What the Innocence Project Found When They Opened the Scott Peterson Case

For more than twenty years, Janey Peterson has been saying her brother-in-law Scott did not kill Laci. She hasn’t wavered. She hasn’t changed the core argument. She’s pointed to the same uninvestigated burglary across the street, the same witness sightings, the same evidentiary gaps — and in 2024, the Los Angeles Innocence Project agreed there was enough substance to take the case on.

Scott Peterson’s conviction was built on circumstantial evidence: no weapon, no cause of death established at trial, no crime scene. The California Supreme Court already overturned his death sentence over juror misconduct. And his defense attorney has said publicly that he’d bet his life Scott is innocent.

This episode traces a family’s twenty-year fight and the question it forces: is this loyalty, denial, or something the rest of us haven’t caught up to yet?

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Hashtags:

#ScottPeterson #LaciPeterson #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #FamiliesOfTheAccused #InnocenceProject #JaneyPeterson #TrueCrimePodcast #CrimeFamilies #PetersonCase