QROT-113: Rinvoq as example of "Pfizer circle of hell" (or Abbvie version thereof)
Mar 12, 06:21 PM
[CORRECTION: Slip of tongue at 13:40. Said drugs are "all" inhibitors. I should have said "overwhelmingly" or "often"]
A brief review of previous concepts regarding "solutions" are often just starting another problem. And dot connector using case study
This "medicine" is just to clear up skin problems. But similar to 99.99% of Big Pharma "solutions" it merely rely on INHIBITING your body's proper functioning*, ignoring entirely the likely HUGELY damaging effect of such inhibiting so long as they can market that as little as ONE thing that is a "symptom" of something ELSE, is reduced.
But there is no speculation on whether inhibiting proper functioning MAY be hugely damaging - Rinvoq absolutely DOES cause massive damage. But... THEY. DO. NOT. CARE.
Literally "side effects" include:
Difficulty of breathing, hives, a NEW skin lesion, moles changing, WHITE BLOOD CELLS GROWING OUT OF CONTROL... WEAKNESS ON ONE SIDE OF YOUR BODY.. PROBLEMS WITH YOUR SPEECH OR VISION... CHANGES IN YOUR MENTAL STATE.. BLOOD IN YOUR URINE... HEART ATTACKS... STROKES... SERIOUS BLOOD CLOTS. a NEW skin lesion, moles changing, heart attacks.
We speculate on the not improbable possibility on whether some of these are due to nanoparticle (not nanorobot, relax) used as drug carriers (see TSOT025, TSOT026, QROT-080 . . . others).
This is a potential because as nanoparticles are admittedly a good "potential" drug carrier (that's right - even as environmental science warns of their potential damage if released from the computer manufacturing industry into the general environment, FREAK Big Pharma sees them as a great "potential" prospect to put DIRECTLY in your body, and, if a repeated "medicine" like "anti-depressants", then quite repeatedly).
The dot connection, as covered in those other podcasts, are that therefore the parallel if used as a "drug carrier" is to that of MRNA "vaccine" injuries.
There is the likelihood that nanoparticles (like graphene) were used as "adjuvants" in so-called vaccines (aka MRNA trojan horses, a new drug class, trying to classify for lawsuit protection). Literally spectroscopy by independent research indicated repeatedly its presence. If so, then NOTICE HOW MUCH OF THESE SIDE EFFECTS COINCIDE WITH THE CLOT SHOT.
That is, some are due to the immediate credited function of INHIBITING your body's proper function, but others due to the problems of nano-particles being used**.
* In this case, a "JAK" inhibitor (Janus kinase).
** It's simple, folks. Nanoparticles are related to auto-immunity: Particularly when they're micro-blade shaped, but regardless, in that they are soooo small compared to the same elements as they naturally occur (surprise, most metals are NEVER going to appear as micro particles. They're appearing no smaller than dust sized), that they instead BIND with human tissue. The body then sees a conglomeration, part of it being actually human. But in seeing the "invader" it mistakenly sees the binded human tissue part as foreign. Regular sized metals would never bind with human tissue. As to the injuries related directly to nano-particles (or at least depending on the shape), it is that these nanoparticles are meant to be durable, to "deliver" the drug, up to and including ACROSS THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER. But because they are two small and sometimes sharp, they literally cause damage in the body, over and over again. Leading potentially to vascular damage, or damage to any tissues it encounters. If in cardiovascular system, it literally can damage the usually hyper-smooth vessel walls. Similarly other tissues.
But, they don't WANT you to understand that the mechanism that makes the side effect more understood is easily understood. That would mean it would make perfect SENSE as to why some of the effects (EFFECTS, not "side" effects) are so extremely harmful and/or fatal. Which would put accountability of prior knowledge directly on them. So they just act like "who KNOWS why that could be... but hey.. it happens... no more connected to reason or logic than why that one dude from the small town won the Power Ball. But it's a lie and an excuse. I know... and so do they. The difference is that I'm not trying to gaslight you into thinking that something with major risks is something you are insane or a criminal or both if you doubt.
