Jennifer Coffindaffer & Philip Dubé: The TRUTH About Kohberger’s Appeal Rights
Aug 03, 06:37 PM
Share
Subscribe
In this powerful episode of Break The Case with Jennifer Coffindaffer, former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer is joined by veteran Los Angeles defense attorney Philip Dubé to tackle the big legal question on everyone’s mind: Can Bryan Kohberger still appeal his guilty plea in the Idaho murders case?
The discussion centers on the landmark case Garza v. Idaho, a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that changed how appellate rights are viewed when a defendant pleads guilty and waives appeals. Jennifer and Philip walk through how this precedent could apply to Kohberger, who recently pleaded guilty to the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, receiving life without parole instead of the death penalty.
Could Kohberger attempt to use Garza to file an appeal despite his waiver? Would Ann Taylor, his defense attorney, be required to file a notice of appeal if he asked her to — even if she believes there are no valid grounds? Philip Dubé explains the process step by step, from filing notices of appeal to what happens if appellate courts find no legitimate issues. He also explores why pursuing an appeal could backfire and put Kohberger at risk of reinstating death penalty eligibility.
Jennifer raises key concerns about the plea deal, the lack of a full confession or disclosure from Kohberger, and the limited forensic evidence revealed so far. Together, they dive deep into what the next legal moves could mean for the victims’ families, the justice system, and Kohberger himself as the September 3rd deadline for appeal approaches.
If you want unfiltered legal analysis, straight answers, and expert insight into one of the most closely watched cases in America, this is an episode you cannot miss.
#BryanKohberger #JenniferCoffindaffer #BreakTheCase #TrueCrime #Idaho4 #GarzaVsIdaho #AppealRights #KohbergerTrial #TrueCrimeCommunity #LegalAnalysis
The discussion centers on the landmark case Garza v. Idaho, a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that changed how appellate rights are viewed when a defendant pleads guilty and waives appeals. Jennifer and Philip walk through how this precedent could apply to Kohberger, who recently pleaded guilty to the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, receiving life without parole instead of the death penalty.
Could Kohberger attempt to use Garza to file an appeal despite his waiver? Would Ann Taylor, his defense attorney, be required to file a notice of appeal if he asked her to — even if she believes there are no valid grounds? Philip Dubé explains the process step by step, from filing notices of appeal to what happens if appellate courts find no legitimate issues. He also explores why pursuing an appeal could backfire and put Kohberger at risk of reinstating death penalty eligibility.
Jennifer raises key concerns about the plea deal, the lack of a full confession or disclosure from Kohberger, and the limited forensic evidence revealed so far. Together, they dive deep into what the next legal moves could mean for the victims’ families, the justice system, and Kohberger himself as the September 3rd deadline for appeal approaches.
If you want unfiltered legal analysis, straight answers, and expert insight into one of the most closely watched cases in America, this is an episode you cannot miss.
#BryanKohberger #JenniferCoffindaffer #BreakTheCase #TrueCrime #Idaho4 #GarzaVsIdaho #AppealRights #KohbergerTrial #TrueCrimeCommunity #LegalAnalysis