Expert Witness Contradicts Prosecution's Case in Murdaugh Trial #ExpertTestimony #MurderTrial

In Alex Murdaugh's trial, a forensic pathologist named Dr. Jonathan Eisenstat took the stand and explained why he disagreed with the autopsy findings on the trajectory of the bullets that killed Paul. Dr. Eisenstat's testimony was a crucial moment in the trial, as he testified that Paul's shooter would've been covered in blood and brain material based on his findings. This testimony challenged the prosecution's case and added a new twist to the already complex trial. The expert witness's testimony brought the focus back to the forensic evidence and the credibility of the autopsy report, reigniting discussions on the validity of the prosecution's case. #ForensicEvidence #TrialTestimony #ForensicScience #MurderTrialUpdates

Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

Follow Our Other Cases:
 
  Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://availableon.com/universityofidahomurderspodcast4killedforwhat

Chad & Lori Daybell -
  https://availableon.com/demiseofthedaybellsthelorichaddaybellstory

  The Murder of Ana Walshe -
https://availableon.com/findinganathisdisappearanceofanawalshe

Alex Murdaugh -
https://availableon.com/thetrialofalexmurdaugh

The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger -
https://availableon.com/theidahomurdersthecaseagainstbryankohberger

True Crime Today (All Cases & EXTRA Commentary) -
https://availableon.com/truecrimetodayatruecrimepodcast

 Follow Tony Brueski On Twitter https://twitter.com/tonybpod

Join our Facebook Discussion Group:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/834636321133