Lindsay Clancy’s Holdout Said WHAT About Who Proved Their Case?!
Share
Subscribe
The holdout in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial told the room he didn’t know whether the prosecution or the defense had proved their case. Under the instructions Judge Sullivan read that jury, the defense had no burden to prove anything.
Nick Dargie, a 25-year-old military veteran and the most recent juror to speak publicly, said the holdout couldn’t point to any evidence supporting his position and scrolled his phone while other jurors deliberated. He described the holdout pulling an exercise band from the evidence bag, tying it around a water bottle, and pulling it tight — an apparent reenactment Dargie called disgusting.
The foreperson signed three verdict forms after the holdout admitted reasonable doubt. He reversed himself in the same breath. The jury split 11-1 after about 38 hours of deliberation.
Reddington has filed a motion asking the court to enter an acquittal. Cruz has not announced whether he’ll retry. A hearing is set for September 29.
Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#LindsayClancy #ClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #HoldoutJuror #Mistrial #ReasonableDoubt #JuryInstructions #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast
