News18 Daybreak | Cabinet Likely to Pass Ordinance Against 13-Point Roster System in its Last Meeting Today and Other Stories You Need to Watch Out For
What to Watch Out For
Cabinet likely to pass ordinance against 13-point roster system in its last meeting
The Cabinet in its last meeting today is expected to pass an ordinance to negate the Supreme Court order enforcing the 13-point UGC roster system in universities.
The move comes only two days after Dalit and Adivasi rights groups around the countries went on strike to demand a reprieve of the new roster system and the quashing of SC order evicting 10 lakh tribals and forest-dwelling families.
Past developments: In January the Supreme Court had upheld the Allahabad High Court’s decision to implement this roster system, dismissing all the appeals by the Centre and the UGC. The government had at the time promised to bring in an ordinance if their subsequent review petition gets quashed. Then on February 27, the Centre’s review petition was dismissed by the SC.
Union Human Resource Development Minister Prakash Javadekar on Tuesday said that “all necessary legal means will be taken and the university community will get justice” promising a reversal to the old 200-point system.
“Reservation should be given considering a university as one whole unit, and not in a department-wise manner,” he said.
Why it matters: According to the University Grant Commission's new 13-point roster system, individual departments and not universities or colleges will be considered as the unit for implementing reservation for SC/ST or OBC in appointments for faculty positions Many have said that this will drastically cut the number of posts reserved for the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes. Dalits, Adivasis and the Other Backward Classes who have been accorded 15%, 7.5% and 27% reservation respectively. Hence, if the unit under consideration is small, there will be no scope for ensuring reservation.
Meanwhile, the SC stayed the eviction order calling for an investigation into the tribals’ claims over the lands in question.
‘For our rights’: Tuesday’s bandh witnessed thousands of people across several states of India stage protests for promulgation against the two court orders. Political parties including the Congress, Samajwadi Party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Rashtriya Lok Dal had also expressed their support for the demands.
Congress chief Rahul Gandhi had hit out at the government in a Twitter post saying, “Our tribal and Dalit siblings are in crisis. The false promises and false promises of the prime minister have forced them to land on the streets today. Their forest and the right to life are constantly attacked. Withholding forest rights. From tampering in constitutional reservation. I am completely with them.”
In the national capital, members of the Delhi Union Teacher’s Association, Krantikari Yuva Sangathan and several others had gathered in Jantar Mantar to protest against the orders.
What You May Have Missed
‘Stolen Rafale Files’ in public domain, can't be untouchable: SC terms govt defence bad in law
The central government on Wednesday told the Supreme Court that it is contemplating criminal actions against those involved in ‘illegal’ leaks and ‘stealing’ of some pertinent documents from the Ministry of Defence (MoD). In what may also be construed as certifying the authenticity of the documents published by The Hindu newspaper and news agency ANI, Attorney General KK Venugopal argued that the top court cannot rely on these documents since they were not only stolen but also marked as classified under the Official Secrets Act. But the bench headed by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi told the government that if the documents were stolen, it is for the government to put its house in order.
The SC was hearing a clutch of petitions on the review on the earlier verdict which had ruled in favour of the Centre on the 36 Rafale jet deal with France.
Here are a few other highlights from Wednesday's hearing:
Justice KM Joseph asked the government why stolen or unlawful documents cannot be looked into irrespective of how it helps the court. “There were allegations of corruption in Bofors. Now will you say the same thing that a criminal court shouldn't look into any such document?”
Attorney General KK Venugopal expressed displeasure, questioning how the court could deal with a defence contract. “This is the only country where a court is examining a defence deal as if it is a matter of administrative law.”
Citing the ongoing tensions between India and Pakistan, the Attorney General underscored the importance of having Rafale jets in the Indian Air Force. "We need Rafale jet to defend our country from F-16 fighter planes that recently bombed us. Without Rafale, how can we resist them," the A-G said. "Rafale fighter jets are needed although MIG-21 of 1960s performed beautifully against F-16," he added.