What Lindsay Clancy’s Jury Heard About Her Injuries

Prosecutors argued to the jury that Lindsay Clancy’s fall from a second-story window was not sincere and that her injuries were superficial. Clancy, paralyzed and in a wheelchair, sat in the courtroom as the state made that case.

The characterization was part of the prosecution’s theory that the killings of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, were premeditated and that Clancy staged the scene to support an insanity defense. The defense argued the fall was a genuine psychotic act.

The jury deadlocked eleven to one. Reddington filed an emergency petition with the state supreme court. It was denied. A woman was arrested for filming jurors. Sullivan declared a mistrial. And Reddington has already said he wants the next jury sequestered.

Bob Motta of Defense Diaries examines the prosecution’s strategy, the emergency legal filings, and whether a retrial can produce a different result under the same insanity standard.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #KevinReddington #DATimothyCruz #Retrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday