Why the Lindsay Clancy Holdout Juror Needs a Lawyer

One man on the Lindsay Clancy jury refused to acquit. Eleven others voted not guilty by reason of insanity. When the judge declared a mistrial, defense attorney Kevin Reddington told reporters the vote was for acquittal "minus one." He demanded the court investigate the holdout for misconduct. He identified the juror's gender publicly, narrowing the pool to three men. Media reported his name. His personal history landed in public view. The holdout retained his own attorney and released a statement saying he had no doubt about his position. A hearing on the investigation is scheduled for November 2. This segment asks whether this is advocacy or intimidation — and what message it sends to every woman who gets a jury summons for a high-profile case. Clancy has pleaded not guilty.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #HoldoutJuror #JuryDuty #Mistrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #PlymouthCourt #Duxbury #JurorRights