What Will Be Donna Adelson's Defense In Upcoming Trial?
Feb 22, 12:00 AM
What does the absence of a plea deal signify in a high-profile murder case? This crucial question is at the heart of a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," where host Tony Brueski and defense attorney Bob Motta, host of "Defense Diaries," discuss the latest developments in the murder case of Dan Markel, involving Donna Adelson, her son Charlie, and potentially other family members.
Donna Adelson, accused of masterminding the murder of her former son-in-law Dan Markel, has been denied a plea deal, a move that Motta finds unsurprising. He suggests that the decision to go to trial without a plea deal indicates the family's united front, especially considering Charlie Adelson's insistence on his innocence and ongoing appeal. Motta posits, "for her to plead guilty would be an absolute death knell to Charlie’s appeal."
The conversation turns to the potential defense strategies for Donna Adelson. Motta doubts she would betray her family, even in the face of mounting evidence. He adds, "She’s not snitching. She’s not turning state’s evidence." Motta also speculates on why the prosecution might have approached Donna with a plea deal offer, considering their belief in Charlie's primary role in orchestrating the hit.
Brueski and Motta delve into Wendy Adelson's involvement in the case. Despite strong circumstantial evidence, Motta suggests Wendy might have been too crafty for prosecutors to gather sufficient evidence against her. He notes, "They started with Charlie because they felt they had the strongest case with Charlie."
The discussion also touches on Harvey Adelson, Donna's husband, and his potential knowledge of the crime. Motta points out that the dynamics of long-term relationships can vary, making it challenging to ascertain his level of involvement or awareness without concrete evidence like text messages or communications.
As the conversation concludes, Motta and Brueski highlight the complexity and intrigue surrounding the Markel murder case. The absence of a plea deal for Donna Adelson raises questions about the state's confidence in their evidence and the Adelson family's defense strategy, leaving observers to wonder: What will be revealed in the upcoming trial?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Donna Adelson, accused of masterminding the murder of her former son-in-law Dan Markel, has been denied a plea deal, a move that Motta finds unsurprising. He suggests that the decision to go to trial without a plea deal indicates the family's united front, especially considering Charlie Adelson's insistence on his innocence and ongoing appeal. Motta posits, "for her to plead guilty would be an absolute death knell to Charlie’s appeal."
The conversation turns to the potential defense strategies for Donna Adelson. Motta doubts she would betray her family, even in the face of mounting evidence. He adds, "She’s not snitching. She’s not turning state’s evidence." Motta also speculates on why the prosecution might have approached Donna with a plea deal offer, considering their belief in Charlie's primary role in orchestrating the hit.
Brueski and Motta delve into Wendy Adelson's involvement in the case. Despite strong circumstantial evidence, Motta suggests Wendy might have been too crafty for prosecutors to gather sufficient evidence against her. He notes, "They started with Charlie because they felt they had the strongest case with Charlie."
The discussion also touches on Harvey Adelson, Donna's husband, and his potential knowledge of the crime. Motta points out that the dynamics of long-term relationships can vary, making it challenging to ascertain his level of involvement or awareness without concrete evidence like text messages or communications.
As the conversation concludes, Motta and Brueski highlight the complexity and intrigue surrounding the Markel murder case. The absence of a plea deal for Donna Adelson raises questions about the state's confidence in their evidence and the Adelson family's defense strategy, leaving observers to wonder: What will be revealed in the upcoming trial?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com