What Reddington Told the Judge About Lindsay Clancy's Kids
Share
Subscribe
Kevin Reddington built Lindsay Clancy's entire defense on the premise that she killed Cora, Dawson, and Callan while in the grip of postpartum psychosis. He offered to stipulate it in writing. The jury deadlocked 11-1 for acquittal. A mistrial was declared. Then Reddington stood before Judge Sullivan and argued there is no evidence she did it. He called the police investigation nonexistent. He challenged the physical evidence. Prosecutors told the court they were hearing this argument for the first time. The judge took the motion under advisement and scheduled further hearings for November 2. This segment breaks down what Rule 25 actually is, whether it has any realistic chance, and what this pivot means for the retrial. Clancy has pleaded not guilty.
Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #Rule25 #PlymouthCourt #Mistrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #PostpartumPsychosis #Duxbury #MassachusettsCrime
