QROT-083: Rebutting a Bombastic Simplistic Dismissal of 2K Donkeys
Sep 24, 2022, 04:17 PM
A follow-up to TSOT041.
Embarrassingly an EFF writer, an allegedly civil libertarian organization, MANGLES the logic behind strong conclusions, in order to get you dismiss those conclusions, or even to dismiss you from going to investigate it from the horse's mouth.
Surprise... with enough other factors included as systematic analysis, there is little difference between "within 15 feet" of a ball*t dr*p b*x in a statistical sense, to draw macro conclusions from, and being within six inches of the ball*t dr*p b*x.
If you're "only" within 15 feet of said location, but you are that close to TEN of them, that are purposely scattered throughout a city, within the same two-week period during which you're within 15 feet of not one, but FIVE of the organizations that are candidates to supply the material for the fraud, then 15 feet versus one-half inch is just a matter for argument, and does not really affect the statistical likelihood of the conclusion.
(Let alone when because of the data you have you can trace individual routes and see the drop boxes as multiple way points (not merely being passed by) on one long trip around the city. For example. if you legitimately had more than one valid ballot (already an incredible rarity statistically), why would you need to drop by multiple boxes to drop them in, during overnight periods)
Related episode:
Embarrassingly an EFF writer, an allegedly civil libertarian organization, MANGLES the logic behind strong conclusions, in order to get you dismiss those conclusions, or even to dismiss you from going to investigate it from the horse's mouth.
Surprise... with enough other factors included as systematic analysis, there is little difference between "within 15 feet" of a ball*t dr*p b*x in a statistical sense, to draw macro conclusions from, and being within six inches of the ball*t dr*p b*x.
If you're "only" within 15 feet of said location, but you are that close to TEN of them, that are purposely scattered throughout a city, within the same two-week period during which you're within 15 feet of not one, but FIVE of the organizations that are candidates to supply the material for the fraud, then 15 feet versus one-half inch is just a matter for argument, and does not really affect the statistical likelihood of the conclusion.
(Let alone when because of the data you have you can trace individual routes and see the drop boxes as multiple way points (not merely being passed by) on one long trip around the city. For example. if you legitimately had more than one valid ballot (already an incredible rarity statistically), why would you need to drop by multiple boxes to drop them in, during overnight periods)
Related episode: