D4vd’s Attorney Told A Judge WHAT About Celeste?!

Jul 31, 02:00 PM
Subscribe

Five days of testimony. A twenty-one-minute window between Celeste Rivas Hernandez’s Uber arrival and her phone going silent forever. DNA tying a fourteen-year-old’s blood to a garage, a Tesla, and a rental home. A record deal worth up to nineteen million dollars. And a defense attorney who asked the medical examiner whether the fatal wounds could have been self-inflicted.

Former prosecutor Eric Faddis reads the defense strategy Blair Berk is building and answers what the courtroom was already asking: is she actually arguing self-inflicted death in a dismemberment case, or is she stacking every fragment of reasonable doubt she can find?

The defense keeps making two claims in one sentence: Burke “did not murder” Celeste and “was not the cause of her death.” Faddis on why that split language tells you everything about where the trial is headed.

Burke has pleaded not guilty to all charges. Celeste was fourteen years old.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#D4vd #CelesteRivas #BlairBerk #DavidAnthonyBurke #TrueCrime #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #DeathPenalty #MurderTrial #JusticeForCeleste