,095
keeps track of, the amount of councilors from Reform
00:40:40,275
→
00:40:40,545
who've
00:40:41,075
→
00:40:42,605
departed for various reasons.
00:40:43,035
→
00:40:47,155
I think we've had about 10 who've left since May the 7th-
00:40:47,205
→
00:40:47,465
7th-
00:40:48,245
→
00:40:48,825
this year.
00:40:49,056
→
00:40:49,516
That's quite a
00:40:49,556
→
00:40:49,696
lot.
00:40:49,825
→
00:40:49,875
That's,
00:40:49,925
→
00:40:50,475
quite a lot.
00:40:50,475
→
00:40:54,175
In addition to the 70 or so that had left bet- you know, b-
00:40:54,795
→
00:40:57,355
from last May, the last lot of
00:40:57,355
→
00:40:58,625
local elections to now.
00:40:58,815
→
00:40:59,765
and that's money, "Right, yes.
00:40:59,765
→
00:41:00,245
Because they'll have
00:41:00,245
→
00:41:00,345
the
00:41:00,345
→
00:41:00,775
...those...
00:41:00,825
→
00:41:00,935
They,
00:41:00,975
→
00:41:03,075
you can't just appoint new people to those positions.
00:41:03,075
→
00:41:04,915
They'll have to rerun those elections.
00:41:05,201
→
00:41:09,801
given that, Reform in particular is about efficiency, and, let's
00:41:09,801
→
00:41:10,921
not single out Reform here.
00:41:10,921
→
00:41:12,351
It happens with other parties as well.
00:41:13,211
→
00:41:15,821
but if you're trying to save money and the average by-election
00:41:15,881
→
00:41:17,611
and award costs about 20 grand-
00:41:19,306
→
00:41:20,116
That's not a great
00:41:20,116
→
00:41:22,366
use of funds, is It And we?
00:41:22,366
→
00:41:23,697
mentioned Croydon, for example.
00:41:23,756
→
00:41:28,276
Lynn's example there at the moment where the green, candidate was suspended
00:41:28,276
→
00:41:30,776
shortly before the election, but too late to be taken off the, ballot.
00:41:30,776
→
00:41:31,046
paper.
00:41:31,046
→
00:41:34,336
Now this has happened, this happened with an Aspire candidate in Tower Hamlets.
00:41:34,336
→
00:41:36,276
It's happened with other candidates elsewhere.
00:41:36,765
→
00:41:37,895
and so he remained
00:41:37,895
→
00:41:38,515
on the ballot He got
00:41:38,515
→
00:41:40,075
elected, and he's currently under
00:41:40,075
→
00:41:46,257
investigation for allegedly making antisemitic, sorry, perpetuating- posts
00:41:46,517
→
00:41:46,917
online.
00:41:47,709
→
00:41:52,109
Can I say that the reaction to the lack of experience from my reading of the boroughs
00:41:52,169
→
00:41:52,289
is,
00:41:53,287
→
00:41:53,647
they come
00:41:53,689
→
00:41:53,749
in
00:41:53,789
→
00:41:54,409
and they say
00:41:55,577
→
00:41:55,857
it's
00:41:55,969
→
00:41:56,469
day one.
00:41:56,569
→
00:41:56,889
We're going
00:41:56,949
→
00:41:58,934
to, eliminate all the waste.
00:41:59,254
→
00:41:59,994
We're going to free
00:42:00,074
→
00:42:00,794
Palestine.
00:42:01,064
→
00:42:01,454
"We're going
00:42:01,574
→
00:42:01,934
to
00:42:01,994
→
00:42:04,674
stop woke nonsense," whatever the agenda
00:42:04,694
→
00:42:04,764
is.
00:42:05,014
→
00:42:05,554
And then day
00:42:05,614
→
00:42:06,424
four they say,
00:42:06,964
→
00:42:08,334
"I think we're gonna have to put the rates
00:42:08,412
→
00:42:08,492
up."
00:42:08,648
→
00:42:08,738
up."
00:42:09,032
→
00:42:09,092
Yeah.
00:42:09,383
→
00:42:09,703
Yes.
00:42:09,913
→
00:42:10,973
And, they come in exactly
00:42:10,973
→
00:42:11,173
that.
00:42:11,173
→
00:42:12,803
They come in and say, "We're gonna stop the boats.
00:42:12,803
→
00:42:14,143
We're gonna fix the NHS.
00:42:14,753
→
00:42:17,363
we're gonna get rid of, with the climate change non- nonsense, we're
00:42:17,363
→
00:42:21,543
gonna get rid of net zero." and what they fail to realize is, number one,
00:42:22,293
→
00:42:23,473
local authorities have no,
00:42:24,413
→
00:42:26,763
duty, no responsibility, no power to do that.
00:42:27,163
→
00:42:29,993
But number two, there are s- processes you have to go through.
00:42:29,993
→
00:42:31,903
So for example, you come in, you have to wait for the
00:42:31,903
→
00:42:36,003
full council meeting to be elected, for example, as the leader
00:42:36,753
→
00:42:38,073
you have different committees.
00:42:38,073
→
00:42:38,933
There's all sorts
00:42:38,933
→
00:42:41,693
of machinations that people don't know
00:42:41,693
→
00:42:42,263
about.
00:42:42,770
→
00:42:43,110
the point
00:42:43,470
→
00:42:43,550
you
00:42:43,558
→
00:42:44,418
always make is
00:42:44,890
→
00:42:45,240
there really
00:42:45,310
→
00:42:46,270
isn't any money.
00:42:46,928
→
00:42:47,058
No,
00:42:47,348
→
00:42:47,378
absolutely.
00:42:47,420
→
00:42:48,110
They're not pretending
00:42:48,150
→
00:42:48,350
there's
00:42:48,370
→
00:42:48,850
no money.
00:42:48,990
→
00:42:49,129
No.
00:42:49,290
→
00:42:49,450
And- there
00:42:49,510
→
00:42:50,170
isn't any money.
00:42:50,268
→
00:42:51,328
but we didn't
00:42:51,348
→
00:42:52,728
hear much of that during
00:42:52,750
→
00:42:52,810
the
00:42:52,850
→
00:42:53,270
election,
00:42:53,348
→
00:42:53,428
did
00:42:53,438
→
00:42:53,588
we?
00:42:53,728
→
00:42:54,038
No.
00:42:54,108
→
00:42:59,298
And I think that, there is no money, and that money, has not
00:42:59,298
→
00:43:00,768
been there for a long time.
00:43:00,768
→
00:43:03,218
So it's successive years where there's less and less money
00:43:03,218
→
00:43:04,208
coming in from local government.
00:43:04,208
→
00:43:05,578
So obviously you're having to raise
00:43:05,578
→
00:43:06,478
the council tax.
00:43:06,478
→
00:43:07,658
So one of the
00:43:07,658
→
00:43:09,468
areas we've talked about in the past is
00:43:09,468
→
00:43:11,578
Worcestershire County Council, where they've
00:43:11,578
→
00:43:15,958
had to put up, council tax by, 9%.
00:43:16,678
→
00:43:17,928
now, that's a Reform
00:43:17,928
→
00:43:19,518
council that was voted in
00:43:19,768
→
00:43:20,638
last year.
00:43:21,538
→
00:43:21,778
and it
00:43:21,808
→
00:43:22,708
it inherited
00:43:23,468
→
00:43:25,088
massive financial difficulty.
00:43:25,418
→
00:43:31,818
So coming in saying, generally the party, approach is council tax low,
00:43:32,268
→
00:43:33,828
they've obviously been unable to do that.
00:43:34,490
→
00:43:38,210
Worcestershire in particular, if we want to We talked about the predictions.
00:43:38,820
→
00:43:41,600
so one interesting thing is to look at the councils that have
00:43:41,600
→
00:43:44,750
been run, by Reform in, last surge.
00:43:45,120
→
00:43:45,490
a year
00:43:45,490
→
00:43:47,070
ago they came in, say Worcestershire.
00:43:47,500
→
00:43:48,940
That's completely imploded.
00:43:49,563
→
00:43:52,673
the leader of the council has been ousted by a coalition of other
00:43:52,673
→
00:43:53,343
parties.
