TSOT127: Now Is the Time to KEEP Investigating the Kirk Incident. Relentlessly.
Sep 17, 03:26 AM
Share
Subscribe
Now is no time to not learn the lesson of history of the token investigation of JFK. We do not want "closure" for Charlie Kirk. What we want, for Kirk and his family and the country, just as for Epstein, just as for JFK, just as for Diddy, is a full and comprehensive investigation, down to the studs of all the details.
Everything. Every possible angle that is sitting out there of who may have egged on, who may have materially contributed towards actionable behavior. And not only that, once we find out "who" those are, we find out who they REALLY are, and who if anyone they're involved with or working on behalf of.
It COULD be as simple as a 22-year-old skull full of mush dating a trans "woman" deciding that a bullet is somehow less hateful than delivering a bullet. But almost no event of this size has been "on its face" simple in decades upon decades.
And, by the way... thorough investigations of potential leads is not "harassment." Leads require conversations with many people, MOST of which are not initial or final suspects. Good investigations REQUIRE uncomfortable conversations. By themselves, those are neither "harassment," nor are they a violation of anyone's rights.
INVESTIGATE. And if any of it implies something, some entity, some country, some group, is gonna be taken down as a result of the investigation, SO BE IT.
Do NOT fall for political bull pressure that "enough is enough." Good investigations inherently take on the complexity that the the leads bare.
Everything. Every possible angle that is sitting out there of who may have egged on, who may have materially contributed towards actionable behavior. And not only that, once we find out "who" those are, we find out who they REALLY are, and who if anyone they're involved with or working on behalf of.
It COULD be as simple as a 22-year-old skull full of mush dating a trans "woman" deciding that a bullet is somehow less hateful than delivering a bullet. But almost no event of this size has been "on its face" simple in decades upon decades.
And, by the way... thorough investigations of potential leads is not "harassment." Leads require conversations with many people, MOST of which are not initial or final suspects. Good investigations REQUIRE uncomfortable conversations. By themselves, those are neither "harassment," nor are they a violation of anyone's rights.
INVESTIGATE. And if any of it implies something, some entity, some country, some group, is gonna be taken down as a result of the investigation, SO BE IT.
Do NOT fall for political bull pressure that "enough is enough." Good investigations inherently take on the complexity that the the leads bare.