The Eyebrow Argument: A Legal Battle in the Idaho Murders
Mar 10, 10:00 AM
Share
Subscribe
The Eyebrow Argument: A Legal Battle in the Idaho Murders
The legal team defending Bryan Kohberger is trying to erase two words from the courtroom: bushy eyebrows. That’s right. In a case involving the brutal stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students, where DNA, phone records, and surveillance footage have all been presented as evidence, the defense is zeroing in on eyebrows. Why? Because one of the surviving roommates described the intruder as having thick eyebrows, and the prosecution sees this as a key detail linking Kohberger to the crime. But the defense says it’s unreliable and could unfairly sway the jury.
Let’s take it back to the night of November 13, 2022. It was a quiet college town—Moscow, Idaho—until it wasn’t. Sometime in the early morning hours, four students—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin—were brutally stabbed to death in their off-campus home. Two roommates were inside but unharmed. One of them, Dylan Mortensen, later told police she saw a masked man dressed in black walking past her. He had one distinct feature—bushy eyebrows. And just like that, those two words became a central part of the case against Bryan Kohberger.
Kohberger, a Ph.D. student in criminology at nearby Washington State University, was arrested in December after investigators tracked a white Hyundai Elantra seen near the crime scene. Cell phone data placed him in the area multiple times before the murders. Then came the DNA—a sample found on the sheath of a knife left behind at the scene was linked to Kohberger. This was the kind of evidence that made headlines. But here we are, debating facial hair.
Kohberger’s attorneys argue that the eyebrow description is problematic. First, they say it’s vague—lots of people have thick eyebrows. Second, they point out that Dylan was in shock, possibly in a frozen fear response, which could have affected how she processed and remembered details. And third, they’ve gone a step further, claiming that her own artwork—yes, her drawings—showed an unusual focus on eyes and eyebrows, making her observation even less reliable. That’s a pretty creative argument, but the prosecution isn’t buying it.
For them, the eyebrows aren’t just a random detail. They argue that this was one of the few physical descriptors given at the time, and it matches Kohberger. They also point out that while Dylan never identified him directly, her statement about the eyebrows is just one piece of a much larger puzzle. Taken with the other evidence—like his car, phone records, and the DNA—those eyebrows become more than just facial hair. They’re another link in the chain.
The defense isn’t stopping at eyebrows, though. They’re also pushing to keep words like “murder,” “murder weapon,” “psychopath,” and “sociopath” out of the trial. They argue that using these terms before a conviction is reached is unfair and could bias the jury. Essentially, they’re trying to control the language of the trial as much as they can. The prosecution, of course, is pushing back, saying that calling a murder a murder isn’t exactly a stretch.
With the trial set to begin in August, these pre-trial battles are setting the stage for what’s to come. The prosecution is expected to seek the death penalty, and Kohberger’s attorneys will continue to fight every piece of evidence, every witness statement, and apparently, every eyebrow reference that comes their way.
Kohberger’s next court appearance is in April, where the judge will rule on these motions. Until then, the legal chess game continues, with both sides maneuvering for an advantage before the jury is ever seated.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The legal team defending Bryan Kohberger is trying to erase two words from the courtroom: bushy eyebrows. That’s right. In a case involving the brutal stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students, where DNA, phone records, and surveillance footage have all been presented as evidence, the defense is zeroing in on eyebrows. Why? Because one of the surviving roommates described the intruder as having thick eyebrows, and the prosecution sees this as a key detail linking Kohberger to the crime. But the defense says it’s unreliable and could unfairly sway the jury.
Let’s take it back to the night of November 13, 2022. It was a quiet college town—Moscow, Idaho—until it wasn’t. Sometime in the early morning hours, four students—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin—were brutally stabbed to death in their off-campus home. Two roommates were inside but unharmed. One of them, Dylan Mortensen, later told police she saw a masked man dressed in black walking past her. He had one distinct feature—bushy eyebrows. And just like that, those two words became a central part of the case against Bryan Kohberger.
Kohberger, a Ph.D. student in criminology at nearby Washington State University, was arrested in December after investigators tracked a white Hyundai Elantra seen near the crime scene. Cell phone data placed him in the area multiple times before the murders. Then came the DNA—a sample found on the sheath of a knife left behind at the scene was linked to Kohberger. This was the kind of evidence that made headlines. But here we are, debating facial hair.
Kohberger’s attorneys argue that the eyebrow description is problematic. First, they say it’s vague—lots of people have thick eyebrows. Second, they point out that Dylan was in shock, possibly in a frozen fear response, which could have affected how she processed and remembered details. And third, they’ve gone a step further, claiming that her own artwork—yes, her drawings—showed an unusual focus on eyes and eyebrows, making her observation even less reliable. That’s a pretty creative argument, but the prosecution isn’t buying it.
For them, the eyebrows aren’t just a random detail. They argue that this was one of the few physical descriptors given at the time, and it matches Kohberger. They also point out that while Dylan never identified him directly, her statement about the eyebrows is just one piece of a much larger puzzle. Taken with the other evidence—like his car, phone records, and the DNA—those eyebrows become more than just facial hair. They’re another link in the chain.
The defense isn’t stopping at eyebrows, though. They’re also pushing to keep words like “murder,” “murder weapon,” “psychopath,” and “sociopath” out of the trial. They argue that using these terms before a conviction is reached is unfair and could bias the jury. Essentially, they’re trying to control the language of the trial as much as they can. The prosecution, of course, is pushing back, saying that calling a murder a murder isn’t exactly a stretch.
With the trial set to begin in August, these pre-trial battles are setting the stage for what’s to come. The prosecution is expected to seek the death penalty, and Kohberger’s attorneys will continue to fight every piece of evidence, every witness statement, and apparently, every eyebrow reference that comes their way.
Kohberger’s next court appearance is in April, where the judge will rule on these motions. Until then, the legal chess game continues, with both sides maneuvering for an advantage before the jury is ever seated.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com