00:43:54,003
→
00:43:55,193
she's been suspended,
00:43:55,613
→
00:43:59,443
and her son, who's also a Reform councilor in a borough council just
00:43:59,443
→
00:44:02,503
on lower tier, has also been suspended.
00:44:03,253
→
00:44:04,051
what do you say there, Saba,
00:44:04,051
→
00:44:04,381
about,
00:44:04,960
→
00:44:05,240
people
00:44:05,660
→
00:44:06,260
not realizing
00:44:06,283
→
00:44:06,433
there's
00:44:06,433
→
00:44:06,573
no
00:44:06,573
→
00:44:08,013
money and then
00:44:08,233
→
00:44:08,443
coun-
00:44:08,443
→
00:44:10,703
councils being voted in and then discovering there's
00:44:10,780
→
00:44:11,260
no money,
00:44:11,818
→
00:44:11,957
This
00:44:12,000
→
00:44:12,090
is
00:44:13,048
→
00:44:13,198
just
00:44:13,293
→
00:44:14,803
smaller version of the entire national
00:44:15,213
→
00:44:15,683
condition,
00:44:15,840
→
00:44:15,990
isn't
00:44:16,048
→
00:44:16,098
it?
00:44:16,139
→
00:44:16,189
Mm. I
00:44:17,243
→
00:44:17,373
there's
00:44:17,468
→
00:44:18,188
no money, We
00:44:18,200
→
00:44:18,680
all think there
00:44:19,003
→
00:44:19,093
we
00:44:19,108
→
00:44:19,148
We
00:44:19,188
→
00:44:21,008
all want there to be more money, but there isn't any,
00:44:21,183
→
00:44:21,573
and we keep
00:44:21,668
→
00:44:21,938
voting for
00:44:21,968
→
00:44:22,968
people who say, "Don't worry, we'll sort
00:44:23,048
→
00:44:23,548
out more money."
00:44:23,643
→
00:44:26,003
I think you've summarized rotten boroughs up really well there.
00:44:26,003
→
00:44:28,233
So I think we just, yeah, cancel the next edition and just
00:44:28,233
→
00:44:29,033
put that quote on.
00:44:29,033
→
00:44:29,183
Good.
00:44:29,183
→
00:44:30,393
But yes, effectively.
00:44:30,683
→
00:44:30,763
but
00:44:30,763
→
00:44:31,573
that's interesting because
00:44:31,573
→
00:44:32,853
Worcestershire is where I'm from,
00:44:32,853
→
00:44:33,673
and it's not a
00:44:33,873
→
00:44:34,873
it's not a place that's doing
00:44:34,973
→
00:44:36,303
badly, right?
00:44:36,303
→
00:44:36,663
It went
00:44:36,663
→
00:44:37,183
Labour in the
00:44:37,183
→
00:44:38,343
2024 general election,
00:44:38,370
→
00:44:38,670
and we, haven't
00:44:38,780
→
00:44:39,460
had a Tory
00:44:39,743
→
00:44:40,193
throughout that time.
00:44:40,193
→
00:44:41,083
That's the city center.
00:44:41,483
→
00:44:42,483
this is the regional.
00:44:42,783
→
00:44:42,983
But
00:44:43,473
→
00:44:46,833
there are much more deprived places in England than Worcestershire.
00:44:47,153
→
00:44:48,273
So that to me, I
00:44:48,273
→
00:44:48,903
don't know if
00:44:48,903
→
00:44:49,233
you've looked
00:44:49,233
→
00:44:50,303
at the figures, but I would've thought
00:44:50,303
→
00:44:51,433
that's a social care
00:44:51,723
→
00:44:54,113
one of our great themes in this is that adult social care
00:44:54,183
→
00:44:55,413
has blown, has just blown...
00:44:55,813
→
00:44:57,013
No matter if you've got a fairly
00:44:57,013
→
00:44:58,423
stable council base
00:44:58,423
→
00:44:58,553
of
00:44:58,553
→
00:45:01,623
taxpayers, you just can't meet your obligations, right?
00:45:01,623
→
00:45:01,993
That's-
00:45:02,093
→
00:45:04,683
No, you can't, and it's not getting any
00:45:04,683
→
00:45:05,153
easier.
00:45:05,153
→
00:45:06,333
People are living longer.
00:45:07,083
→
00:45:09,393
and there's no way out for any council
00:45:09,456
→
00:45:09,806
and so I
00:45:09,806
→
00:45:10,136
suppose,
00:45:10,136
→
00:45:10,636
Saba, you've
00:45:10,636
→
00:45:15,156
been looking at the local elections from a year ago and seeing where they've
00:45:15,156
→
00:45:17,064
ended up today Worcestershire's imploded.
00:45:17,064
→
00:45:17,654
Worcestershire's
00:45:17,824
→
00:45:18,244
imploded.
00:45:18,303
→
00:45:18,664
that's, right.
00:45:18,664
→
00:45:20,054
Alarming figure here, yeah.
00:45:20,274
→
00:45:21,324
But it was quite split, wasn't it?
00:45:21,324
→
00:45:24,384
Didn't it have some Reform and some Green and some this and some that
00:45:24,414
→
00:45:26,254
and... was yeah ......there was
00:45:26,254
→
00:45:27,624
no coherent message from the voters of
00:45:27,624
→
00:45:28,804
Worcestershire about what they wanted.
00:45:28,804
→
00:45:28,954
No,
00:45:28,954
→
00:45:35,094
And I think that's, just, going back to S- Sir John C- Curtis' quote about
00:45:35,094
→
00:45:40,844
nobody's very popular, that this is that fragmentation that, on one hand, isn't it
00:45:40,844
→
00:45:42,644
fantastic that we've got all this choice?
00:45:42,694
→
00:45:48,354
And so I can be represented and two doors down, there's my, neighbor who's voting in
00:45:48,354
→
00:45:48,444
a
00:45:48,674
→
00:45:51,544
sort of different way- also has representation.
00:45:51,544
→
00:45:51,754
But
00:45:52,804
→
00:45:53,804
in one sense you can say,
00:45:53,844
→
00:45:55,884
that's great, it's democratic," but in another
00:45:55,884
→
00:45:58,224
it leads to, deadlock.
00:45:58,543
→
00:46:01,033
and some very interesting characters getting elected.
00:46:01,560
→
00:46:02,600
that'll keep Rotten Boroughs full.
00:46:02,990
→
00:46:03,040
I
00:46:03,050
→
00:46:03,310
I don't
00:46:03,310
→
00:46:04,180
think there's any danger
00:46:04,180
→
00:46:04,240
of
00:46:04,240
→
00:46:04,340
you
00:46:04,340
→
00:46:04,600
running
00:46:04,610
→
00:46:05,170
of stories.
00:46:05,299
→
00:46:06,149
I can safely
00:46:06,149
→
00:46:06,719
say that
00:46:07,159
→
00:46:12,109
we are well-served- for color, intrigue, corruption, and,
00:46:12,429
→
00:46:13,749
dodgy political characters.
00:46:14,161
→
00:46:18,551
You mentioned last time that the, Reform campaign was launched in Sunderland.
00:46:18,721
→
00:46:22,071
Nigel Farage went himself and did a 2,000-seat venue, and it was,
00:46:22,291
→
00:46:24,981
big razzmatazz 'cause he was very optimistic about their chances there.
00:46:25,031
→
00:46:25,411
How did that
00:46:25,411
→
00:46:25,841
turn out?
00:46:27,171
→
00:46:29,111
it turned out well in terms of
00:46:29,241
→
00:46:30,521
they've got the council.
00:46:31,001
→
00:46:35,211
however, not long after they did that, there were allegations
00:46:35,571
→
00:46:40,721
of, racism, sexism, and then the usual stuff from several candidates, including
00:46:40,721
→
00:46:43,751
one who wanted to melt down Nigerian
00:46:43,751
→
00:46:45,751
people and fill potholes
00:46:46,501
→
00:46:46,911
with them.
00:46:47,710
→
00:46:47,960
Richard
00:46:47,960
→
00:46:48,260
Tice
00:46:48,260
→
00:46:49,240
was asked about that comment, and
00:46:49,240
→
00:46:52,945
essentially really l- low-balled it, and slightly dismissed it, I think,
00:46:52,970
→
00:46:54,730
which was I I found that quite shocking.