RELATED EPISODES:
A brief review of previous concepts regarding "solutions" are often just starting another problem. And dot connector using case study
This "medicine" is just to clear up skin problems. But similar to 99.99% of Big Pharma "solutions" it merely rely on INHIBITING your body's proper functioning*, ignoring entirely the likely HUGELY damaging effect of such inhibiting so long as they can market that as little as ONE thing that is a "symptom" of something ELSE, is reduced.
But there is no speculation on whether inhibiting proper functioning MAY be hugely damaging - Rinvoq absolutely DOES cause massive damage. But... THEY. DO. NOT. CARE.
Literally "side effects" include:
Difficulty of breathing, hives, a NEW skin lesion, moles changing, WHITE BLOOD CELLS GROWING OUT OF CONTROL... WEAKNESS ON ONE SIDE OF YOUR BODY.. PROBLEMS WITH YOUR SPEECH OR VISION... CHANGES IN YOUR MENTAL STATE.. BLOOD IN YOUR URINE... HEART ATTACKS... STROKES... SERIOUS BLOOD CLOTS. a NEW skin lesion, moles changing, heart attacks.
We speculate on the not improbable possibility on whether some of these are due to nanoparticle (not nanorobot, relax) used as drug carriers (see TSOT025, TSOT026, QROT-080 . . . others).
This is a potential because as nanoparticles are admittedly a good "potential" drug carrier (that's right - even as environmental science warns of their potential damage if released from the computer manufacturing industry into the general environment, FREAK Big Pharma sees them as a great "potential" prospect to put DIRECTLY in your body, and, if a repeated "medicine" like "anti-depressants", then quite repeatedly).
The dot connection, as covered in those other podcasts, are that therefore the parallel if used as a "drug carrier" is to that of MRNA "vaccine" injuries.
There is the likelihood that nanoparticles (like graphene) were used as "adjuvants" in so-called vaccines (aka MRNA trojan horses, a new drug class, trying to classify for lawsuit protection). Literally spectroscopy by independent research indicated repeatedly its presence. If so, then NOTICE HOW MUCH OF THESE SIDE EFFECTS COINCIDE WITH THE CLOT SHOT.
That is, some are due to the immediate credited function of INHIBITING your body's proper function, but others due to the problems of nano-particles being used**.
* In this case, a "JAK" inhibitor (Janus kinase).
** It's simple, folks. Nanoparticles are related to auto-immunity: Particularly when they're micro-blade shaped, but regardless, in that they are soooo small compared to the same elements as they naturally occur (surprise, most metals are NEVER going to appear as micro particles. They're appearing no smaller than dust sized), that they instead BIND with human tissue. The body then sees a conglomeration, part of it being actually human. But in seeing the "invader" it mistakenly sees the binded human tissue part as foreign. Regular sized metals would never bind with human tissue. As to the injuries related directly to nano-particles (or at least depending on the shape), it is that these nanoparticles are meant to be durable, to "deliver" the drug, up to and including ACROSS THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER. But because they are two small and sometimes sharp, they literally cause damage in the body, over and over again. Leading potentially to vascular damage, or damage to any tissues it encounters. If in cardiovascular system, it literally can damage the usually hyper-smooth vessel walls. Similarly other tissues.
But, they don't WANT you to understand that the mechanism that makes the side effect more understood is easily understood. That would mean it would make perfect SENSE as to why some of the effects (EFFECTS, not "side" effects) are so extremely harmful and/or fatal. Which would put accountability of prior knowledge directly on them. So they just act like "who KNOWS why that could be... but hey.. it happens... no more connected to reason or logic than why that one dude from the small town won the Power Ball. But it's a lie and an excuse. I know... and so do they. The difference is that I'm not trying to gaslight you into thinking that something with major risks is something you are insane or a criminal or both if you doubt.
RELATED EPISODES: