TSOT149: High Intrigue in Non-Science 2021 - Dr. Andrew Hill's Disingenuous Draft "Peer Review" on Ivermectin Meta-Analysis
Share
Subscribe
Another part of my scouting what some of the participants of the Better Way Conference are about (since I'm attending that conference, and want to have better context and ability to respond and understand and ask questions while there).
This is a follow-up to the last TSOT, in that it is around another document in "Exhibits and References" for Dr. Tess Lawrie's book "Game of Trust."
Directly involved in this case are Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Pierre Kory, who wil both also be in attendance.
What we cover is Marik's and Kory's feedback, via email, of a draft of a peer review of a study on the effectiveness of ivermectin against Covid-19.
In essence, the peer review draft makes caveats and throws cold water on the data in a way that the peer reviewer (Dr. Andrew Hill) in NO WAY had indicated during:
- Discussions and communications with Marik and Kory and team.
- Live presentations to South Africa physicians and researchers.
- What he was aware, and collaborated on, was presented to the National Institutes of Health just days earlier.
This scandal against truth also literally includes multiple of instances of violations of even the most fundamental aspects of how these peer reviews are done.
This is an exhibit in behind-the-scenes strong-arm tactics and/or incentivization and invisible authors to tone down the on-the-record conclusion of science that would save more lives more easily at a lower price (but consequently not line as many pockets with anywhere near as much money).