00:46:54,812
→
00:46:57,592
And James Cleverly, who I think his background is Ghanaian-British, was
00:46:57,592
→
00:47:00,942
like, "Come on." It was presented as this kind of, he said Nigerians get out.
00:47:00,942
→
00:47:04,682
And it was like he, he explicitly made a remark where he's "Nigerians are,
00:47:04,682
→
00:47:06,952
good for nothing apart from melting down to fill potholes." Like- That's
00:47:06,952
→
00:47:09,152
right ... most obvious racism, clang-
00:47:09,302
→
00:47:12,282
A- and I think ever heard ... that, in itself was astonishing, but what
00:47:12,282
→
00:47:16,332
was even more shocking was, as you say, Richard Tice going on to talk
00:47:16,332
→
00:47:19,542
to Laura Kuenssberg about this, and she said, what do you think?"
00:47:19,542
→
00:47:21,442
And he said, "No, we're just here to celebrate the
00:47:21,442
→
00:47:22,092
success."
00:47:22,546
→
00:47:22,846
That is
00:47:22,886
→
00:47:23,626
racism with a
00:47:23,686
→
00:47:24,945
local twist, isn't it?
00:47:25,583
→
00:47:26,483
That is it for this episode
00:47:26,483
→
00:47:27,543
of Page 94.
00:47:27,863
→
00:47:28,623
you so much
00:47:28,683
→
00:47:29,593
to Helen,
00:47:29,703
→
00:47:31,593
Sabbot/Adam, Ian.
00:47:32,343
→
00:47:32,943
we'll be back
00:47:33,003
→
00:47:34,123
soon with our Paul
00:47:34,333
→
00:47:35,523
Award specials.
00:47:35,673
→
00:47:35,803
I'm
00:47:35,803
→
00:47:36,643
gonna be interviewing all the
00:47:36,643
→
00:47:39,193
shortlists for this year's, Paul Foot Award.
00:47:39,233
→
00:47:39,893
It's A brilliant
00:47:39,923
→
00:47:40,863
raft of stories
00:47:40,863
→
00:47:42,503
that have been nominated, and we'll
00:47:42,503
→
00:47:43,873
be back, after
00:47:43,873
→
00:47:44,713
another fortnight
00:47:44,713
→
00:47:45,913
with a regular episode.
00:47:46,262
→
00:47:46,500
But
00:47:46,500
→
00:47:47,590
before then, if you'd
00:47:47,590
→
00:47:47,750
like
00:47:47,880
→
00:47:48,560
more Rotten
00:47:48,560
→
00:47:49,270
Borough stories,
00:47:49,360
→
00:47:49,650
you'd like
00:47:49,760
→
00:47:51,520
more stories about what's going
00:47:51,520
→
00:47:51,640
on
00:47:51,640
→
00:47:52,590
at the national level, there
00:47:52,750
→
00:47:52,980
even
00:47:52,980
→
00:47:53,730
be more quizzes.
00:47:53,730
→
00:47:54,370
I don't know, Ian.
00:47:54,370
→
00:47:54,660
That's up
00:47:54,660
→
00:47:54,970
to you.
00:47:55,380
→
00:47:56,140
In the next issue
00:47:56,210
→
00:47:56,320
of
00:47:56,320
→
00:47:57,560
Private Eye, they are
00:47:57,560
→
00:47:58,410
available on
00:47:58,990
→
00:47:59,340
If you want
00:47:59,340
→
00:47:59,450
to
00:47:59,450
→
00:48:00,230
subscribe,
00:48:00,290
→
00:48:01,380
subscriptions are available
00:48:01,410
→
00:48:01,630
well.
00:48:01,790
→
00:48:02,240
Just go to
00:48:02,290
→
00:48:03,110
private-eye.co.uk.
00:48:05,378
→
00:48:05,648
until
00:48:05,667
→
00:48:09,037
then, thanks to you for listening, and to Matt Hill of Rethink Audio for producing.
00:48:09,177
→
00:48:09,607
Bye for now.