{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"What Did Maggie Murdaugh's Divorce Lawyer Already Know?","description":"Two threads of the Murdaugh case worth pulling on — what was already in motion before June 7, 2021, and what the prosecution may not get to use at a second trial.\n\nMaggie Murdaugh had reportedly retained a divorce attorney. She was living apart from Alex. June 7 was a day she did not want to spend at Moselle, and two witnesses testified to exactly that. She went anyway. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott — who writes about separation danger on her Substack, Spotlight on Psychology — walks through the behavioral mechanics. What shifts inside a controlling partner who senses he's losing his grip. Why compliance becomes automatic after years of keeping the peace. What someone in that window needs to recognize before it's too late.\n\nOn the legal track, the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled the prosecution overreached at the original trial. Twelve and a half hours on financial crimes testimony was deemed excessive, and any retrial must be significantly trimmed. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis maps the evidentiary terrain. The court specifically flagged testimony about individual theft victims as having no probative value on motive — emotionally damaging to Alex Murdaugh, legally irrelevant. What survives is the narrow exposure window: the firm's CFO allegedly confronting Murdaugh about missing fees the morning of the killings, and an opposing attorney's hearing scheduled three days later that would have forced financial disclosure.\n\nFaddis also examines the open evidentiary questions the court left unsettled — the firearm analysis, the blue raincoat, the gunshot residue testimony, and the iPhone demonstration — and identifies which one gives the defense its strongest opening. Plus the strategic decision the defense has to make before anything else.\n\nFOOTER LINKS\n\nJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/\n\nWant to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1\n\nInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/\n\nFacebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/\n\nTik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod\n\nX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod\n\nDISCLAIMER\n\nThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.\n\nHASHTAGS\n\n#AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #MurdaughTrial #MurdaughRetrial #SCSupremeCourt #EricFaddis #ShavaunScott #Moselle #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime","author_name":"Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary","author_url":"https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-true-crime-news-commentary","provider_name":"Audioboom","provider_url":"https://audioboom.com","width":480,"height":95,"thumbnail_url":"https://audioboom.com/i/43655582/600x600/c","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600,"html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"95\" src=\"https://embeds.audioboom.com/posts/8905901/embed?v=202301\" style=\"background-color: transparent; display: block; padding: 0; width: 100%\" frameborder=\"0\" allowtransparency=\"allowtransparency\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"Audioboom player\" allow=\"autoplay\" sandbox=\"allow-downloads allow-forms allow-popups allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-storage-access-by-user-activation allow-top-navigation-by-user-activation\"></iframe>"}
