Could The Trauma In 'Take Care of Maya' Case Have Been Prevented?
Oct 09, 2023, 09:00 PM
Share
Subscribe
The distressing Take Care of Maya trial has left the nation grappling with a haunting question: how did a prestigious institution like Johns Hopkins Hospital employ someone with a track record of child abuse to care for vulnerable children? This very question echoed throughout the latest episode of "Hidden Killers", as Tony Brueski sought answers from Neama Rahmani, attorney and former Federal prosecutor.
At the heart of this intricate legal puzzle is Catherine Betty, an individual with a dark shadow from 2007 looming over her – a $2.5 million settlement related to her restraint of a child while working for Suncoast. Despite this disturbing precedent, Betty found herself at the helm of the Maya Kowalski case at Johns Hopkins, a case that has sent shockwaves through the medical and legal communities.
Brueski didn't shy away from pointing out the glaring oversight. "How did Johns Hopkins employ someone like this who had a record of child abuse essentially to be working with Children?" he probed. The entire Kowalski family's ordeal – from being denied the right to be with their ailing daughter to the subsequent and heart-wrenching death of Maya’s mother – can be traced back to, what many see as, gross negligence on the part of those responsible for Maya’s care.
In the larger picture, Rahmani shed light on the complexities of the system. He acknowledged the imperfections within the child protective services: "There are many cases where I've seen, where social workers should have stepped in. Sure. They sided with the parents, and something terrible happens to the kids." However, as Rahmani explains, what stands out in the Kowalski case is not just the failure of one social worker but a systemic collapse of checks and balances.
A poignant part of their discussion revolved around the rare syndrome CRPS. As Rahmani, familiar with injury cases, emphasized, even a minor touch can be agonizing for someone with CRPS. The hospital’s initial oversight in not considering this syndrome, only to later bill for its treatment, was highlighted as a potential starting point for malpractice claims.
Beyond the particulars of the Kowalski case, Rahmani pointed to a broader systemic issue. Cases where children genuinely need intervention sometimes get sidelined or are overshadowed by those where protective services become overly invasive, leading to devastation for innocent families.
What's shocking, however, is the revelation that this isn't an isolated incident at Johns Hopkins. At least 13 other families have reported similar experiences, with one father being incarcerated for nearly 300 days after a hasty evaluation.
Betty's defense, as paraphrased by Brueski, rests on the sheer volume of her work: "I've seen more than three thousand cases over the course of my career... and if only 13 of them I got wrong then, you know batting average isn’t that bad." Yet, as Rahmani compellingly countered with an old English judicial principle, even one unjust incarceration is one too many, especially when it involves separating a child from their family.
The conversation concluded with a reflection on the somber end to Maya’s story. Rahmani clarified the legal nuances surrounding attributing negligence to suicide, explaining the judge's decision to dismiss those claims. The law aside, the emotional turmoil and trauma faced by the Kowalski family remains undeniable.
So, as the dust settles on the Take Care of Maya trial, the nagging question remains: in a system built to protect, how did it go so horribly wrong for the Kowalski family, and how can such tragedies be prevented in the future?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
At the heart of this intricate legal puzzle is Catherine Betty, an individual with a dark shadow from 2007 looming over her – a $2.5 million settlement related to her restraint of a child while working for Suncoast. Despite this disturbing precedent, Betty found herself at the helm of the Maya Kowalski case at Johns Hopkins, a case that has sent shockwaves through the medical and legal communities.
Brueski didn't shy away from pointing out the glaring oversight. "How did Johns Hopkins employ someone like this who had a record of child abuse essentially to be working with Children?" he probed. The entire Kowalski family's ordeal – from being denied the right to be with their ailing daughter to the subsequent and heart-wrenching death of Maya’s mother – can be traced back to, what many see as, gross negligence on the part of those responsible for Maya’s care.
In the larger picture, Rahmani shed light on the complexities of the system. He acknowledged the imperfections within the child protective services: "There are many cases where I've seen, where social workers should have stepped in. Sure. They sided with the parents, and something terrible happens to the kids." However, as Rahmani explains, what stands out in the Kowalski case is not just the failure of one social worker but a systemic collapse of checks and balances.
A poignant part of their discussion revolved around the rare syndrome CRPS. As Rahmani, familiar with injury cases, emphasized, even a minor touch can be agonizing for someone with CRPS. The hospital’s initial oversight in not considering this syndrome, only to later bill for its treatment, was highlighted as a potential starting point for malpractice claims.
Beyond the particulars of the Kowalski case, Rahmani pointed to a broader systemic issue. Cases where children genuinely need intervention sometimes get sidelined or are overshadowed by those where protective services become overly invasive, leading to devastation for innocent families.
What's shocking, however, is the revelation that this isn't an isolated incident at Johns Hopkins. At least 13 other families have reported similar experiences, with one father being incarcerated for nearly 300 days after a hasty evaluation.
Betty's defense, as paraphrased by Brueski, rests on the sheer volume of her work: "I've seen more than three thousand cases over the course of my career... and if only 13 of them I got wrong then, you know batting average isn’t that bad." Yet, as Rahmani compellingly countered with an old English judicial principle, even one unjust incarceration is one too many, especially when it involves separating a child from their family.
The conversation concluded with a reflection on the somber end to Maya’s story. Rahmani clarified the legal nuances surrounding attributing negligence to suicide, explaining the judge's decision to dismiss those claims. The law aside, the emotional turmoil and trauma faced by the Kowalski family remains undeniable.
So, as the dust settles on the Take Care of Maya trial, the nagging question remains: in a system built to protect, how did it go so horribly wrong for the Kowalski family, and how can such tragedies be prevented in the future?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com