If you get just as high of a viral load whether you've had the thing that "protects you" from the viral load, then why would any argument exist that it is effective, let alone mandated?
Review and critique of an article around a study that showed ZERO difference in a key metric of the effectiveness of the body's response, between those who relied purely on nature and those who were convinced enough to submit to History's Largest Marketing Campaign and violated the sanctity of their body with an experimental substance.