Nancy Guthrie: The Accomplice Question — And What Makes Someone Talk
Share
Subscribe
Investigators have publicly stated they're not ruling out multiple people. The evidence is contradictory: sophisticated reconnaissance, sloppy exit. Forensic awareness at the door, a glove dropped miles away. Ransom notes with insider details, no way to collect payment.
If there was a second person — a driver, a lookout, someone who helped plan — they're watching this investigation with different stakes than the person who took Nancy.
Robin Dreeke spent his FBI career getting people to share information they never intended to share. He ran the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. In this interview, he examines what the evidence pattern suggests about multiple actors — and the psychology of the person who finally breaks.
Over two hundred thousand dollars in reward money. Four hundred investigators. DNA processing. Someone in this perpetrator's life knows something is wrong. What makes them act?
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #Accomplice #RobinDreeke #FBIBehavioral #RewardMoney #TucsonKidnapping #GeneticGenealogy #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers
